Jump to content

evfool

Members
  • Posts

    22
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by evfool

  1. Hmm, thanks for the heads-up, I just drew the side-view to "calculate" neck and headstock angle (at least a rough estimation) and indeed, the short grain could cause some issues with a 4.5-4.8 degree break angle (that's what came out for me to have a proper action at the 12th fret with the roller bridge I have)., plus the neck pickup route. Maybe the multi-laminate neck gives some "protection", but good to keep in mind.
  2. Whoops, forgot to mention that. I'm aiming for 25.5 (to be on the "standard" side). Why do you think 25.3 would've been a better choice on your semi-hollow (do you mean your ES-137 by that, that seems to be your recent semi-hollow)? And can you point out the problems a neck-through solves, which you would have with a non-neck-through?
  3. Time to plan and build another guitar, with all the craze going on with #greatguitarbuildoff in the builder communities. In any case, I did get hold of some cherry and black locust boards, two strips of walnut veneer and (not sure of what kind of) oak veneer (2.5mm thickness) and I'm planning a semi-hollow build with some twists: Here's the specs (heavily inspired by Starcaster, which is heavily inspired by ES-335) neck-through 5-piece neck : black locust, walnut, cherry, walnut, black locust 2 or 3-ply oak laminated sides Bigsby B5 trem roller tune-o-matic bridge double humbuckers (or maybe humbucker-sized P90s) 3R3L slim headstock, with fairly straight string pull, and with a smaller (PRS-esque) 10 degrees tiltback 2V2T plus master volume, plus 3-way switch carved top and bottom (aiming for 6mm thickness) some darker fretboard (rosewood or ebonized cherry/black locust/beech) Here's a rouch Inkscaped mockups of what I thought of: There are quite some challenges for the rookie in me, e.g. the carved top, laminating a neck (and preparing the pieces for that), routing a truss rod channel, but I have to learn those parts too sometime, and now seems like the right time.
  4. Whoops, indeed. Tried the nail varnish on a scrap wood piece, and it's too thick, so the edges can be felt, which is not worth it. But the idea of masking everything except the area I want to paint, painting with a sharpie, removing the masking tape ( leave it on the sides of the neck) and applying a clear coat all over the fretboard sounds doable. Ok. The idea of scraping off the finish, dyeing and applying a clear coat sounds the most professional solution, but with my experience (almost 0) it also sounds the easiest to mess up. Maybe at some point later... you know, the thing driving me into/onto the next challenging journey
  5. I was thinking about the "difference" between the front and the back, but I was absolutely scared of painting all that beautiful wood with a solid color, so I decided to go with that. Any thought how I could make that "difference" less prominent? Maybe a black coat, with a silver/white showing off the different wood grains (I saw some techniques to make the grain pop with a light colour with a black coat)? Do you think it would help it? Is it required? And yes, you are absolutely right on the fingerboard. But I'm not sure how I could've done that part better, as I needed a very thin layer of paint. Given the fact that I had an already finished neck, with frets on, I was improvising and also I wasn't sure how that would look, so that's a sharpie, which comes off pretty easily, especially under frets played a lot. Which is good, if the thing/thongue didn't work out very nice. Which id didn't. But it's easily redoable, which I will probably do so (I'm not 100% satisfied with the headstock part of that thongue either). But after redoing and when I'm 100% satisfied with that, I will probably spray a thin clearcoat all over the neck to make sure it stays. Do you have any ideas how else I could "paint" part the neck in a thin-enough coat to not feel it, but still see it, and make it permanent enough under constant fretting?
  6. And the guitar was completed. Next came the intonation, filing a new nut (the original one broke) from an old guitar saddle (which was filed too low) I had available, and setting the intonation. The bridge angle was a bit off, so the high E and B saddles pushed all the way is perfectly intonated, so probably I should've drilled the treble-side post a bit farther, but it just works now. A couple of shots from different angles, but I'm really satisfied with the results.
