Jump to content

DC Ross

Established Member
  • Posts

    518
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by DC Ross

  1. aidlook, Not sure what you mean...

    Looking at this pic: http://www.zacharyguitars.com/121206_07.JPG

    The first string is wrapped counterclockwise (or anticlockwise for our friends across the pond), and the 2nd and 3rd are wrapped clockwise. The 6th string is wrapped clockwise, and the 4th and 5th are wrapped counterclockwise.

    BTW, can I just say that that's the butt-ugliest, most uninspired headstock ever?

  2. ...Now looking at someone like David Gilmour...

    I was thinking of Gilmour and his 3 1/2 step bends when I saw that fretboard. They claim that those crazy frets won't affect bends, but how could they not? If you bend past the 'transition point' of the frets between strings, you'd have to hear a noticable bump, or maybe choke the note entirely depending on the difference between the fret positions.

  3. Dont damn steel wool your guitar, its the stupidest thing you can ever do... all these lazy people that dont care for there guitar do it cus its fast.... but it just slowely makes ur frets smaller and ur neck smaller.

    errr... We're not talking about SOS pads here. Some 0000 or 00000 steel wool is wonderful for a myriad of uses, including polishing frets and cleaning a neck and fingerboard.

  4. I went through a 'cheap' guitar phase a couple of years ago, and bought an Oscar Schmidt OE-30 (semi-hollow bolt-on) for $110 and an Agile 2500 (LP copy) for $250, and I was planning on getting an Epi LP as well. I went to check it out (which was selling for $400 - at the very top end of 'cheap'), and I was seriously disappointed. The quality was abysmal. Frets were lifting, inlays were proud of the fingerboard, the jack was loose & output was intermittent, etc... You get the idea. After that experience, I would have paid $600 for the Agile, which has no problems at all whatsoever & is a great-looking and great-playing instrument. Everyone who plays it loves it. It puts the Epi LP to shame. Gibson should be embarrassed.

  5. My thoughts only; Body shape is good, headstock looks okay .I like the pickup and bridge combination a lot, it should sound great BUT the thin veneer on the top allowing the sand through on the forearm contour looks bad. The only finish that I would consider on this would be a very dark burst to cover up what I would consider a fault or alternatively an opaque finish, but I guess you would rather show the neck through construction.

    I know some makers do it this way and in the seventies / eighties there were a few more examples going around but if I wanted the fancy top I would have used a thicker piece of wood or worked out some way of bending the top ala Tom Anderson guitars.

    Rgs K

    I've got to disagree :D

    That's one of the design features that really attracted me to Dingwall: http://www.dingwallguitars.com/images/Afte...ody_front_e.jpg

    Great job!

  6. I really prefer the Kahler behind the nut. Well actually, I prefer nothing but a graphite nut, but given the choices I'd go w/ the Kahler. The only reason I chose one over the other is feel. When you're sliding down the neck to 1st position, anything but a nicely rounded, smooth nut can dig into your hand.

×
×
  • Create New...