Hughes Posted November 18, 2005 Report Posted November 18, 2005 hey, im currently getting my parts together for my build. i want an EMG in my bridge possistion (because the bridge is what i use for distortion) and something more good for clean tones. is there a problem with sticking a EMG with a nice warm pickup? if its all good, what would you guys recommend putting in the neck? thanks Quote
Sambo Posted November 18, 2005 Report Posted November 18, 2005 Should be fine, lots of people do it. But as the EMG is active it needs a different value volume pot than a passive (here's assuming you want a passive in the neck pos.), so you would probs have to have two volume pots. other than that should be fine. Quote
Hughes Posted November 18, 2005 Author Report Posted November 18, 2005 is there any good sounding active pickups that could make clean sound nice and crisp? Quote
Mattia Posted November 18, 2005 Report Posted November 18, 2005 is there any good sounding active pickups that could make clean sound nice and crisp? ← What, precisely, is wrong with an EMG 85 for 'nice and crisp'? Yeah, they're quite 'neutral', but they don't only sound decent when pumping at high output, y'know. Quote
Maiden69 Posted November 18, 2005 Report Posted November 18, 2005 EMG 85, EMG 89 for single coil and 85 hum sound, EMG 60 depending on the kinda clear sound you want. Quote
Bytrix Posted November 18, 2005 Report Posted November 18, 2005 I was going to suggest an EMG89.. or look at alternatives to EMGs (SD Invader?) then you could combine it with any other passive pickup you want. Quote
GodBlessTexas Posted November 18, 2005 Report Posted November 18, 2005 Mattia, EMG's description of the 85's "beefy bottom end and fat top end" probably doesn't equate to a "nice and crisp" clean sound, but again that's subjective depending upon taste. I personally like more treble and high-mids in my clean sound. Hughes, you don't describe the guitar you're putting them in, but most people use the 81 in the bridge and an 85 or 89 in the neck. Some people do 81's in both. The only real difference in the 85 and the 89 is that the 89 is a dual-mode pickup that will sound like an SA single coil in that mode, and very similar to an 85 in dual mode. I personally prefer the S single coil sound, which is what I have in my Strat, but the SA isn't bad. It has more midrange than the S. If you just want a single coil sound that is more crisp, the EMG H (not to be confused with the H4 and HZ passive pickups) is an EMG S single coil in a humbucker body, and would work well in the neck. So, in summary, I'd go with an 81 in the bridge and either an 89 in the neck with a push/pull pot (included) for the switching modes, or an 81 in the bridge with an H in the neck. Either should get you what you want. Or, if you change your pickup routing and go H/S/S, you can do an 81 in the bridge with an S and SA in the mid and neck positions for some awesome tonal flexibility. I would honestly stick with a full EMG setup unless you want to deal with headaches involved in trying to put both in. Remember the Alamo, and God Bless Texas... Quote
Hughes Posted November 19, 2005 Author Report Posted November 19, 2005 well im making a mockingbird which is going to be a mahogany body with a quilt maple top and a birdseye maple neck. im looking to stick a nice smooth sounding pickup in the neck because thats what i switch to when i play clean, then i switch to the bridge for distortion...i probably will end up putting 81 and an 85 in but i just wanted some other options Quote
Hughes Posted November 19, 2005 Author Report Posted November 19, 2005 I think i might go with the Seymour Duncan Hot Rodded Humbucker Guitar Pickup Set (Jazz and JB) i hear they are good for both clean and distortion...only $125 for the set also Quote
crafty Posted November 19, 2005 Report Posted November 19, 2005 Can't really go wrong with the 81/85 or the JB/Jazz combos. Both combos have probably recorded more tracks than any other setups out there. Think about what you're going to use the guitar for most of the time, how simple of an installation you want, and what kind of maintenance you want to deal with. Both setups will sound great either clean or with overdrive, but if you're going through a bunch of effects, the EMGs will give a cleaner, more consistent signal all the way to the amp or board. The EMGs also come mostly pre-assembled with very little soldering needed and the pickups are encapsulated in epoxy, so there's no chance of them ever really wearing out, but that comes at the cost of sounding too "hi-fi" and sterile. The Duncans can be a little more versatile and you can play with your cap and pot values to change up the tone, and there's no battery to replace. But there's passive noise to deal with, signal chain breakup, a bit more complicated initial setup, and the dreaded Ground of Death, but passive pickups can be a little sweeter on the ears for traditional sounds. Give it some thought. Quote
Hughes Posted November 19, 2005 Author Report Posted November 19, 2005 the part i like is that they are both used ALOT...but the SDs are about half the price sooo...i love the looks of the EMGs but looks mean nothing alot of the times Quote
Maiden69 Posted November 19, 2005 Report Posted November 19, 2005 What you save in price you pay in extras. Shielding for the cavities, some noise at high levels, not a big deal, and the SD choice is good, I had them before in both my Epi and a different set up in my strat but once I changed to EMG... I think it is hard to go back unless I'm looking for an especific sound. Quote
Hughes Posted November 19, 2005 Author Report Posted November 19, 2005 (edited) ack ive been hearing so much good news from both.....to hard to choose... sooo with the EMGs you dont need copper shielding but the SDs shuld have them? Edited November 19, 2005 by Hughes Quote
