Jump to content

thegarehanman

Blues Tribute Group
  • Posts

    2,814
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by thegarehanman

  1. I'm no expert, but this is how I'd tackle it.

    I'd glue the cap first, countersink the washer holes with a spade bit, then drill the tuner through holes.

    That way your not fighting a wandering spade bit and your centers stay constant.

    Spade bit over forstner because you will get a cleaner edge.

    I disagree, the bottom of a hole cut by a forstener bit is flat, with the exception of the conical hole in the center where the bit's guide drilled deeper. A spade bit however leaves a hole that is deeper on both the sides and center, with really no truely flat place in between. A forstner bit for the recess followed by a brad point bit for the rest of the hole is deffinitely the way to go.

    peace,

    russ

  2. jehle, the blocks at the ends and center will help the rod to act like a normal curved rod, but you're still isolating the force of the rod that's used to counteract the bending of the neck to only 3 spots, whereas a continuous curved strip more evenly distributes the force. Again, this may not make a noticeable difference, especially if you've got a well picked piece of timber for the neck.

  3. Pete,

    Have you considered using very thin superglue to pot your coils? If you're using polypropylene for the temporary bobbin holder, then you wouldn't need to worry about the CA sticking the bobbin to the jig. I think if you saturated the coil well enough, you'd get 100% penetration of the coil. It would also cure rock hard. Just make sure if you try this that you do it in a very well ventilated area (outside) with a decent organic vapor mask.

    peace,

    russ

  4. The thing about a straight rod vs. a curved rod that seems the most difficient, in my opinion, would be the fact that most of the force applied by a straight rod will be focused at the nuts at each end. Whereas a curved rod more evenly applies the force along the length of the neck. This might not be an issue, but I would imagine in a side by side test, you'd see that the curved rod neck is a bit more predictable in terms of truss rod adjustment.

    Have you considered routing a flat bottomed channel for a curved truss rod, then taking a piece of wood wide enough to fill that channel, cutting a long curve in it, gluing the bottom piece into the neck, installing the truss rod, then gluing the top piece into the neck, which in turn gets planed down flush with the neck? I think this would be pretty quick and be much more optimal than a straight rod in an over sized (depth wise) channel.

    peace,

    russ

  5. The one time I did it, I used a PPG etching primer, PPG white basecoat, and PPG clear topcoat. However, I'm inclined to say that you could skip the first two steps if you scuffed up the plastic with some 00 steel wool and tinted your clear top coat white. If you don't have access to a spray gun setup, the enamels that auto part stores sell as "engine paint" or "brake caliper pain" would be an excellent 2nd choice.

    peace,

    russ

  6. I took the rack(the part that goes up and down) out of the arbor press, put it in a vise, drilled a hole in it big enough for the fret caul (of course, start with a small dia. bit and work your way up to the final size in increments of about 1/16"-1/8"), then drilled another hole perpendicular to the previous one which I threaded. I put a set screw in the threaded hole to keep the fret caul secured in the other hole.

    peace,

    russ

  7. If you're going with an LP style neck joint, then yes, you'll need to adjust the carve of the body to suit the neck height and angle that's dictated by both the bridge and pickup heights. Of course, the bridge height should be a function of your dogear p90 heights. If you're going to use a PRS neck joint, then the carve can stay the same and only the neck height and angle will need adjustment.

  8. Ok, well what I was getting at earlier, is that (from both experience and simple geometric logic) regardless of whether your strings form a conical surface or a cylindrical surface, because of the paths of the individual strings and the fact that in almost all situations the strings are slightly(or sometimes dramatically) lower at the nut than the bridge, the fretboard should always have a conical surface to some extent if you're aiming for low action.

    peace,

    russ

  9. Right on, greg. The best design engineers out there realize that the best design is also the simplest, if for no other reasons than it's likely cheaper to make, less likely to break, and easier to operate (with aesthetics, simplicity goes out the window, because otherwise my recent gotm submission would indicate that i'm an awful engineer :D ). Of course, there are tons of other considerations depending on the project, but that's not the point. The ones who can't design well either check gauges at plants or just get a phd and study materials or tribology or something "fun" like that.

    So yeah, neck jigs. :D

×
×
  • Create New...