  7. Next came painting the top with acrylic (fairly easy, mostly just colouring in between the lines, mostly basic colours I had readily available, only had to mix colours for Marios face and the cloud), painting a faux-binding with black, as the outlines were also black, and the edges rounded over by sanding (I was afraid that the rounding bit would tear the plywood apart). Then finishing with a spray-can of semi-gloss clear-coat both over the top and the body, and wiring the electronics. Even though soldering went fine (pickup blend pot, 3-way switcher and master volume - yes, I know it might not make sense, but the wiring is useful in some contexts, e.g. blend all-the-way to one pickup plus the threeway can function as a kill-switch - and I didn't have a tone cap available) But the wiring turned out fairly clean, with a lot of space for a piezo preamp and a 9V battery inside the cavity, for future enhancements. And I wired the jack incorrectly, which meant I did rewire the whole thing, until I realized that I just should've switched the jack wiring around.
  8. After gluing the two mosaic layer pieces together using all my clamps I had available, came lot of sanding and chiseling and rasp-work, due to the router not being able to access some parts (e.g. the part between the tail and the hand, and around the had. It took quite some work to get the body close to the size of the top, but it worked out well (although there still are some areas which aren't perfect, but lacking the proper rasps - very thin ones - and in some places the wood being extremely hard, I gave up with agood-enough result instead of going for perfection) The next thing was rounding over the edges using a rounding router bit, then after trying the body and realizing that it needs a belly-carve, I took the rasp and did some more shaping on the top part. After the body was in a good shape, came the wood filling using a grain filler, then sanding it smooth using a sander with 60-120-200-400 grit sandpaper. And here came the most problematic part, finishing. As I had lots of different wood species on the body, and another type, a plywood for the top, it was really hard to decide what to use. I had some pieces of the plywood laying around, so I have tested one side with shellac and the other side with boiled linseed oil as the "base coat". Wait one day, sanding, another layer of the same coat, and repeat it three times. The BLO side came out better, smoother, and after trying acrylic over both of the sides, acrylic did seem to stick better to BLO, so I went with BLO over the body and the top too. The BLO made the back colors pop, and it really shows each wood species' grain beautifully. As I forgot to take a picture of the pickups inside the guitar before finishing, I quickly took a shot now, after test-mounting the top with all the screws. The top comes off, just like a pickguard, but as it's a string-through you have to remove the strings and the bridge to be able to remove the top.
  9. Continuing the story, I needed a neck cavity I made hell-of-a-mess with that, as the upper side was a really hard wood, which resulted in the wood burning and smoking all the time. But it turned out like this, and became even better after some chiseling. From the next step I have learnt that I should think first and cut afterwards. I was thinking that I don't want humbucker ring to obstruct the top, so I wanted a "back-adjustable" humbucker. Not sure how I thought that, but (fortunately before cutting the rear access) I realized that humbuckers are meant to be front-adjustable (screws, spring, gravity) .... but the center seam was already cut, so no place to screw the neck HB in, so change of plans to a soapbar P90, which has the screws in the middle, which would be on the center-seam. So "quickly" ordered a set of soapbar P90s along with some more accessories, including a telecaster Jack. Fast forward 40 days, when I get to pick up the ordered parts... and it's a 25g package, which only has the telecaster jack (mid-March). Nice one. And in the meantime coronavirus hit, so no chance to order another set and get it soonish... So checking what I had in-house: two humbuckers, 3 single coils, 3-piezo disc acoustic pickup and a soundhole pickup, which didn't work as a soundhole pickup due