Jump to content

demon

Members
  • Posts

    59
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About demon

  • Birthday 11/11/1980

Profile Information

  • Location
    arbroath, scotland
  • Interests
    Cant say I'm that interesting, but I love customising and building guitars. I've just started up a business in scotland doing just that. I do a lot of airbrush work, as well as wood work, carving, etc. In my spare time I shoot and ride my mountain bike and play in my band. I'm a bassist although I started on guitar. Im really really bad on guitar though. Bass suits me better!

demon's Achievements

Enthusiast

Enthusiast (6/14)

  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Conversation Starter
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. its not what you think lol. ive got an EKO ranger that sin very bad nick an im plannin on restorin it. ive read that sanding is not a good technique for acoustics due to the thinness of the wood. the old finish is VERY thick though, and strippers that ive tried have barely blistered it. any reccomendations on something that i can easily get in scotland?
  2. cheers guys. That pic that metal matt has posted of the annihilator is perfect to get reasonably accurate drawings from. They wont be exact or probably dimensionally correct. No chance i'll be able to afford a graphite neck, but i'll just make a wood neck. Not sure what i'll do for pickups, hmmm, i'm thinking out loud here, but what about 7 strings and a dimarzio evolution7, or maybe EMG active pups........
  3. does anyone know what the guitar that the guy from misfits uses. it kinda looks like a neal moser design. Its the one that is in the scream video. Also does anyone know if it would be possible to get templates for makin one? EDIT: I think its a Rand Annihilator, but i cant find anything when i search for it.
  4. thanks guys, thats what i was needing to know. Dunno if i'm gonna bother changing the electrics on it. I was originally just goin to set up the action so that my mate could use it while i was working on his other guitar. but then I decided I was gonna do a freebie swirl job on it. (his other guitars a freebie job to! still, i need to build up my portfolio!) I love the body shape on it though, dunno what it is about it, but i think its cool! It looks the same as the guitar in LGM's first link, but doesnt have a scratchplate, or a spring cavity in the back (the trem is all self contained, tiny springs are under the block of the tre itself and attatched to the frame of it and theres a built in roller bridge) The existing body colour is white so I think that the swirl paint job will look pretty smart on it, cos the colours should be nice and bright. I'll post some pics in the inlays and finishing section when I'm done. havent had much luck finding paint that works well for dipping yet though..... oh yeah, the headstock is the other way round on to LGM's pic
  5. ok, maybe im getting better at this whole internet thing....Its from 1986-87. still nothing on value though
  6. I have now narrowed it down to a guitar after 1977. i still cant find anything at all on the cat series....... oh yeah, its japanese, as im sure you gentlemen will want to take the piss out of me for saying it was probably american.
  7. I promised to do some pretty fancy artwork on my mates guitar. So he wouldnt be without a guitar while I am working on it he gave me an old guitar to set up. The headstock decal says Aria Pro II the cat series. The body is quite curvy and I actually really like it. Its fitted with a kahler flyer tremolo, and locking nut and H/s/s pup config. The tone knob has a push pull thing on it to split the coils on the humbucker. The funny thing is theyve obviously gone to a reasonable amount of effort with the hardware, but the body is made of plywood. doesnt make sense to me. Does anyone have any idea of where i could get a rough value of this guitar (my mate asked me to, but i cant find any info anywhere) im guessing its an american guitar, and its abviously pretty old, but thats about as much as i know. ill try and post a pic soon (im still using 35mm). was thinking of puttin a swirl finish on it, it would really look sweet with that body shape
  8. is this guitar worth keeping original? I assumed that they were cheapo guitars and it didnt really matter whether i made a mess of it or not. Anyway, although the crackes do give it character to some extent, the finish on it is in a horrendous state, the cracks are massive, and cover the whole guitar, plus the lacquer has gone cloudy on the neck and parts of the body, so you cant even see the grain of the wood. Anyway, its too late, I've already taken the top of
  9. cheers, like i said have never workied on an acoustic before so it will be a good learning experience, even if i make a mess of it. This things got a bolt on neck as well, so that should make things a bit easier (Even though the screw heads are massively tight and i cant budge them....) I take it that the old bindings and top will just come of with a little gentle persuasion. Ie No steaming
