Keegan Posted April 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 14, 2009 Yeah, I know they can all split. I was wondering if you could point me in the direction of some especially well-suited pickups for split/parallel sounds. Hmm, both parallel might be a little tricky. I guess since it's two pole I'd just put the hots from both coils on one side and the grounds on the other? Then splitting the coils is easy.. I'm sure I can figure it out...going to be a lot of wires on that switch though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anderekel Posted April 14, 2009 Report Share Posted April 14, 2009 One of the Rio Grande pickups is supposed to sound very good when split, can't remember it off the top of my head though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wood is good Posted April 14, 2009 Report Share Posted April 14, 2009 Has anyone here tried an EMG 89? Not being a butt here or anything, but... The 89 is the standard bridge EMG humbucker, and has been for the last 25+ years. It's pretty well documented. WOAH WOAH WOAH WOAH!!! Incorrect. The Emg 81 is the one thats been around for a while. The 89 is a neck pickup, and has not been around that long. Its the only coil tapapable EMG. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j. pierce Posted April 14, 2009 Report Share Posted April 14, 2009 I really like a lot of Dimarzio's offerings for splitting and such - I'm not a huge fan of the single coil of a humbucker sound on it's own, (although it does have it's uses) but do like using one coil each from two splittable humbuckers. But I've found a lot of Dimarzio's pickups (I particularly like their minihumbucker) offer a couple of really cool and distinct sounds when switching between series and parallel wiring. I know there's a lot of cool stuff out their now, but I've been using their pickups for ages now; before the boutique market really took off. I prefer their lower gain stuff, like their Air Classic. Their higher-power stuff gets a more useable single-coil tone when using only one coil, but I don't care as much for the tone of the humbucker settings on the higher-output pickups, but that's just my preference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westhemann Posted April 14, 2009 Report Share Posted April 14, 2009 I don't like the usual clear laquer over natural wood, I think it looks bland, I agree. WOAH WOAH WOAH WOAH!!! Incorrect. The Emg 81 is the one thats been around for a while. The 89 is a neck pickup, and has not been around that long. Its the only coil tapapable EMG. wood is good is correct...the 89 is a neck pup..but it WAS the only coil tappable emg...now they offer the 81 as well that way. http://www.emginc.com/products/index/190 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avengers63 Posted April 14, 2009 Report Share Posted April 14, 2009 I stand corrected about the 81/89. If you're going with a DiMarzio, you really can't go wrong with a Super Distortion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keegan Posted April 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 14, 2009 The problem with the super distortion is that you wind up with a small <7k ceramic single coil when you split it, and that sounds like it would probably be in ice-pick territory. Maybe the Dual Sound though, since it's a Super Distortion that's been specifically designed to be split. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narcissism Posted April 14, 2009 Report Share Posted April 14, 2009 (edited) I've got an 81/89 set. If you want a good example of it in action, just look for a zakk wylde solo where he plays with the knobs and switches on his guitar a lot. The 81 is the weedeeleeedeedeelee/waadaalaaadaadaalaa sounding one, and the 89 is the woodooloowoodooloo sounding one... Sorry, I think words like "warm" and "bell like" are kind of inadequate ways to describe tone lol. But I'd say one of those live solos are a pretty good example. edit: He uses a wah for accent, so look for one where there's no wah. Edited April 14, 2009 by Narcissism Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chops1983 Posted April 14, 2009 Report Share Posted April 14, 2009 I have a dimarzio super distortion in the bridge of my guitar and it really is a cracking p/up. Swedish Luthier put me on to wiring the p/up series to parallel instead of a clean split. The benefits are you still get the s/coils sounds when in parallel but the humbucker is still hum cancelling and you don't have to take a volume drop when activated. Here is a schematic. Obviously you only have 1 p/up,1 vol and 1 tone so just delete what you don't need on this schematic. series/parallel Chad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dude Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 (edited) I've got an 81/89 set. If you want a good example of it in action, just look for a zakk wylde solo where he plays with the knobs and switches on his guitar a lot. The 81 is the weedeeleeedeedeelee/waadaalaaadaadaalaa sounding one, and the 89 is the woodooloowoodooloo sounding one... Sorry, I think words like "warm" and "bell like" are kind of inadequate ways to describe tone lol. I honestly laughed aloud when I read that. Seriously, that's probably the best description of their tone I've ever heard. You're right, It definitely trumps "warm" or "bell-like." edit: I thought Wylde played on 81/85 usually. Am I wrong? Edited April 15, 2009 by dude Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narcissism Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 You're right about Wilde using an 85 in the neck, but the discription on EMG's website says that the 89 is similar to the 85 in dual coil mode, where it sounds more like a strat in single coil mode. So I guess that's a bad example since I don't have any real experience with an 89. Crazy pickups and their numbers... