jhonny dirtyn Posted February 9, 2009 Report Share Posted February 9, 2009 we initiate a new firm and this would be our logo.we ask opinions Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAI6 Posted February 9, 2009 Report Share Posted February 9, 2009 The type is just too tight, too squeezed together. Also, Why "RGR"? I see that you capitalized the "R" in "GuitaR", so I guess that's where the 2nd "R" in "RGR" comes from. But why? The "RGR" logo works, but it's based on something illogical... R GuitaRs. The bird itself is nice, and looks great. Based on some ones tattoo? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhonny dirtyn Posted February 9, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 9, 2009 The type is just too tight, too squeezed together. Also, Why "RGR"? I see that you capitalized the "R" in "GuitaR", so I guess that's where the 2nd "R" in "RGR" comes from. But why? The "RGR" logo works, but it's based on something illogical... R GuitaRs. The bird itself is nice, and looks great. Based on some ones tattoo? Thx.Yeah the bird is a tattoo in my back:) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotYou Posted February 9, 2009 Report Share Posted February 9, 2009 (edited) I like the design, but keep in mind what it's going to be like trying to inlay that on every guitar. Making a simple design will also help it be more immediately recognizable. Edited February 9, 2009 by NotYou Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ihocky2 Posted February 9, 2009 Report Share Posted February 9, 2009 +1 Think about the shape and size of your headstock with tuners and trussrod cover. There is only a limited amount of space on there for a logo. That one looks good for a manual cover or something, but not on a headstock. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.