Jump to content

wood is good

Established Member
  • Posts

    225
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by wood is good

  1. My desire for CAD drawn templates isn't about getting exact copies of Strat's, its about being as accurate as possible for things like neck pocket alignment and bridge placement. I'm confident in my woodworking skills, but I would rather have templates made by computers and have everything as exact as possible. It's no secret that with instruments, precision determines quality, so I want to be as precise and accurate as possible, even if it involves buying another template. So, if anyone actually has templates to sell, please let me know.

    Listen. YES WE GET IT, WE KNOW WHAT YOU WANT. The point is that isnt going to help you much, and its more up to your own work to get everything aligned perfectly anyway.

  2. :D

    If it's a set neck....

    ...and you don't even have the wood for the body yet, much less the neck pocket routed...

    I don't get it. Why are you spazing out about it being too small and not fitting?

    Its not about not fitting, I think its about it being a thinner neck than he wants, like the nut and heel width.

  3. I'll try to answer all your questions. This is probably stuff I should have said from the begginning, but better late than never!

    Before getting started on these guitars, I hunted around libraries and universities and read heaps of books on guitar-making. They were quite helpful but I couldn't find exactly what I was looking for on fret spacing, so I figured it out for myself

    It occured to me that the Nut to 1st fret distance must be a certain percentage of the scale. And each fret distance after would follow the same pattern

    So I sat down with a calculator and through trial-and-error found a number that after doing 12 calculations you get half the original distance

    The number is 5.61257%

    But later-on I finally found a book that gave me the magic number - 1.05946309436

    I couldn't understand why my number wasn't right but after a few calculations I realised its kind-of the inverse of 1.05946309436

    My number gives you the nut-to-fret or fret-to-fret distance and the other gives you the fret-to-bridge distance

    The number I had is actually like the 1/18th rule

    After obtaining that information I tried to apply the formula to the guitars I owned and found that it worked on the Strat but not on the SG

    I measured the frets with a steel rule and a magnifying glass and did it several times to be sure

    I transferred the scales onto a length of Maple and compared them to other guitars and it was usually spot-on

    I couldn't work out the Gibson scale though. I tried numerous ways of applying the usual formula but nothing worked. This was a problem because I wanted to make a guitar two frets longer than normal scale and be sure the intonation was right. I contemplated various methods like Fret Factors and as mentioned, using a tuner. I can't remember which method I ended up using but for eg, the M4 frets closely match the numbers I wrote down (from using a tuner) and it has quite good intonation

    I checked the intonation on my guitars very extensively and found the Strat was good on the 1st string but not the 6th. My Gibson was the other way round. It was good on the 6th string but not on the 1st. So my reason for different scales on the same guitar was for better intonation, Gibson on the 6th string side and Fender on the 1st (not the actual scale but the "formula" behind it) I realised if I worked out both sides on the same scale the frets would spread-out wider on the 6th string side. But I thought it would look weird, be harder to play and it would need more compensation on the bridge. I actually aimed to have no compensation at the bridge on some guitars

    The tuning pegs all close together reduces the amount of string beyond the nut and they don't go out of tune so easily - No need for a locking nut!

    Another concept I had with the "D" guitars. Put the double fret-dots at "E" not the 12th fret. So you have them at the second and fourteenth. But it gets confusing if you're playing open-octave stuff (If you know what I mean)

    I designed these guitars to tune down to D and maintain the same string tension, no problem there. What I don't like about them is the wider fret spacings are a bit of a stretch, they seem a bit heavy and I can't get a nice close action. Having good access to higher frets on a baritone makes a VERY long neck. And after all this I discovered I don't really like playing in drop-tunings

    However - I like the idea of combining bass guitar with guitar. Where you wouldn't be playing open chords etc

    One thing I tried is, instead of tuning at the 5th fret, tune at the 7th fret (like a violin) This is the same as tuning your E down to D but doing it on all strings. It tunes almost down to a bass guitar and as high as a normal guitar. The only trouble is you would have to completely change your playing style and there are things that are just impossible (like 6-string chords)

    Well I better go and by the way I really am from another planet (shsh, don't tell anyone) lol

    But I think its concepts like mine that break ground and after-all I don't see how I'm weirder than other people. The Novak guitars with the fanned frets look exactly like what I had in mind for my next guitar. And TrueTemperement.com - Now thats what I call "from another planet" I remember seeing Hamers (or Hoffners?) having a wiggle in the frets on the B or G string many years ago. I really don't see the point of wiggly frets when you can just use a compensated nut...?

    On one or two of my guitars the angle on the frets is so subtle I even have to ask "why bother?" You can get good intonation with a bit of fretwork. But thats the thing, if I get this right you won't need to!

    Oh thats right - I gotta go, Its nearly 3am again

    Instead, You could have just used this for the regular scales.

    http://www.stewmac.com/FretCalculator

  4. You can also hang the used rags on a fence or a clothes line or something. The idea is to have them as open as possible. As the soaked in oil dries through oxidization it creates heat. A ball or pile of rags does not allow the heat to dissipate. Hanging them open will allow maximum surface area to disipate heat. Once dry, just through them out.

    I dont know how much different linseed oil is from tru oil, but puttting them out in the sun is what has caused my rags of linseed to explode.

×
×
  • Create New...