Jump to content

Strandberg Guitarworks

Veteran Member
  • Posts

    129
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Strandberg Guitarworks

  1. I got the parts back from the anodizer the other day. Here's how they turned out:

    IMG_3580.jpg

    IMG_3579.jpg

    IMG_3581.jpg

    IMG_3583.jpg

    IMG_3587.jpg

    Here's how the Dual Action works - on the left (the 6-string tremolo) you will note that there are two positions for the bearing and shaft. This allows you to change the behavior of the tremolo from stiff and extreme to smooth and subtle. The 7-string tremolo on the right has only one bearing due to the extra force applied from the string tension.

    IMG_3593.jpg

    IMG_3594.jpg

    IMG_3595.jpg

    IMG_3596.jpg

  2. Looks great, would love to be able to mill custom bridges.

    Why do the groves for the tuners thin out on the middle strings?

    My guess would be for a radiused string height, like a TOM-bridge has..

    @Cactus - you're right. It has a 16" radius. Previous revisions of the trems had "steps" and equally deep grooves, but I think this looks better.

    Note that each string has individual height adjustment as well.

  3. So, here's a completely different kind of build - hopefully to the general interest!

    I have spent the weekend at the mill and lathe constructing a new headless tremolo.

    6 mm aluminium to begin with. I am doing a 6-string and a 7-string in parallel, which is the reason for the two different size pieces.

    IMG_3553.jpg

    Here, I have routed the grooves that the tuners will sit in (on the 7-string)

    IMG_3555.jpg

    The two base plates, almost finished

    IMG_3558.jpg

    Plates completed

    IMG_3559.jpg

    This is what brings it all together

    IMG_3562.jpg

    IMG_3560.jpg

    Almost there...

    IMG_3563.jpg

    And assembled!

    IMG_3564.jpg

    IMG_3566.jpg

    What's interesting with this tremolo is that it is based on needle bearings and has two options for fulcrum points. One give more extreme action and the other is much smoother. More pictures will follow! I am sending them away for engraving of logo and then anodization.

  4. Here's "#5" - another installment in the Ergonomic Guitar System

    Mahogany back, chambered

    Wenge top, book matched w/ white veneer strip

    4 mm radius edge

    Belly carve + arm bevel (Wenge top bent to fit)

    Oil finish

    2 x Lundgren M7 pickups

    2-position selector: Neck/Bridge

    Master volume, master tone

    Strandberg EGS Series 3 fixed bridge and string locks, custom color blue

    3pc through body maple neck with 2 x mahogany and 4 x carbon fiber laminates, double-acting truss rod

    25.75” – 25” scale

    24 medium/high stainless frets

    Rosewood fretboard

    IMG_3351.jpg

    IMG_3363.jpg

    IMG_3360.jpg

    IMG_3344.jpg

  5. So, here is some more progress. There are 18 pictures in total on my site, all of which I will not re-produce here.

    Here is the neck set cut with the router shown above

    IMG_3232.jpg

    And the neck shape (right one is my other build)

    IMG_3238.jpg

    Fretboard shaped and inlaid (and fretted of course)

    IMG_3264.jpg

    Gluing the sides

    IMG_3268.jpg

    I am doing things in the following order:

    1. glue laminates of neck
    2. band-saw away and shape section on underside of neck portion
    3. insert truss-rod (while sides are straight and can be used as guides for router)
    4. shape contours of fretboard (so that it can be used as a router template later)
    5. cut fret slots (while it’s still thin and easily fitted into the slot-cutting jig)
    6. glue fretboard (while it is flat so that it can get optimal clamping pressure)
    7. use router to shape contours of neck (using fretboard as template)
    8. rough shape back of neck
    9. radius fretboard
    10. finish fretboard (add inlays) and fret neck
    11. glue sides (and top)
    12. finish shaping
    13. sand
    14. sand
    15. sand
    16. rout cavities for controls and pickups
    17. sand
    18. sand some more
    19. finish/polish
    20. done

    So, it’s an easy 20-step process.

    Steaming the top prior to bending

    IMG_3270.jpg

    and clamping it into shape

    IMG_3271.jpg

  6. Some more build progress below. There are 18 pictures in total on my site, all of which I will not re-produce here.

    Neck set

    IMG_3231.jpg

    Weight removal (almost 250 grams) in a novel way

    IMG_3237.jpg

    Neck shape (left is Chris Letchford build)

    IMG_3238.jpg

    Gluing sides (finally!)

    IMG_3269.jpg

    I am doing things in the following order:

    1. glue laminates of neck
    2. band-saw away and shape section on underside of neck portion
    3. insert truss-rod (while sides are straight and can be used as guides for router)
    4. shape contours of fretboard (so that it can be used as a router template later)
    5. cut fret slots (while it’s still thin and easily fitted into the slot-cutting jig)
    6. glue fretboard (while it is flat so that it can get optimal clamping pressure)
    7. use router to shape contours of neck (using fretboard as template)
    8. rough shape back of neck
    9. radius fretboard
    10. finish fretboard (add inlays) and fret neck
    11. glue sides (and top)
    12. finish shaping
    13. sand
    14. sand
    15. sand
    16. rout cavities for controls and pickups
    17. sand
    18. sand some more
    19. finish/polish
    20. done

    So, it’s an easy 20-step process.

  7. ..snip..

    I was wondering what problem are you trying to solve with the carbon rod? Are you trying to stiffen the neck or maybe add some resonance with a chamber?

    In my experience and this is strictly opinion I have always felt that really stiff carbon reinforced necks don't resonate like a neck without carbon rods. I like to feel the guitar vibrate in the neck while I am playing. I am not condoning building a neck that flexes but I won't use carbon rods.

    If you are adding the rod to gain a hollow area in the neck and reduce weight then I want to know how this turns out. I have been toying with the idea of chambered necks for a few years and would be interested how that turns out.

    Thanks for sharing. I get so many great ideas from you and Rick it is amazing.

    The primary goal for the carbon is to stiffen the neck in a way that it allows me to remove weight inside it. In this particular instance, the weight of the conventional truss rod was so high that the air introduced in the neck didn't make a difference, and the geometry of the neck laminates didn't really allow cutting any additional sound channels (i.e. air pockets).

    Secondary goal is that have found that this carbon tube arrangement has resulted in a very uniform tonal response across the neck, completely free from dead spots. This needs more evidence to be proven, but I have high hopes.

    Cheers,

    Ola

  8. I'm thinking that the rod running inside the tube will be similar to it running inside a routed channel, so it shouldn't make a difference with the expansion?

    Chris: it is secured against rotation by the threaded brass sections on each end of the rod sitting in 6 mm grooves just like they normally would. It doesn't show in these pictures, but I squared off the channel with a chisel.

    But... I'm just as nervous as you guys. We'll see how it works out!

  9. Truss-rod experiment... Combining the CF tube that I had on #3, which worked out really well with a conventional double-acting truss rod. For more details, see main site.

    IMG_3210.jpg

    IMG_3213.jpg

    Truss rod adjustment

    IMG_3217.jpg

    And new fingerboard end

    IMG_3222.jpg

    And on a side note, I just got one of these

    IMG_3226.jpg

    I used it last night to cut the angle of the body end of the neck. It works really well.

×
×
  • Create New...