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keegan Posted April 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 (edited) Thanks. Think I'm going to go with the Tone Zone with a series/parallel/north/south switch and maybe another switch for selecting the tone caps(one cap, no load, two caps in series). What value of tone cap do you need for humbuckers? Is it different than single coils? Right now I have a .022 with two 500k controls on my bridge p-90 and the 0 on the tone is plenty bassy for me. Should I stick with that value for a humbucker or go even lower because a humbucker will have less treble? Edited April 18, 2009 by Keegan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keegan Posted April 21, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 (edited) Got the first coat of oil on it. Not too shabby for my first.. Edited April 21, 2009 by Keegan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dpm99 Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 Not too shabby for my first.. Agreed. Nice work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keegan Posted April 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 This oil is taking forever to dry. First coat is just now getting tacky. Granted I did put it on at like 55 degrees and it's been sitting at only around 65-70 ever since. Once it's dry would it be safe to use 600 grit to smooth it before putting on another coat? Or should I use scotch brite/1200 grit/0000 steel wool? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattharris75 Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 It's looking really nice, but what kind of oil did you use that it's still tacky after this long? And why only 3 holes for securing the neck? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keegan Posted April 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 (edited) Watco Danish Oil. And because I haven't placed the 4th one yet. edit: Yeah, it was just the temperature I put it on at. This time it was like 70 and it tacked up within 45 minutes. Also helped that this coat was on top of the wood instead of in the wood. Edited April 22, 2009 by Keegan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peterbrown Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 Hey Keegan, When I apply danish oil, I often apply it with 600 wet and dry. I use the oil as a lubricant for the sanding, and wipe off the excess, and you have another coat of oil done. Just a sugestion. Cheers, Peter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keegan Posted April 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 Thanks. I just bought some 600 to do just that before you posted. I read your mind or something Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cam Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 nice work, especially the top, you can't even tell its 4 piece! Don't you hate dad's that don't trust you or don't think you can do it by yourself. Build is looking great, keep up the good work Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keegan Posted May 5, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 (edited) Electronics ordered and on the way. Now all I need is a bridge, nut, tuners, and strings and it'll be ready to go. I'm just going to re-use the neck off my MIM strat that I took apart. Tapping the heel gives a nice tight percussive vibration. Not quite as much sustain as my Junior, but better than the MIM the neck came off of. I have a feeling it's going to be very quacky. edit: Electronics all wired up and working, woo. Edited May 10, 2009 by Keegan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keegan Posted April 19, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 Stopped work on this build awhile back. The pickup was routed crooked and after making some measurements I found that the template was wrong and so the pickup was also where the bridge would need to be. Also, the heel got jacked up during sanding due to a lack of tools/work space(trying to sand a guitar with a random orbit sander on a rickety table is a very bad idea). The shape is also a little wonky, something happened in transferring the paper template to wood. :/ Now that summer is back I'll have free time to work on it again, so my options from here are: 1) Scrap the body and start from an unfinished walnut tele prefab I found for $100 2) Attempt to fix, but this will require an opaque finish, since the pickup hole will have to be filled and the heel will have to be chopped off and a new one glued on. I'll probably get all kinds of issues with trying to get lacquer to adhere on top of an oil finish, too. Probably more pain and more money. 3) Something else Keep in mind, the only tools I have are a small(as in you can't reach the center of the guitar) drill press, a cheap 8" band saw that doesn't cut anywhere near straight, a jigsaw, a router, and whatever I can get done with tools at Woodcraft for $35 an hour. Realistically I probably shouldn't have tried to tackle this in the first place with those tools, especially without a proper work space(half of the one bench in the garage that isn't covered in junk), but I thought a body would be relatively easy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Our Souls inc. Posted April 19, 2010 Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 You have a jigsaw and a router. I just made a bass over a weekend with those same tools by using a pre-fab neck. I've built a bunch of others without much more than that..... A belt sander, a rasp , some knives and blades , misc. abrasive items and determination. You cane do eet!..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keegan Posted April 19, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 (edited) Yeah well I'm unfortunate enough not to have any talent or experience, haha Actually it probably would have gone better if I had hand tools instead of limited power tools =/ A rasp especially. But yeah, what would you guys recommend? I'm thinking maybe I got myself in too deep trying to start from scratch on a body with no prior experience and should start with what would basically amount to a kit. A body just needing finishing and drilling and a complete neck. Then work my way up to building from scratch. Maybe take on some easier woodworking first and build up a collection of tools.. Edited April 19, 2010 by Keegan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reinhold Posted April 19, 2010 Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 Maybe a Warmoth pre-routed body blank would be better for you? All you would have to do is rough-cut the shape then sand it down to however you like it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.