federaldepot

DUH!! It was just a comparison, wasn't talking about cosmetics at all. A wraparound transfers the vibration thru 2 studs, as a TOM uses either 2 studs or 2 pins directlu into the wood plus 2 studs from the tailpiece. You could say the one or the other is better, but that's just a matter of taste. You can go mechanical enginerring on the issue, but still it comes to personal taste and how you experience the sound. I personally like it if I have a bit bass in my tone, and I like the extra twang and attack which goes with 2 stud bridge constructions like wraparounds. As long as you don't give any hard facts and calculations, I see this just as your own opinion, so comparable to a tone finish debate.... like I tried to say earlier. Anyways, I don't think there are TOMs with the same stud spacing as a wraparound bridge. So my best bet is like others said, just glue in a mahogany dowel with the grain running in the same direction as the bodies grain. But one thing though, the intonation line compared to the lining of the studs on a PRS wraparound is not the same as a TOM. If you'd find a TOM that fits in the original holes, you'd get a problem with your intonation because the saddles won't go foreward enough. Better wrap this up as this is turning into a personal debate instead of a topic of how to do wraparound to TOM conversions A big thanks to verhoevenc rhoads56 crafty Ben SoundAt11 for all the info and help. I've ordered my dowels and hardware and when that shows off to the drill press my guitars go! Thanks guys John

Good luck with that, do you perhaps mean 9cm? Hi Setch, No its 9 inches here in the and I already knew it was a long shot buy sometimes somebody might know something you dont John

Why would you want to order the dowels before you find out if you need them? Measure the holes for the mounting posts, then head over to Stew-Mac and you can likely find a tun-o-matic with the same sized mounting holes unless you're just trying to make this more difficult for yourself or those of us trying to offer suggestions. Also, drilling into dowels is very difficult, as you're drilling directly agains the grain, which is very hard. I'd suggest finding a little block of Mahogany and hand cutting your own dowels with the woodgrain running across them. They would be much easier to drill into. You'll want a drill press for drilling those new stop tailpiece holes to. See why we're suggesting a better wraparound, just bolt it on and be done, no waste of time and possibly screwing up a nice guitar. Hi SoundAt11, A heavy duty drill press is in my possession. It'll bore through 2 inches of metal with ease so I dont think the wood grain will stop it much. Also their is an alternative to te dowels which is wood plugs. Im looking for a tunomatic bridge with that measures 9 inches in length from the left post end to the right one. So far I cant seem to find anything that is a TOM but the same width as a stoptail Any suggestions? John they feel different when playing (fretting). They feel different when you lean on them and palm mute they look different Well I be damned.. they look different ...DUH If he stated that he didn't liked the looks I would have never gave this option! The way he wrote his first sentence it looked like he said a wraparound couldn't act as a TOM, so I showed one that does I can understand the difference in feel when palm muting, but what do you mean with difference in feel when playing (fretting)?? EDIT: BTW federaldepot, the bass doesn't come from the wraparound, it comes from your guitar. The reason that a TOM sounds less bassy is that it probably kills your guitar's tone But like GregP said, it is most likely just voodoo talking, like nitro on a solid body sounds better than poly Hi AlexVDL, To some up my POV. String vibration and the design of a bridge has more to do with mechanical eng. than the tone finish debate which is a cosmetic issue John

they feel different when playing (fretting). They feel different when you lean on them and palm mute they look different Hi rhoads56, You see things the way I do. I notice a much different feel when playing a TON vs a wraparound. Also I notice a much different sound in the gutiars as the TOM allows a greater degree of string vibration becuase of its design. Ive always felt that some of the string vibration was sacraficed by the thickness of the wraparound givingit less treble and mid and more bass Ive already got the mounting plugs out of the guitars. Time to mail order some wood dowels and the hardware! John

Hi Ben I cant do that kind of space age hardware The tried and true for me John

Hi Setch, Been there and done that as far as the intonatable wraparound. Pigtail, Badass and Tonepros (Tonepros and pigtail turned out to be the same thing basically) No, I cant stand it any longer. The intonatable wraparound and I are a love affair gone really bad Thanks! John

