Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Question, should I seal & grain fill the back of a neck (set) that I'm going to paint same as the body & headstock?

I've seen that to improve playability of a painted neck you can/should sand it down (1500 grit) to a mat finish. Also that "perfectly smooth" necks have less slide than one with a slightly uneven surface -- less surface area=less friction (oddly claimed to be proven out in one case by a guy painting/sanding the bottom of a racing boat)

So, if I skip the sealing and pore/grain filling on the back of the neck only - then paint along with the rest of the guitar wouldn't that have the same (or similar) results as sanding back after painting?

Edited by JayT
Posted
21 minutes ago, JayT said:

So, if I skip the sealing and pore/grain filling on the back of the neck only - then paint along with the rest of the guitar wouldn't that have the same (or similar) results as sanding back after painting?

I guess not. Sanding to a satin finish with 1000 grit wet'n'dry sandpaper will give you myriads of microscopic grooves while painting natural wood will end up with tiny shiny valleys. What could I compare them to? Quicksand to ball pool? That's about how big the difference is.

  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...