Jump to content

JoJo T. Magnifficent

Members
  • Posts

    95
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by JoJo T. Magnifficent

  1. I don't remember where, but just recently I read that Squier was the name of the guy whose company supplied Fender with strings in the early days. Later, CBS-owned Fender bought the Squier company and retired the name until reintroducing it with the Squier guitar line.

    So no, Fender didn't misspell it. And neither did Billy Squier.  :D

    Well I never knew that... Guess you learn something new every day B) , I also learnd today that Burger King cups disolve in alcahol.. So i actually learned 2 things today :D .

    .... makes me wonder what was goin on in all those lectures i attended today aswell :D .

  2. ive mostly been using earnie balls, but im thinkin bout changing, caue they dont seem to react well to GHS fast fret, mind you i only put it on once a week or so, but they tend to build up a layer of dirt and skin etc.

    On a slight tangent, does anyone know some good steel wound eletric strings? cause ive developed a slight allergy to nickle that can flare up sometimes :D

    PM me is probly best, as to no hijack the thread. Cheers.

  3. Ok, you would no better. Like I said I wasn't sure if they'd be all the same. But, it's good to know that they are wound differently, that is cool. So now the neck sounds thinner and the bridge is fatter? just curious

    To be honest, i didnt notice any difference in the neck position, but then again, i barely ever used to play the neck pickup.

    The bridge used to sound thin and generally pretty bad, so to remedy this i used to turn the tone down and used the bridge/mid pos. while this still didnt sound great, the lack of highs made it sound a bit fatter, and i didint have to put up with as much noise (i live out in the country, so eletric fences etc. have a big impact). However, since changing them, i found the bridge to be much better sounding cause of the increased bottom end, even with the tone up and the bridge only selected. So now im willing to put up with the annoying interference and 50's cycle hum (casue its 50Hz AC power here, not 60) simply casue it sounds so much better now. unfortunately its still a bit thin at the really higher frequencies like during solos.

    considering its difficulty (or lack of) , i think it is an amazing mod for the squier, it gave me enough extra out of it to keep me tolerant for another 6th months (Scheter C-1 Classic comin soon :D:D )

  4. I think most of us have been generalizing our comments about humbuckers. Single coils are usually not very hot, and therefore the winding difference between a neck and bridge single coil is very little. I'm also willing to bet that for production costs, the singles on a squier or similarly price guitar uses the same exact pickup in all 3 positions. I wouldn't expect to much of a change when switching positions.

    Except of course for the fact that the middle pickup is reverse wound usually.

    Yea, the thought that the pickups might all be the same crossed my mind aswell, but i tried it when i was bored one day to see if it made a difference, and found the bridge had a much deeper sound to it afterwards, so it doesnt sound anywere near as thin or brittle as it used to. It could just be my imagination, but it took all of 30 seconds to do while i was changing the strings, no soldiering or re wiring involved, and it sounds better to me so who cares :D .

  5. mmmmmmmmmmmm bacon.bacon.bacon.bacon.bacon.bacon.bacon.bacon.

    bacon.bacon.bacon.bacon.bacon.bacon.bacon.bacon.bacon.bacon.bacon.

    bacon.bacon.bacon.bacon.bacon.bacon.bacon.bacon.bacon.bacon.bacon.

    and saussages, eggs, fried bread (the substitute for pankakes). all mixed together as a sandwich with BBQ sause. I call this " The Artery Buster " :D:DB)

    Now I'm tempted to go and cook one up, but its 20 mins till tomorrow and that might annoy everyone. Oh well, ill just go to bed and dream bout one then.....served on Elisha Cuthbert :D

  6. but this doesn't work so well with 22-fret necks.  they don't have an extended fretboard, so there is no room to glue another block onto the heel.  so if you carve down the front of the neck heel, you're making the area of contact with the body much smaller.  that will make the overall joint weaker and kill some of your sustain.

    I think with a 22 fret neck it would be easier to do what ESP and Jackson do with thier neck joints and just angle ( changing vertical thickness, not width )them to make them smaller on the playing side.
  7. what do you think of the duncan live wire classic?

    I quite like the sound of them, but thats only going from the Seymour duncan sites sound clips. they are designed for those classic rock tones aswell, so they should fit you good. Plus I think that seymour duncan only use a preamp, and not all the EQing and stuff EMG use, so they should retain alot more of the guitars tone aswell

  8. See, I knew I should have been paying attention in Physics, instead of hitting on those girls in the back row.  :D

    No, hitting on the girls was much more worth your while :D , the further into physics you go, the more they tell you that everything youve been taught so far is wrong. (atleast, thats how we do it here in New Zealand).
  9. EMG's are certianly good pickups, but i do agree to a certain extent, theyll sound the same in most guitars. the wood will have a small effect on tone, but because of the design of the pickups (they have weak low-impeadance coils, which is the amped up and put through an EQ etc.) it wont have as pronounced affect as it would with a passive. If your looking for that heavy metalica beefyness however, you cant look past a set of active EMG's.

    If I were you (which im not) I'd still keep passives in mind though, becasue those acrylic B.C Riches have a pretty unique clean sound i think. something like a SD JB in the bridge and a 59 or jazz in the neck could work out quite well (and be alot more versitile than the EMG's). Those are my thoughts, hope you find them usefull.

  10. i dunno bout rimu as a fret board, u can try it if you like. lemme know if it works. Ive been thinkin bout makin a body out of rimu.

    Im new to the whole wood thing, but from the breef inspection of my diningroom table (which is rimu) I think it would be half way between mahogany and maple (just speculation). I gave it a tap, and it had a very bright and focused ring to it.

    Good luck with the bass, and if you do use rimu, lemme know how it sounds :D

×
×
  • Create New...