Jump to content

DFW

Members
  • Posts

    90
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by DFW

  1. Alright, so the first week of the Build session is over and here's the progress so far. I've got a full scale plan, template, body blank and tapered fingerboard for my electric. For the acoustic, it's an OM, and I have the back, sides, top and tapered fingerboard. The electric is as such:

    5 String Singlecut Bass tuned CGDGC

    35" scale

    Bolt on maple and ebony neck with grain-centric inlay and 24 frets

    Swamp Ash Body with black pore filler, likely a walnut top (we have yet to see our selection)

    Hipshot tuners and a Kahler 7415 Tremolo

    Bartolini MM52CBJD3 with volume, tone and mid control

    ebony finger ramp

    And the acoustic so far:

    Bolivian Rosewood Back and sides

    Mahogany neck, ebony board with grain-centric inlay

    Spruce top

  2. Alright, so in preparation for this instrument I'm building a 5 string normal necked version ie: flatter radius, with frets and only 24 of them to fit the requirements of my student guitar. Contrary to erikbojerik I will be Kahlering this, as after seeing what Vic Wooten can do I have no choice but to have at it. It'll also be tuned CGDGC, or fifths (I call them 3rds) between the low three strings and fourths (coincidentally I call them fourths as well) between the high 3 strings, guages 130, 90, 65, 45, 30.

    - Mahogany body with quilted maple center veneer and walnut wing veneer.

    - Mahogany set neck with ebony fingerboard and walnut veneer on the headstock.

    - Single Bartolini with 3 band eq.

    - Black Hipshot ultralites with a slingshot on the high C to go up a whole step.

    - Black Kahler 2415.

    Building session starts in 2 weeks if I'm not mistaken, though they're experimenting with a new curriculum and that might change.

  3. You know I have stopped by this topic a couple times. I thought some things you were doing were kinda cool and others a bit desperate(in terms of trying to be original). Really that is probably the way it should be. If I liked all of them they probably wouldn't be very unique.

    I think at times you come across as a bit of a ranting green builder when you make some of your statements. Remember when learning and building from a skill base that past masters spent LIFETIMES developing and now their knowledge makes it way to you. You should try to be a little grateful or at least not insult them. A lot of the time paying homage or trying to better understand the methods of past masters is the motivation in trying to re-create designs. There is nothing wrong with creativity and being unique. Just take it easy and build that skill and knowledge base before you figure the rest of the world is below you.

    I do apologize if I disrespected anyone. Truthfully I was aiming to do the opposite, but lack the grasp of English tight enough to convey myself completely. This is more what I meant:\

    I know that my natural abilities will not lend themselves to my being one of the "Great" Luthiers, and rather than label myself as someone lumbering down their path in a drug induced stupor, I could designate my own path where my blunderings would affect only my work and not the more popular instrument creation practices. But I love to hear y'alls ideas, feel free to throw anything too ridiculous to dedicate your time to into this thread and I'll likely try and implement it at some point on something.

    And No One is below me, but we're all way different and I've got this way of looking at things.

  4. whats the point of being a luthier if you cant do repairs? and if you refuse things as simple as dressings and other fret work, you'll starve;

    i personnally like the design but am confused to why you would go to a school to learn and improve but make something that is all from your head; anything that is wrong with it, you can pass off as custom, whereas youve earned a diploma in b.s.

    didnt want you to think i was raging on you design is all. :D

  5. I'm not using frets more because I prefer the sound of skin and wood over metal. True, it also plays in that I don't want to do the fretjob, but mostly it's the fact that frets ruin the sound of the instrument, in my ears. And I meant no disrespect to other luthiers with my XTREME body designs, I just have no urge to replicate any previous body plans, I'd rather stretch my imagination where I can at this juncture. Once I know more about the other aspects I'll try innovating there.

  6. it seems like too much; can we see some other stuff youve finished to get an idea of why your straying so much from an ordinary 'instrument'?

    i love creating things that are different, but when your at school, you want as much 'practical-practical' experience as possible, before these frankenstein collaberations.

    There are countless "ordinary" instrument builders. I'm confident enough in myself to know that I am never going to be one of them. If I built a standard strat or LP replica I would be ashamed of myself. Plus I'm not original enough to come up with something simple, tasteful and unique. My first guitars, the ones that have to be standardized, will be standardized, save for being unfretted (I respect music too much to ever allow frets into my creations). I'd say the only thing I'm straying with here is lengthening the fingerboard, everything else is just extensive carving, not avant-garde luthierie.

    Plus why do something that's already been done a million times? or 100? or 10? The body of the electric instrument is how you show who you are. I'm a two toned curlycue in natural tones and an aversion to right angles.

×
×
  • Create New...