  10. meant to say though, the top will need replacing anyway, cos theres a hole in it at the top. Could anyone possibly let me know hoe i would go about this. Cant find any tutorials on it.
  11. i ripped out the frets on my p-bass to make it a fretless. It had a maple neck as well. It actually played not too bad after a couple of adjustments. Thing is it looks horrible, although I got the frets out very cleanly, it is hard to get the fretlines filled well enough to not be seen too much. In the end I bought an ebony fretboard and lifted the maple one off, replacing it with the ebony one. dunno bout the other question though.....
  12. HI there guys, i added a reply in another post that may be slightly similar to this one, which I apologise for. I just got a really bad condition EKO. I dont know what model it is cos other than a label inside thats in italian, and says EKO, there is no identification on it. The finish all over is cracked to hell, and will need totally stripped off. Contrary to what i said elsewhere, the top wood itself isnt actually cracked, just the finish (I looked at it with my glasses on ) The bridge is split badly though, a couple of the tuners are knackered to. the side wood (dunno what type it is, I'm no expert) is really nice, kinda of quilted, but a much smaller quilt than quilt maple for instance. I guess from other posts that I've read that you need to use a chemical paint remover for the body wood. but i take it that the neck can be stripped normally (sanded) the finish all over is very thick. Has anyone got any suggestions on how to go about finishing this guitar. I thought about using linseed oil to bring out the nice grain. would this affect the tone adversely? Also, does anyone know where can get a new bridge from? and how do i get the old one off (It seems to be rivetted, rather than screwed/bolted) Tye other thing I wanted to ask, cos i couldnt find it answered elsewhere, was how do i remove the old binding? as the binding is already coming off in places, and it is scratched to hell anyway. I presume these guitars arent really worth all that much, but i would like to make a good job of it all the same as my first acoustic project. (does anyone have an idea of how much they are worth just purely out of interest?) Might even just stick on a piezo bridge if i cant get an original replacement, and make it into an electro acoustic...... Sorry for the long post guys. This seems to have posted a few times. Er sorry guys, it said that it didnt work.............
  13. thats quite odd, I've never really worked on acoustics before, except for making the occasional nut, so I thought id look at the posts to see if some of my questions can be answered before i need to ask them. This is the first post i looked at, I just got an EKO guitar that looks identical to the one in the pic you've posted (the one in the middle ) Its suffering from the same problem, the finish on the neck is cracked to hell, the finish on the back is cracked, the bridge is split and not only the finish on the top, but also the top itself is all split! My dad jst gave it to me, it has been in the bin at the back of his warehouse for months (One of the workers put it there apparently) so he gave it to me for a wee project. I have a feeling it will need compkletely rebuilt, but im gonna look at other posts before i decide on this. Just purely out of interest, i dont mean to hijack your post kevman, but do you know any background on these guitars (ie: are they any good? this one seems quite well put together, nice action and so on (despite being buggered!))
  14. i definately agree with you on that one, the finish you get is absolutely beatiful with the oil, and you dont get that slight resistance to to sliding your hands down the neck that i think you get with lacquers. Is there any special method to getting waxes to adhere to the oiled surface? I remember an RG i did my first natural finish on. I kept changing my mind on what sort of finish to give it, first it was waxed, but it was too much effort to maintain (Much more fun to play than maintain lol) so then i put a linseed finish on it (I'm still not sure whether i prefer a linseed finish or a tung finish) then tried lacquering over it. Of course after a couple of weeks, a lot of the lacquer was rubbed off where my hands and arms were rubbing against it. I jus checked my supplies, and it is pure tung oil that I have got. I suppose Ill just have to be patient and apply many more coats. I actually really enjoy oiling necks. The beautiful sheen that you get with a nicely figured wood really makes it worthwhile. I dont even notice the time going by.
  15. Was wondering how many coats of tung oil it would take to stop the grain lifting on a neck from the sweat off your hands when you play. On most of the necks that I have oiled ive put up to 5 or 6 good coats well rubbed in, and the necks have been beautifully glass smooth, but if ive been holding them by the neck with sweaty hands the grain has lifted slightly giving a rough feel and making re-sanding neccesary.
×
×
  • Create New...