Jump to content

B. Aaron

Established Member
  • Content Count

    107
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About B. Aaron

  • Rank
    Established Member

Profile Information

  • Location
    Saskatoon, SK
  1. I concur. This was a horrible month for voters - absolutely unfair. I'd vote for almost all of them. It was like asking, "Would you like ice cream and fudge sauce, or fudge sauce and ice cream?" "I don't know; which one is better?" "Both of them."
  2. Much agreed with many of the above comments. C is lovely, balanced, etc., but the headstock is not. The headstock is rather baroque. I'd rethink it and design something that complements the body.
  3. DONE. The finishing process took me a long time because I've had a lot of other things on the go in the same period (other instruments, pedals, gigs, work, schoolwork, sewing, etc). But it's done done done! Check out the photos. As always, I apologize for using a Facebook photo album instead of something classier (like Flickr). 162 photos in total, each captioned with explanations. I can't claim to be an expert, but I can at least pretend to sound professional. https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.10150352534395531.597325.559500530&type=1&l=9161c52828 - B.Aaron -
  4. As is http://www.hobbithouseinc.com/personal/woodpics/ for photos of wood species.
  5. "Don't confuse folk nomenclature with marketing jargon." I try not to confuse either one with science.
  6. xadioriderx: I would rather you post a link to this thread than repost the files, as I am not a member at the other forums and thus would be unable to answer questions that may arise. There is no actual copyright issue at stake - I just could not provide clarification on any confusion that may arise from the files. dpm99: You are not alone in not having researched this topic. I would reckon that not many guitar builders have studied wood outside the context of "what does my book/the internet say this wood sounds like?" because most builders and players that I talk to will say things lik
  7. More photos. - Back is glued on - Binding is finished - Fingerboard is fretted and attached - Neck is mostly carved Just need to finish the fine carving on the neck, then I can sand and French-polish the thing. It's getting there...
  8. I love it. It certainly does have an advantage over the smaller models (which I have also used): it is bigger. It gives you more work space, and that's important. It can do some sort of vertical clamping trick too, but I've never bothered to try that. My only complaint is that I wish it were taller.
  9. New photos up. Inlaid fingerboard. Glued the fingerboard shim in place and shaved it down. Installed the pickup (K&K mandolin twin internal soundboard transducer). Made and glued label on back. I'll glue the back tomorrow and start the binding this coming week.
  10. More new photos: Started work on the fingerboard. Nothing too fancy there, really.
  11. New photos up: - Sealing the instrument interior to reduce humidity-driven movement - Gluing the soundboard in place - Lots of spool clamps
  12. Yeah, bending thick sides sucks. That's why sides were made thin for hundreds of years leading to the traditions we have today, and that's also why anyone who makes thick sides laminates them from several pieces of wood. For example, Friederich uses two 2mm layers of EIR laminated together to produce simple double-thickness sides. Coupling: Oops, I forgot about sound posts in the bowed instrument family. The front-to-back coupling is rather different there, isn't it? They don't really need to rely on the resonance of the air cavity... But again, the instrument relies on the soundpost f
  13. Ripthorn: monopole is the same as the 0,0 vibration mode, yes. Daniel Friederich uses thicker sides than usual (4-5mm) literally all the time. So does the Ramirez 1a, the absolute standard by which concert classicals are judged, and having played a few of them I can tell you that they are very powerful instruments. Many Australian lattice-style classical builders also use big beefy sides - in fact, some are so heavily reinforced that they are barely recognisable as guitars from their interiors: http://www.schrammguitars.com/lattice.html . Gregory Byers uses 6mm thick laminated oak kerfin
  14. I've never seen mahogany used, though that doesn't mean it hasn't been done. The thinnest spots on a violin's top are still a little thicker than the sides on an acoustic guitar, so I don't think mahogany would necessarily be structurally inadequate... however, its stiffness-to-weight ratio is lousy compared to the spruces and maples used for building violins, which makes it a less efficient wood to use for any part of the violin. I recently posted links to some .pdf files I made regarding wood stiffness/strength/hardness/weight in the Acoustic subforum. The data in those files would be a
×
×
  • Create New...