Jump to content

Saber

Established Member
  • Posts

    702
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Saber

  1. The problem now is I can't seem to figure out how to get the tracks I've recorded to play while I add another track. What am I doing wrong? It can't possibly be designed to work that way, can it?

    Any help at all is more than I've had so far.

    Thanks.

    Click on "Tools", "Audio Options". Go to the "Advanced" tab and put a check mark on "Enable Simultaneous Record/Playback".

  2. I also think it's better to let it hang loosely. That way, once you're used to it, your hand always knows exactly where to reach down and get it without even looking. The problem with tightening it is that one day you'll reach for it and it will be slightly out of position from where you thought you left it, and you'll fumble with it or miss it altogether and that whammy moment will be ruined. When you let it hang loosely, it can never be out of position because it always end up exactly the same place, unless you're playing in the spacelab.

  3. I used the two old volume pots for the pre-existing pups, and one of the old tone pots for the new pup.  I would imagine that the volume pots were 250k and the tone pot was 500k, and that is why I had the issues.  when I turned the new pup pup pot down just a little, it shut the pup off entirely, and the original two pups got much louder.  I just ordered 3 250k pots for the volumes and one 500k for the tone, and will hook it up with those when they come.  That should solve the problem, if not.....?

    Chris

    If your new middle pickup is a lot lower in resistance/impedance than the other two, it can load the other pickups and reduce their signal output when they're all in parallel. That's another thing to consider. Do you know the coil resistance of each of the three pickups from either their specs or from measuring them with an ohmmeter?

  4. to match impedances would it not be really easy to just make a small box with a mosfet buffer in it?

    i realise its one more thing to carry around and means more cables but it would be a very easy fix to make and would mean it would be possible to run just about any gear between the preamp and the guitar.

    It's definitely a possible solution for the impedance issue. The only thing left would be to make sure that the line-level device can work with the lower signal strength of the guitar signal, which is usually possible when the unit has an input level adjustment. But from what I got in previous posts, Drak is not into building electronics devices. And in his own words, "I'd much rather get the right effect off the bat and not have to buy another effect to make the first effect work correctly, if you follow. Just means more knobs, more weight, more rack space taken, and I'm trying to keep it compact and simple." But a simple solution might be to get one of these. It could be tucked away in the rack case behind the other effects.

    While I was on the axess electronics website, I saw something else that might interest you, Drak. Instead of a footswitch for your Rivera amp, you could use this. It could be controlled by whatever MIDI pedalboard you use. You might find their stuff a bit pricey though.

  5. So the Furman PQ3 has the correct inputs for guitar?

    That's  the one I see most often used by guitarists, so I just assumed it was correct inputs.

    The PQ3 has both line level and instrument input. The instrument input does have a higher input impedance than line level devices but at 100k it is still a bit low for a guitar so you would get some "tone sucking" or loss of highs. It would be good in an effects loop, but not too great if you want to plug a guitar directly into it. Dimebag Darrel uses one but his wireless system buffers the signal before the PQ3.

    The G-major is a great unit but for the effects loop because it's a line level device, but if what you're looking for is EQ and Compression between guitar and pre-amp, you can't plug your guitar directly into it like with the much more expensive G-Force.

  6. BTW, I thought I remember reading that the DPX200 had two inputs, one for a mic preamp, the other for standard (high impedance?) line in.

    Was I wrong?

    470k ohm is typical for a guitar input and higher is even better. According to the Ashly DPX 200 specs, it has a >/= 1k ohm mic input (exactly how much is >/= 1k ohm is not too precise but a balanced lo-Z mic input is too low for a guitar) and it has a line input that's 20k ohm balanced, 10k ohm unbalanced.

    On another note, if you're also thinking of noise reduction, ISP Technologies has recently released the Decimator ProRackG. And Channel 1 could possibly double as an impedance buffer between guitar and DPX 200, but you would have to test that out to be 100% sure of optimum signal level compatibility since the DPX 200 is not specifically designed for a guitar signal.

  7. I am pretty sure (unless someone can put a thorn in my decision) that I'm going to buy an Ashly DPX 200, which is a parametric EQ / Compressor/Limiter all in one.

    The only other parametric EQ I ever see listed is the Furman PQ3.

    I do a lot of country style material, and compressors/limiters are great for country music, so I thought that the Ashly was a good choice for my overall rig. STUDIO speaking.

    The DPX 200 doesn't have a high impedance input for guitar so if you want to use it between your guitar and pre-amp (which is where one usually places a compressor), then you would need some kind of buffer between it and your guitar. Remember my earlier suggestion of the Rocktron Xpression? It has the parametric EQ, compressor, and high impedance input for guitar. I don't know about the quality of these features, but they are all in one single unit... and more.

  8. SABER... oh my gosh... Your playing... So full of emotion, so beautiful. And you've got fingers of steel. They can zip. I wish I could play like you, man, you rock.
    Thanks. There's a real emotional vibe to Lee's song even without the guitar solos. My lead melodies sort of wrote themselves, bringing the best out of me.

    Okay, I think we need some more submissions! I'm sorta working on a bass solo for the first half, but it just really needs a guitar for the second half...
    Go for it, man! I can't wait to hear what you come up with.
  9. Maybe you should look into the Rocktron Xpression. It's a MIDI effects unit that has a MIDI programmable 4-band parametric EQ, and other goodies, and it's around $300. And since it has a high input impedance (470K), you can place it either between your guitar and pre-amp for pre-distortion EQ (and phaser and other pre dist effects), or in the effects loop. I don't know of any other MIDI programmable rackmount EQ that has a high input impedance. The Hi-Z ones are not programmable and the programmable ones are lower impedance line-level units. Maybe there are others but I'm not aware of any. It might be possible with the G-Force but at a much higher price.

    I don't know how good the Xpression is noise-wise for use at the front end, though. You'd have to try one.

  10. Sounds good already but here are a few suggestions that you might (or might not) want to try.

    Like MATT said, the kick drum sounds a bit "muted". Maybe add a bit of upper mids or highs to emphasize the percussive "click" sound. And I would try to add a bit of reverb to the snare and toms but not to the rest of the kit.

    Lead guitar might sound great scooped when played alone, but with the drums taking up the lows and highs I would give the lead guitar a bit more mids, especially the ones at around 3:13. MATT commented about the guitar not being loud enough. Maybe it just needs a bit more mids and a bit less lows and highs to make the whole mix more harmonically balanced. The rhythm guitar sounded fine to me though.

    I'm not saying that this is the right way to do it. It's just what I would try, considering what I heard. Just my 2 cents.

  11. If you're referring to the clockwise lug as the left lug, then you're correct for both pots. But it doesn't make sense that connecting the middle lug to ground kills the sound, and it's not immediately obvious why.

    And the arrow with the V+ at the top simply connects to the other arrow with the V+ at the bottom if you want the LED to light when the effect is turned on.

  12. Yeah, Roy Buchanan was real talented but it's still a much more efficient way of getting pinch harmonics from a bridge pickup in the area where most of the string's harmonics are the strongest, and with a high gain amp or pedals to naturally compress the signal to boost the low-level harmonics.

×
×
  • Create New...