Hi Godin SD, Man I cant do it. The wraparound bridge and I are a love affair gone really bad Thanks! John ummm.... ok.... i think the original poster meant "are there any pro's here?" rhoads56, your definately on the same page as I John

Hi Chris Thanks for that info. Based on my measurements and a rough diagram there will be .25 inches of the dowel remaining on either right side of the post holes. I can definately live with that or just use a dab of model airplane paint to touch that area up so it isnt so obvious. My plan is a well playing gutiar with just a very minor color touchup on the stud ends. No need for anything extravagent. As for the comment of the luthiers being a jab at you I ride straight and speak the truth. Innuendo is something I have no use for. It was just a simple question in response to a simple anwer I'll hunt for that the bushing puller thread Thanks again John

3 PRS SE guitars. The Korean models, and no I plan to be able to play the guitars after the mods are done so destroying them isn't an option Any luthiers here on the board? there are only a few tonepro offer a direct replacement bridge that gives you the benefits of adjustable intonation, whilst matching the stud spacing of your guitar. They are reasonably pricey, but cheaper than paying a luthier to convert to tunomatic etc. However, the PRS SE's can easily be converted to tunomatic specs, depending on how well you want the old stud holes filled and repaired. Hi rhoads56, Thanks for the info Can you tell me anything about filling in the old stud holes? How do I extract the metal bushing screw mounts that are in the holes? What kind of material(s) is best to use as a filler? Thanks again!

3 PRS SE guitars. The Korean models, and no I plan to be able to play the guitars after the mods are done so destroying them isn't an option Any luthiers here on the board?

I have reached the end of my days in dealing with the wraparound bridge. It will never live up to the standards that I have come to expect from the Gibson tunomatic bridge I want to convert 3 of my guitars from wraparound to tunomatic bridges I measured the difference at the wraparound posts and it appears to be .5 inches larger that the standard tunomatic post length and exactly the same length as the stoptail posts Are there any aftermarket tunomatic bridges that are the same width at the studs as the stoptail studs? I know Ill have to drill and mount a 2nd set of holes for the new stoptail Are there any tutotials on this? What are my options? Im trying to avoid doing a retop and hoping for some color touchup instead Thanks !

It's a common finish on many 'holy grail' guitars (although many old Martins have Shellac finishes, I believe), and mojo, marketing and sloppy thinking has lead to many people claiming it has qausi-mystic properties. I'm firmly in the 'properly applied thin film finish is all that matters' camp. Hi Mattia, Thanks for the info. It saved, me time money and trouble from getting sucked into another goofy marketing scam John

Hi John. First question I have to ask is - why??? If you just want to get gloss finish you could do it, but regardless of which type of catalyzed poly Washburn used, the only way to get nitro to stick is to spray a couple of coats of spirit based shellac. This will stick to anything, and nitro will bite into the shellac. I'm not sure, however, that the nitro solvents won't have an effect on the base finish. The other thing is that the new gloss coats won't be as if the entire finish were nitro clear. The base finish's satin is made possible by a flattening agent, which any sprayable coating can contain. Once that's gone down onto the wood, any clearcoats over the top will still appear somewhat 'cloudy'. If it were of utmost importance to have a nitro finish, it'd be better to RE-finish in nitro; ie: strip to bare wood and spray all over. Hi Jack Well my reason is that Im reading about how nitro finished guitars improve in tone when as the get older. I figured since I got the box for cheap I could just refnish it in nitro for cheap too. Is there much of a difference between an satin finished guitar and a nitro finished? Other than this tone aging improving stuff Im reading about? When you say strip down to the bare wood would i have to sand off the brown finish as well? or would I take off enough to get the satin off? Thanks for your info! John Hi Ben I've been reading about how nitro finished guitars sound better as they age and figured I try to nitro the Washburn for cheap. Do you know anything about this nitro aging/tone improving stuff? John

Hi to all on the board I just bought a Washburn WD18SW solid wood mahogany acoustic in a satin finsh. I want to apply a spray on Nitrocellulose finish Can I just put the nitro over the satin finish? Or will I need to do something else? I checked the tutorials and did a search but did not turn anything up for satin to Nitrocellulose finish Any help is appreciated! John