Jump to content

Fix of Cheap ES533 Clone from Guitar Fetish


Recommended Posts

I was playing it this morning, sounded nice.  I also notice that GF has a 'B Stock' version of this here https://www.guitarfetish.com/B-STOCK--LIMITED-OPPORTUNITY-Semi-Hollow-SETNECK-BELOW-COST-Cherry-Red-Two-Humbuckers--TWISTED-NECK_p_41726.html complete with twisted neck :( 

I guess I was lucky that I got a 'good' one.

Mine looks extremely like this one https://www.amazon.com/Best-Choice-Products-Semi-Hollow-Electronic/dp/B08CS2GFDW/ref=sr_1_9?dchild=1&keywords=epiphone%2Bes335&qid=1616587972&s=musical-instruments&sr=1-9&th=1 including the square fret markers and a fret-1 square.  Seems for spending another $5 (actually less as I'd get free shipping from Amazon which I didn't from GF), I could have saved myself a load of trouble.

Sigh!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Gandalf_Sr said:

the square fret markers and a fret-1 square. 

Gibson has made them as well so that's not a sign of that particular make. Keep believing that yours might be salvaged from a Gibby subcontractor, it'll make you happier! The world is full of lookalike Far East made guitars, telling the real manufacturer by just a single square dot is not possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Gandalf_Sr said:

when I put Gibson decals on the headstock

Wouldn't that count as forgery? How about decals that look like Gibson but under closer inspection aren't? Like kuva.png.28984f175d00cb7ee3e61e08180e24fb.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Gandalf_Sr said:

Forgery? YOU'RE the one telling me to believe that it's a Gibby factory reject. 

Hehe... I'm saying it might be and that believing so you might have a more positive attitude to the instrument which in turns would make you play more which in turns will make you happier.

That's basic kitchen psychology to raise your level of motivation. If we made you think that you've paid overprice for a rejected Malaysian copy worth a tenner you'd feel bad, wouldn't you? You'd also lose your interest to make it the best guitar you've ever had. Believing it might, just might be a real Gibby reject has already made you learn some valuable fret issue fixing skills - something that easily could cost a couple hundreds done by a professional.

There's a reason why it doesn't say Gibson or any other name on the headstock. Let's accept that and make the guitar as good as can be!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL, keep up the kitchen psychology, it's making me feel much better.  Once I get those Gibson decals on the headstock and the fake orange label glued in, my belief will be complete and transform my playing such that I will be indistinguishable from George Benson! (OK, I clearly need more help; I will come to next week's session).

Next time I'm in Finland, I'm buying the beers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been 250 miles away from home getting my second Covid 19 jab but will be back on Thursday.

More online searching leads me to strongly suspect that my guitar is a reject Ibanez Artcore Series AS73; the way the 'f' holes are painted white on the inside edges and the square fret zero marker are exactly the same; the main difference is a slightly different shaped protector panel.

A load of stuff has arrived while I have been away including:

  • New Tusq nut
  • Flatwound 11 Chrome strings
  • Roller saddle bridge
  • Diamond fret file and set of erasers

There appears to be some fret buzz on the thicker strings but, through the amp, it's barely noticeable.  The current (old) nut is pretty low but any thoughts to what the fret 1 clearance should be and what is the state for measurement?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Gandalf_Sr said:

More online searching leads me to strongly suspect that my guitar is a reject Ibanez Artcore Series AS73.

The Artcore F-holes are pretty distinctive. The centre section of each scroll is less ornate and more open than a typical F-hole. While it's possible I'm not sure you can immediately assume it's a factory second of any known brand. It's more likely to just be another clone of a familiar model pumped out by one of many Chinese factories.

 

13 minutes ago, Gandalf_Sr said:

any thoughts to what the fret 1 clearance should be and what is the state for measurement

Rough and ready method is to depress the string at the thrid fret such that the string contacts the second fret as it deflects back towards the nut. If you can just see daylight between the top of the first fret and the string it's probably about right.

With your free hand you can also tap the string above the first fret while the string is held at the second/third - if you can hear the 'chink' sound of the string hitting the fret top you've got a tiny gap required for first fret clearance.

Anything more accurate than that will require a set of feeler gauges, but the method of checking is roughly the same as checking for daylight under the string passing over 1st fret. Somewhere in the region of 0.004" - 0.007" clearance should be good.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks; Tusq gave me the same guidance as you, press at 3rd fret and then measure clearance of 0.01" at the low E and 0.006" at the high E for fret 1.

I'm an engineer and have some good tools including feeler gages, digital calipers, and a diamond nut file set.