to a broken side-ear. Humbuckers and single-coils had the same adjustment screws... so I was left with the piezo pickup and the soundhole pickup (something like a Seymour Duncan Woody, only made by Shadow). The soundhole pickup had a 6mm thick wooden top, which I cut down, to "replace" it with my plywood top. Also attached the piezo discs to the top, attached the magnetic soundhole pickup to the top with two screws, and made some tests to check the volume of the magnetic and find the best location for the piezo discs. At this point I only had clamps holding the two layers plus the top together, but the body seemed to be resonating well. As the top is not really moving freely as in acoustic guitars, I found that I'm better off putting the piezo discs inside the body (not on the top, but inside the chambers). And one of them sandwhiched between the top and the center seam close to the bridge. Oh, and I almost forgot: wanted through-body stringing (to reduce the parts obstructing the top drawing to the bare minimum), but as the body is fairly small, full-through-body stringing would've required very steep angle on the strings, so I have drilled from the side to the top, drilled a bit larger on the side to fit the steel nuts I was using instead of string ferrules (no string ferrules are to be found in Romania, and Corona was delaying every import).
  10. Yes, I agree with your worries. Tried to find a piece where both posts are in hardwood, but I couldn't (pine is very common here, so the mozaic has most of it), so I risked. If you check the other piece, that also has pine right where one of the bridge posts should be. I was thinking that with the posts fixed, they shouldn't be moving and the downward pressure of the strings is fairly constant, the string angle after the bridge to the through-body holes is not very steep either, so maybe it won't have issues. But maybe it will, only time will tell. In the worst case I'll take the top off, route a square around the bridge post on pine, and put a piece of hardwood there (the top is not glued in, but held with screws, so this can be done easily)
  11. After laser-cutting and engraving the outlines for the top design to 6mm thick plywood, started working on the body, from so-called mosaic wood from a local hardware store, which is probably made from scrap wood pieces of different woods, which looked really fine. As the boards were 20cm wide and 2 cm thick, had to do 2 layers, so I started gluing the pieces together, and rough-cutting them based on the laser-cut template. Then I started "chambering" one of the two pieces, which was fairly easy, as the two layers were not glued together, so just drilled the holes, and cut it out with a jigsaw. The center seam was left wider towards the end to make sure it can hold the bridge posts.
  12. As each beginner I started building my dream guitar with all the fancy features, called a musicboy (evfool created a topic in In Progress and Finished Work) Until I realized I don't have the tools to properly do it, so I wanted to do something easier for practicing, until I will be ready to finish that one. And learning from the failure I didn't post until I wasn't sure I can do it (which is after it is finished). So this is a build thread, showing the 3 months progress in larger steps. The neck I had was a 22.5 inch scale short neck, so I had to build a down-scaled guitar to match it. I wanted to have a cartoony one with Mario and Yoshi (my childhoods favourite characters) for my son, asking for a guitar with a dragon (saw quite a few nice pictures, but I just couldn't design one a standard-looking body with a neck), so we agreed to consider Yoshi a dragon. After scaling down a telecaster body, added the two characters onto the body plans, and adjusted them to properly fit (the upper horn), plus added a cloud for the lower horn. Wanted to use some pickups laying around, a humbucker for neck and a single-coil for the bridge, with painter covers to match the top. This is what the resulting plans look like.
  13. Any chance for a short clip (sound and/or video) on how the GOTM entry United Solutions Stage Acoustic sounds? I'd really be interested how a fully hollowed out guitar body with an acoustic top sounds. I wanted to do something similar, but as a search for it yielded no results, I considered that people don't do that because it is not worth it and I dropped the idea.

