Jump to content

Do You Think An Sg-style Body Would Be Too...


JackyB

Recommended Posts

I would think an SG would be a good first project, they look fairly simple (i havnt actaully built a guitar, but i know a fair bit about wood work) they have a beveld edge, provided you take your time itl be good, im sure.

If you are still unsure about building your own body, get one from warmoth, there good bodys.

Good luck with it whatever way you choose to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its a good body style to begin with, tele is also an easy one. Just make sure you use an SG template for cutting the SG body. A lot of people assume that the SG body is symmetrical, it is NOT. If you look closely you will see that the bass side of the lower bout is 1/2" further off the centerline than the treble side. Its very subtle but I guess thats part of what makes the shape so appealing, :D .

Edited by Southpa
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay the SG sounds like a go. I also considered doing a Tele-shaped guitar with SG components (mahogany body, SG pickups, wiring, etc.) But I really like how SGs look. I think I'll just order a mohogany blank and maybe I'll be able to make up my mind before it arrives.

Where would be a good place to check for SG templates?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its a good body style to begin with, tele is also an easy one. Just make sure you use an SG template for cutting the SG body. A lot of people assume that the SG body is symmetrical, it is NOT. If you look closely you will see that the bass side of the lower bout is 1/2" further off the centerline than the treble side. Its very subtle but I guess thats part of what makes the shape so appealing, :D .

Hmm, yeh, i dont personaly see the atraction to SG's, there hidious IMO. I'd go with a tele, but each to his own i spose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its a good body style to begin with, tele is also an easy one.  Just make sure you use an SG template for cutting the SG body.  A lot of people assume that the SG body is symmetrical, it is NOT.  If you look closely you will see that the bass side of the lower bout is 1/2" further off the centerline than the treble side.  Its very subtle but I guess thats part of what makes the shape so appealing,  :D .

Hmm, yeh, i dont personaly see the atraction to SG's, there hidious IMO. I'd go with a tele, but each to his own i spose.

That's pretty funny because I used to hate the style of Tele's, although now I'm pretty accepting. I like SG's because they have a certain "radical" look to them, but they're not over-the-top like Explorers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay the SG sounds like a go. I also considered doing a Tele-shaped guitar with SG components (mahogany body, SG pickups, wiring, etc.) But I really like how SGs look. I think I'll just order a mohogany blank and maybe I'll be able to make up my mind before it arrives.

Where would be a good place to check for SG templates?

www.guitarbuild.com has a few good templates in DXG and DWG format, so you'll need a view.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Necks on Both, the Tele and SG are quite meaty for me, so I looked at the LTD Viper and their necks were bulky also. I think the perfect marriage would be an Ibanez Style Neck with The Viper Body. Bolt on Neck of course, since the bolt's are much easier for the first time builder rather than a set neck like SG's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...