I would normally check the fret 1 height with no strings pressed but I guess that leaves me open to all the variance from neck relief. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Gandalf_Sr said:

I would normally check the fret 1 height with no strings pressed but I guess that leaves me open to all the variance from neck relief. 

Correct. Without limiting the string height near the nut using the 'second fretted' method your string action measurement is at the mercy of other contributing factors, such as the action at the bridge or the amount of neck relief.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks curtisa, so you think that the method you suggest is safe to work with for the purposes of filing the nut down; is that right?

Just so people can have an idea of what the body of mine looks like while I rant on about who I guess made it, I've attached a (not very good) picture here.

IMG_7002.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Gandalf_Sr said:

so you think that the method you suggest is safe to work with for the purposes of filing the nut down; is that right?

Should be. It's an iterative process - check height, remove string, file slot, replace string, check height, repeat. Your only kicker is to go carefully and slowly with the filing, because as soon as you go too far...well, you've gone too far ;)

Stewmac make a nut slotting contraption where you can clamp feeler gauges up against the nut to stop you filing too deeply. I guess you could cobble together your own version out of whatever shim material you can lay your hands on?

 

9 minutes ago, Gandalf_Sr said:

if it's made by/for Ibanez, it's an AS53

Still don't see it. The AS53 has kinda pointy cutaway tips whereas yours appears more rounded and curvy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems there's ES-339's with rectangular fret markers been recently made. The white edges of the f-holes weren't found in a quick google search.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Bizman62 said:

It seems there's ES-339's with rectangular fret markers been recently made. The white edges of the f-holes weren't found in a quick google search.

Hmmm, I looked for white edges of the f-holes and found them in many cheap clones like the Indio but the Ibanez AS73 also has them.  I also too measurements of my guitar's body and found it's closer to the 335 than the 339.  Mine is 16.5 inches at the widest point, the 'waist' is 9 inches, and 19 inches from the tip of the 'ears' to the bottom.  Full length is 42 inches.  I looked at the Gibson and Epiphone web sites but neither gives those dimensions but I did find this http://es.gibson.com/News-Lifestyle/Features/en-us/Compare-The-ES-335-And-ES-339.aspx

Now I'm back home (was away last week) and all the parts I ordered have arrived: new Tusq nut, roller bridge, and Chrome 11 flatwound strings.

At the risk of gilding the turd, I'm trying to make this particular guitar work as it just feels (and sounds) right in my hands; I own a Gretsch G2622T Streamliner but it's slightly too big and the nut seems slightly too far away from me meaning that my beginner hands struggle to get the right angle on the low frets.

On reflection, I might have been (might still be) better going for an Epiphone ES-335 Pro which can be had in the US for around $500.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm back home and have finished the changes to my mystery guitar. I think it's a nice guitar now but I wouldn't recommend that you buy one; it's just more work than it's worth and, if you got one that had a serious issue like a twisted neck, I think you'd be stuck with a dud.

The exercise has added to my luthier skills and equipment and allowed me to work on a guitar that was not very expensive.

Thanks to all here for your help and advice.

IMG_7020.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Gandalf_Sr said:

I think it's a nice guitar now

That's nice to read! Goes to show that "a little" love and affection can make a poor guitar good.

19 minutes ago, Gandalf_Sr said:

...but I wouldn't recommend that you buy one; it's just more work than it's worth...

The exercise has added to my luthier skills and equipment and allowed me to work on a guitar that was not very expensive.

It's definitely not for everyone, that's true, and if you count the hours it's most likely not worth it. Then again, if you count the hours as a payment for learning new skills the cost is not that big. Think of this as having participated on a correspondence course! A diploma can be made if you so wish! -Similarly you can consider this as a hobby experiment. A day at a ski resort including rental of equipment and participating a tutorial may cost more than what you've invested in tools you now own.

As it's pretty and plays well, you've managed to get yourself a good guitar including full setup for a reasonable price!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, I don't really do diplomas although I do have a BSc (Bachelor of Science), I'm really an electronics guy - old and close to retirement - I have a couple of prototype pedals I've made (Germanium Fuzz Pedal and Compressor) if anyone's interested?  Is there an electronics/pedal section here?

The more research I do, the more it seems like this cheap guitar was originally made for Epiphone, clues that point in that direction so far are:

  1. The screw in the pickguard - Gibsons don't have a screw
  2. Three screws on the truss rod cover - Gibsons have 2 both on the center line of the neck
  3. Unpainted interior and white edges on the 'f' holes

Anyway, it really doesn't matter, I like the guitar and would reveal the full history of where it came from if I ever sold it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...