Jump to content

1guitarslinger

Established Member
  • Posts

    131
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 1guitarslinger

  1. This may be stating the obvious, but make certain you don't have the hot and ground reversed on the output jack.
  2. It's all good. This thread has actually become kind of funny.
  3. "Well, you could have labeled them series, series/parallel, parallel, etc. That would have been much clearer. " We all said, in different ways, 2 pairs of 16 ohm speakers wired in parallel, would give you 8 ohm pairs for the stereo function. And, both of those pairs wired together in parallel would give you 4 ohms for the mono funtion. LK's lower right digram shows the 2 parallel pairs wired in parallel for the 4 ohm mono function. That configuration split in 2 would give the 2 x 8 ohm pairs for the stereo function, The good news is that unless someone has gotten inside the cab and dinked up the wiring, all that will need to be done is to replace the speakers one at a time, wiring them exactly as they were wired to start with. Edit: I overlooked that it may be set to wire the 2 x 8 ohm pairs in series for mono, which would work for the 16 ohm mono function. I doubt they are doing it that way, but you never know.
  4. Not offended at all. Yeah, I think it's an interesting phenomenon of this board. I just wanted to hop on the bandwagon! ;-)
  5. Brother, I get "echoed" all the time here. Seems the SOP of this forum. Thought that wording it a different way might be clearer. Wanted to affirm that that is the only way to wire his cab for those impendences, as Celestion only makes speakers in 8 and 16 ohms.
  6. You would use all 16 ohm speakers, wired in two pairs of parallel. Each pair would be 8 ohms, for use with the stereo function. Both pair selected together in parallel would be 4 ohms, to use with the 4 ohm mono selection.
  7. **waiting for Lovekraft to respond**
  8. No problem. There are many wonderful shops for guitar goodies out there, and you are certainly free to shop from the ones you choose. I am merely letting you know that we are here with some goodies that may be of interest, and to welcome you to drop by the site, and let us know if there's anything we can do for you...should you choose. I suggest contacting the Mods or the forum administrator for clarification of the forum rules. Hope today goes better for you...
  9. No violation of the forum rules here. Well since you asked, we'll do free shipping till the end of October for PG members on orders containing Duncan pickups. That includes special order for pickups we don't have in stock. Thanks to GregP, and ooten2. ;-)
  10. Hot Neck = Hot Rhythm for Tele ←
  11. Paul, do you have a schem and any other info on the 62-903A bass amp?
  12. QP's tone has never been my favorite either. Duncan recommends the Hot Neck that I mentioned in my previous post to go with the Rails bridge. Good luck with it!
  13. Adjusting the pickup heights can help balance the pickups to a point, but can't really overcome a big mis-match. The Duncan Rails is a high output mama jama, so you need something more serious in the neck than a Fender Noiseless which has a more "vintage" output. Something like a Duncan Hot, or Quarter Pounder might be the direction to go. The high output of the Rails would even balance with many humbuckers if you wanted to go that route.
  14. I heard it was somewhat opposite of that. This new map was emailed to me from Canada after the 2004 election. ;-) I'm just sharing this for fun. Don't hate.
  15. No problem. All of them that traditionally have inserts, come with inserts. The only one that does not come with inserts is the ABR1 50's style early TOM, since that style of bridge traditionally had the posts thread directly into the wood. The Nashville style TOM's, the wraparounds, and the tailpieces all come with posts/studs, and inserts/bushings.
  16. Yes they come with studs and threaded inserts (bushings).
  17. Another thing that'll cause blindness? Oh man...
  18. Well how about that. Good job finding the schem! Yes, it looks like it does.
  19. I agree LK, but I am currious after what Paul Marossy brought up. I tried to find a schem really quick to satisfy my curiousity, and hopefully point everyone to it, but no dice.
  20. You may be able to obtain a schematic for that amp through this site: Harmony At this point, testing the tubes is the thing to do before anything else.
  21. I'm not well versed on PRS models, but this should get you started: http://www.prsguitars.com/csc/schematics.html
×
×
  • Create New...