    1. verhoevenc

      verhoevenc

      Sure, I'll keep this page open to remind me, and I'll grab something next time I'm around it and have time.

    2. verhoevenc

      verhoevenc

      Here you go. Hopefully this is helpful?

      Chris

    3. evfool

      evfool

      Absolutely helpful. Thanks.

  14. Wow... I can't stop looking at the grain of that fretboard (or the body). Can't wait to see both of them together.
  15. Ignore the Manganin and Nikrothal option, those probably won't work in pickups (electromagnets) as they don't have any magnetic attraction.
  16. Hello Joel, I know I've arrived pretty late to this train, the six-pack being superseded by Neo (I've read lots of interesting material about the design and development, and can't be thankful enough for making it available, along with the hardware plans). I'd have a question about the original Six-Pack design: do you happen to have, and could you give any more details about the coil wire used for the six-pack coils? I remember reading somewhere that it was 46AWG, and (based on the final design) it had 2000 turns with a 450ohms impedance. I'm trying to build something similar and I am searching for the best wire to do it, and can't tell what material and what resistance properties to choose (860 Ω/m NICHROME Nikrothal and 362.4 Ω/m MANGANIN CuMn12Ni would be the ones easily available - the nichrome has more than double resistance, so I'd probably need less of that, meaning smaller coils) ? Regards, Robert
  17. Yep, I'm nuts for sure. And I don't use cardboard only for modeling. I used it for building a guitar too, just to prove that I'm nuts
  18. Time for an update. I'm not dead, but building this guitar is going to take a while. As for the design, regardless of how much I liked the original one (probably because of the tiny-looking body, with the bridge close to the end of the guitar body - something I got from basses, I love how they look), I had to update it. I have printed out the body onto paper, and it looked too small for the neck, and the curves have been in bad places: the upper side of the lower bout I am using for resting by elbows, and the waist needs to be in the right place to play comfortably while sitting. Additionally, with the bridge so close to the end of the guitar body, it looses some of it's versatility, I won't have the possibility to build a bigsby tailpieced hexagon part Looking around for the proper positioning and sizes I took a deep dive into semi-hollow guitars (not being a fan of symmetric double-cut ES-335 styled ones, either the single-cut ones or the offset double-cut ones), have created a shortlist of 11 semi-hollow guitars with F-holes, and a 25.5 scale length, have aligned them in 3 points (nut, saddle, and "body meets neck" around the 15th fret) and compared their body sizes. My original inspiration, the MusicMan Axis Super Sport semi-hollow was the shortest (and smallest) one of all, and my design was even smaller than that one. And all those guitars have been designed by people with more experience in guitar design then me. Maybe it wouldn't matter that much for a solid-body (except for maybe balance, etc), but for a semi-hollow ... who knows, and I don't want to risk it. Here's some pictures with the new design (new design outline overlayed on top of the old design for comparison, and the new design only). As for the work on the guitar itself, I started working on the wood, and have pre-cut most of the wood I will be using: ordered a laser-cut hexagon template to use of the correct size pre-cut to approximate size the solid core block, a piece of beech 4.2 cm thick, 10.5 cm wide, and approx 50 cm long pre-cut 24 pieces of 4.2 cm thick hexagons to approximately the same size as the laser-cut hexagon, to be trimmed down to exact size using flush trim router bits with bottom-bearing So the current status looks like: What next? can't wait for my flush trim router bits to get here (had some troubles with the initial order and had to reorder) had to reconsider using the tuning machines I wanted to order, due to ordering issues and counter-recommendations, so I'll probably switch over to black locking half-moon tuning keys I need to print a template with the updated body shape to cardboard to see if I need any other adjustments, if not, will prepare a routing template based on the cardboard version
  19. Yes, that will be my first attempt. I was also thinking about one coil per string to have a hexaphonic pickup (inspired by Cycfi Research NU pickups), but probably I'll start with the "easier" two-coil version, with low impedance, and a preamp, making it an active pickup (loosely based on the cycfi nu, using a similar preamp module, but with a two channel op-amp, one for each coil). Or the easy way (not too cheap though) would be to use a Parker Ricochet, which has the pickup poles in V-shape, but also does have a frame, which wouldn't really fit the build aesthetics as I wanted it to fit it.
  20. Another point on the replaceable hexagons: the one under the bridge (~1.5-2cm thickness) will be fixed to the hardwood block going underneath it with a set of neck screws (see plum dots for locations) with inserts inside the pine hexagon (just like the neck). The other two, the one for the controls and the other one serving as pickup frame (~1cm thickness) will be held in place by small magnets, the small grey dots.
  21. And pressed shift/ctrl+enter in the middle of the post, so continuing here: body will be a custom shape, designed for the neck (but the neck being similar to a MusicMan, the body will also be inspired by that) the body will be built from hexagons out of leftover 12cmx12cm spruce blocks, with endgrain being visible the body will be semi-hollow three hexagons will be replaceable: the one with the bridge, one for the controls, and the one around neck pickup There will be a hardwood block through the middle of the body, which will have the neck pocket, solid under the pickups and the bridge. As for the electronics I'm planning for a dual-rail neck pickup and a custom-built/wound V-shaped pickup (in case I can't do it will fall back to a humbucker), plus a piezo UST under the hardtail bridge, with 1 volume for each, 1 master tone, and a 5-way blade switch. The hardest part I see is the V-shape pickup (not that the rest of the body build would be easy), but any ideas, thoughts, feedback would be appreciated.
  22. Hello. As lots of others, I did just sign up for ProjectGuitar, to be able to more closely follow what others are building, and ask advice on what I am building, hoping for the best. So far I've built a semi-hollow LP kit, and restored an old russian acoustic (custom inlays, neck reset, bridge reshape, reglue, top refinish, etc), and I wanted to do a guitar from scratch. I found a cheap neck online close to me I liked a lot, so I designed a guitar around it. Beginners mistake, got caught with the flow, and the guitar came out fairly complex. The idea would be to have some sort of modularity, to be able to change some parts if I get bored: designing with a hardtail bridge,
×
×
  • Create New...