Jump to content

KeithHowell

Established Member
  • Posts

    525
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by KeithHowell

  1. I couldn't agree more.

    My measurements were just a guide after I saw BLS's rather mixed values (inches and centimetres??? only dress makers use centimetres engineers ALWAYS use millimetres) and didn't want anyone to make a decision on something so confusing!

    No offence BLS I was just somewhat shocked at the mixed units.

    Keith

  2. I built my first guitar when I was thirteen and got hooked. (I'm fourty seven now) It will effect your whole life. It certainly did mine. Guitars lead me to electronics which in turn lead to software which is my career, and I'm still messing with guitars.

    So go for it. Don't expect your first guitar to be perfect, but then there's always the next one. (try explaining that to your wife someday)

    Good luck

    Keith

  3. you could always attach a microwave magnet to the pickup, youll have really powerful pickups, acctully i might try that

    I wouldn't do that, the magnetron magnet would probably realign your pickup magnets and destroy the humbucking in the case of humbuckers and who knows what else in the case of single coils!

    Keith

  4. Glue your sandpaper to a flat board and lay the board down flat and firmly clamped.

    Scribble some lines with a pencil on the surface you want to get flat then proceed to sand on your sanding board. Sand until all the lines disappear. Re scribble and make sure all the pencil marks dissapear simultaneously with a few strokes over your sanding board. Your surface is now flat and you can proceed on the other side of the joint.

    Keith

  5. I've been thinking about making a mould to laminate the top and back, how about this:

    Shape a piece of cheap wood to the top profile of the centre block, the bottom flat. Make sure the thickness is equal to standard board thickness (16 mm for chipboard around here) plus the top profile (ie the bit that sticks out above the sides)

    Fix the block down onto a piece of board and on either side of the block fix another piece of board such that it's top surface is the same height as the 335's sides with respect to your shaped block.

    Take a piece of thin ply and cut it to the exact (plan) shape of the 335's top. Place it over your block and screw the edges down to the board. Following the line of the inside of your curfed lining which is on the sides. I reckon by careful placement of screws you could tweek the profile pretty much to what you want.

    You can now laminate up your veneer on top of the ply using vacuum bag methods etc

    You could also use the surface of the mould as a template for a copy router to shape the centre block for the guitar.

    What comments?

    Keith

  6. I've thought about both methods. I think if you're going to laminate up each layer individually it would probably be better to make a mould out of some cheap wood like pine and glue up the layers on that. It will certainly relieve any interlayer stress which the Koch method would induce.

    The vacuum bag method of laminating lends itself to this.

    Keith

  7. Gibson use a laminated top and back on the es-335 style guitars, Maple/polar/maple according to their specs. As far as I know they make up the back and top on a form so that it is pre-formed, before gluing it to the sides. The sides are assembled as you described, like an acoustic with kerfed linings on the top and bottom edge.

    In Martin Koch's book he describes using the assembled sides and centre block as the mould to clamp the top and back to thereby giving it the arch. Donald Brosnac also describes a similar method.

    I intend to use the Koch/Brosnac method when I get to building my 335, after I get my son's requirements out of the way, Ive drawn the plans and got most of the hardware and wood so hopefully I can start building soon.

    Keith

  8. I asked our structural engineering department what steel would be best. The reply was: Tool steel is way to hard, the best would be spring steel if you need very high tension. It's designed to bend. Tool steel is designed to resist wear but will chip easily. (A bit like diamond, won't wear easily but a sharp blow with a hammer and you've got diamond dust)

    Keith

  9. Mild steel should be fine. The rod is either under compresion or tension depending on the design and needs to be able to bend slightly. So using anything too hard like tool steel is counterproductive. You may want to use a piece of stainless if you're worried about corrosion.

    Keith

  10. It seems the thing with ceramics is that they make up a batch of goo, squeeze it into moulds to get the required shapes and then stick them in very hot ovens which hardens them (sinters I think is the term used). The production is essentially much cheaper than Alnico which needs to be machined into whatever shape you want and is also therefore limited and expensive.

    Keith

  11. Did some research on magnets in general. Ceramic magnets apparently can be magnetised more strongly and hold their magnetisation far better than Alnico and be manufactured in all manner of shapes.

    A stronger field gives a higher output with the same coil in a pickup. The magnet type does not effect the tone but the strength of the field produced does. ie ceramic or alnico with the same field strength will give the same tone all else being equal.

    Keith

×
×
  • Create New...