Mattia Posted November 19, 2005 Report Posted November 19, 2005 My first guitar has EMGs, and while I don't dislike the sound, I doubt I'll ever build another guitar with them, at least not for personal use. They lack the character I want, and don't suit the music I play (amp distortion, generally not too much of it, very few effects). Quote
Hughes Posted November 19, 2005 Author Report Posted November 19, 2005 well the only thing i use now is a spider II amp effects...im gonig to buy a RP50 soon though just to have. Quote
Jivin Posted November 19, 2005 Report Posted November 19, 2005 When your talking about clean sounds, you really just need to go down to a guitar store or borrow a mates guitar and just muck around with the EMG's as they really do have their own type of clean sound. For the neck position, it doesn't really matter what pickup you try, whether it be the 81, 85, 60 or SA, you will still get the idea of what an EMG pickup sounds like clean. You can definitely hear what people label as the 'sterile' sound. I personally don't have a problem with it, and I love the sound my EMG's dish out, but I would suggest you know it before you go ahead and buy a set. Also, when your comparing EMG's and SD's, as Maiden more or less said, I would advice you dont make the decision based on price, as the difference is that huge as far as I have seen, and it should really be based more on what sound you are after. If you're happy with the clean sound EMG's give, then I would say go for it, because the sound of EMG's under gain is extraordinary in my opinion and I might even suggest you go the 81/89 combo because I find the SA has a slightly more manageable clean sound (and the 85 is definitely smooth, so both in one package would be a good choice). If your unsure about the 'EMG clean', then maybe the Seymour Duncans might be worth the safer choice. Make sure you let us know what you decide to do - it would be interesting to find out what you end up going for. - Dan PS: Just to clarify, im not saying that all EMG pickups have the same clean sound. They all have their tonal differences, however my point was that they all share that same.... sound... thingy... that makes them very recognisable as EMG's Quote
Pr3Va1L Posted November 19, 2005 Report Posted November 19, 2005 well, has anyone tought of bartolinis? They do break the bank, but I think they have some active models that would totally do the job! Quote
crafty Posted November 20, 2005 Report Posted November 20, 2005 I think if you're running through all those digital effects you'll do better with the EMGs. Those processors love active pickups with strong, consistent signals. Quote
Jivin Posted November 20, 2005 Report Posted November 20, 2005 well, has anyone tought of bartolinis? They do break the bank, but I think they have some active models that would totally do the job! ← Now that you mention it, they aren't that expensive really More than Seymour Duncans and less than EMG's, but without any of the extras EMG's come with (to my knowledge). I have never actually bought a set of Bartolini's, but when I emailed them to ask for advice some time ago I was recommended the ZBS-80 in the bridge and the ZBS-75 in the neck, and that was for a guitar which I wanted primarily for hard rock/metal, but I also wanted it to be able to hold its own for clean sounds. That was the advice I was given anyway. http://www.starspickups.com/ZBSelectric.php http://store.pickupcentral.com/bartolini.html - Dan PS: It looks like that pickupcentral store doesn't stock as many bartolini guitar pickups as they used to... but I get the impression starspickups sells them, so maybe you could email them for pricing. Quote
akpunk_rocker Posted November 20, 2005 Report Posted November 20, 2005 I am curious how to wire in a emg 81. I have standard pots from a strat will they work with an 81? or do i need emg pots, also i've already wired it up according to the diagram on emginc.com and for some reason if plug the input jack in half way i get sound and all the way in no sound? got any idea's as to WHY? e-mail me back at kimberlee_n_john@yahoo.com thanx-john Quote
lovekraft Posted November 20, 2005 Report Posted November 20, 2005 I have standard pots from a strat will they work with an 81?They will work (after a fashion), but they're far from optimal - you need to replace them with 25K pots to match the pickups. ...for some reason if plug the input jack in half way i get sound and all the way in no sound?You've screwed up the wiring on the stereo jack - take a closer look at that wiring diagram and try it again. Quote
GodBlessTexas Posted November 21, 2005 Report Posted November 21, 2005 ...for some reason if plug the input jack in half way i get sound and all the way in no sound?You've screwed up the wiring on the stereo jack - take a closer look at that wiring diagram and try it again. ← And it's not hard to do either if you have the older EMG paper diagrams. If you look at the stereo output jack with the inside facing you (the side with the prongs) there should be three lugs, the middle lug is ground. The lug immediately to the left (clockwise) of the ground lug is negative from the battery clip, and lug immediately to the right (counter clockwise) of the ground lug is signal hot. I picked up a couple of older sets of EMG pickups before the quick connect, and almost always wired the output jacks correctly because of how poorly they are represented in the paper diagrams. The newer diagrams online are well done though. Remember the Alamo, and God Bless Texas... Quote
Hughes Posted November 22, 2005 Author Report Posted November 22, 2005 i have a feeling ill end up with the SDs...i really like the looks of EMGs though, anyone know where i can find epoxy pickup covers like emgs use? Quote
GodBlessTexas Posted November 22, 2005 Report Posted November 22, 2005 There's always someone on eBay selling covers. Check here. Remember the Alamo, and God Bless Texas... Quote
Slabbefusk Posted November 22, 2005 Report Posted November 22, 2005 EMG60's have a really nice clean and warm tone. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.