Sorry if I don't consider the differences things like the sitting position of a strat vs. a vee "minute" or inconsequential. And, if we're limiting ourselves to the strat, the vee and the tele then there isn't much to discuss. But since this WAS a thread about ergonomics I was expecting it go just a bit beyond what everyone already knows. Besides, this is a forum for and about guitar building. I would think we could be a bit more expansive in our thinking.
And yes there are inherent problems in the "nature of the instrument" but elements of that can be refined and rethought without the guitar losing its nature. That's what ergonomics is about. Look up the definition of ergonomics and it talks about designing to fit the way the human body works. If we stop at what we know then nothing changes and nothing improves. And while this may have not been your intent, someone reading your comment might think that the guitar has no impact on the musculoskeletal system. In fact, this is the system that succumbs to issues of Repetitive Strain Injury, muscular pain and stiffness, and tendinitis. Guitarists have suffered and continue to suffer from all of these. The idea behind designing with ergonomics in mind is to eliminate potential factors where possible and mitigate those that can't be completely eradicated.
Finally, I wish to apologize to Drak if I misunderstood his comments.
BTW - there was no outrage behind my earlier statement.
Regards,
Robert