rubber314chicken Posted June 27, 2007 Report Posted June 27, 2007 would a double action be overkill for a non laminated neck? the neck is a little on the thin side, so I'm planning on just having a single action truss rod, as I see no need for a double action. would there be a need for a double action? and on the hotrods, is the length the overall length? like it the 18" rod 18" exactly, or is it longer/shorter? Quote
SwedishLuthier Posted June 27, 2007 Report Posted June 27, 2007 I always use a double action trus rod. Having said that I almost never use "the second action" but it is there as an insurance. Quote
MP63 Posted June 27, 2007 Report Posted June 27, 2007 (edited) I like the double-action rods too. In case you have the neck back bow, due to climate changes or install fat frets with light strings. It is slim that it'll happen, but if it does, you have a way to adjust the neck.... Oh, and wait for the rod to show up. That way you'll have the exact length, in case there is a slight variation. Edited June 27, 2007 by MP63 Quote
rubber314chicken Posted June 28, 2007 Author Report Posted June 28, 2007 (edited) ok, thanks for the input. ...Oh, and wait for the rod to show up. That way you'll have the exact length, in case there is a slight variation. yeah, I know that, but I want to make sure it isn't too long that it extends beyond my fretboard... Edited June 28, 2007 by rubber314chicken Quote
j. pierce Posted June 28, 2007 Report Posted June 28, 2007 I don't know if the hot-rods are like this, but the 18" rods I've gotten from LMI are 18" overall length - that includes the length for the adjusting nut, much of which is actually in the headstock and not under the board (at least, the way I build my angled-stock necks.) So for an 18" rod, I actually only end up needing to worry about a bit over 17" actually fitting under my board. Quote
tubab0y Posted June 28, 2007 Report Posted June 28, 2007 the ones from stewmac are a bit longer, but it's still plenty short- with 24 frets, i have about an extra inch. Quote
rubber314chicken Posted June 28, 2007 Author Report Posted June 28, 2007 ok, thanks. that helps a lot Quote
jmrentis Posted June 28, 2007 Report Posted June 28, 2007 (edited) Just a quick question regarding trus rods. What is the appeal of the spoke truss rods? I read that it can be turned without an allen key, but aside from that, are there more benefits. I hear many people getting them and looking for them and was wondering why. Part of why I ask is sometimes I see the cut in the fretboard to use the spoke and I wonder if these people like the look or are sacrificing for some benefits of the spoke that I am unaware of? Because, honestly, I don't like missing out on the good stuff. So, any opinions on spoked truss rods would be very much appreciated. J Edited June 28, 2007 by jmrentis Quote
soapbarstrat Posted June 28, 2007 Report Posted June 28, 2007 Just easier access. That is if the "spoke t-rod" is the same thing I'm thinking of. And I feel it's even easier access than a headstock adjustment style, because the strings move out of the way easier at the body end of the neck. I always use the allen wrench for a floyd locking nut to stick into one of the holes and then turn the "nut". I would never want a 2 way rod in any of my personal guitars. Quote
DJMhr Posted June 28, 2007 Report Posted June 28, 2007 I picked up a Gretsch baritone real cheap off Ebay a couple months ago, mainly on account of a broken single-action truss rod. The previous owner overtightened it. As a result the fretboard surface & neck had way too much relief. I replaced the broken rod with a double-action "Hot Rod" which enabled the neck to straighten out very nicely. Being able to adjust the rod both directions proved to be a Godsend in this case. Quote
biliousfrog Posted June 28, 2007 Report Posted June 28, 2007 the most apparent benefit of a spoke wheel rod is that you don't weaken the headstock by creating a space for the rod adjustment. So you get the benefit of a heel adjustment without the usual access problems that traditional heel adjustment rods have. Quote
tubab0y Posted June 28, 2007 Report Posted June 28, 2007 it's easier to adjust, easier to put in in the first place (with a scarf joint, at least), looks better, doesn't weaken up the headstock, doesn't take up any space on the headstock. lots of reasons. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.