vaxination Posted November 6, 2005 Report Share Posted November 6, 2005 i tried searching around the board for this, but i couldn't find anything to quite give me the info that i needed. maybe i used the wrong key words. anyway... so i am building my first neck and i routed my hotrod neck channel. i stopped the route just prior to the headstock angle (approx before the nut) anticipating that i will need to drill the adjustment access into the headstock. however, while doing my searches i saw pictures where builders are routing clear past the nut into the headstock. on the surface, i looks like that would work fine. the only thing is there would not be any wood between the nut and the truss rod. it seems easier than drilling the access into the headstock. so... what are the pros and cons of routing a channel in this fashion? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erikbojerik Posted November 6, 2005 Report Share Posted November 6, 2005 I've done it both ways, and I personally like it better to have a bit of wood underneath the center part of the nut. Yeah it is easier to just rout straight through rather than drill an angled hole, but if you have access to a drill press with an adjustable table angle, the drilling is not that hard either. I think it looks cleaner to have just a hole, especially if you won't be covering the access with a truss rod cover (like on Strat necks). But even if you are, then the truss rod cover doesn't have to come all the way down flush with the nut. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vaxination Posted November 7, 2005 Author Report Share Posted November 7, 2005 hey, thanks for your reply. i will be covering the truss access in either situation. hmm... so you prefer drilling. would anyone else like to share their thoughts on this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwedishLuthier Posted November 7, 2005 Report Share Posted November 7, 2005 I rout all the way, but I'm plain lazy... Have seen it done my way, but covered up with a head weneer, but I think the drill-version is neater. Might try that the next time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vaxination Posted November 7, 2005 Author Report Share Posted November 7, 2005 assuming i will be using a truss rod access cover, what are the pro or cons for drilling vs full route? are their structural issues? is it purely an aesthetic issue? does it only have to do with personal preference? i would like to try an make an informed decision. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frank falbo Posted November 7, 2005 Report Share Posted November 7, 2005 The neck is still structurally sound either way. 1/8" of wood on top of the adjustment nut isn't doing much anyway. On a Hot Rod, I like to pull the brass collar back so it's directly under the nut. I feel it gives you a much smoother adjustment over the first few frets. So in that case drilling isn't really an option, because it extends all the way into the headstock angle. There'd be no wood to leave. On one guitar, however, I used a flamed maple headstock veneer. On that one I just cut out an opening for adjustment, even though the channel was routed all the way through. Then I don't use a truss rod cover. I just cut a nice, sleek oval hole in the overlay. But you can't really simulate that by drilling if you pull the rod back like I do, since there's no wood on top of the rod where the nut slot is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vaxination Posted November 8, 2005 Author Report Share Posted November 8, 2005 i took a look at melvyn hiscock's book and he seems to route thru to the angle headstock too. so i guess it really is personal preference. frank, thanks for the tip about the placement of the brass collar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.