I thought I had posted on this the other day, but I guess not.
Really, I've never been bugged by his guitars. They're ok, not the work of a visionary, but passable none the less. There are people that love them(although how many people that is stands to be seen), so they've got to at least play well and sound good, but the sound part is fairly subjective anyhow.
My only quibbles are his marketing methods and his tuners. That is to say, I don't particularly respect that a lot of what's said on his site is not carried out through his guitars on all occasions(ex: he says that removing wood from a body kills tone, yet he drills holes in a guitar for aesthetics). Also, the look of the tuners doesn't bother me. However, typical tuners are designed such that the string tension keeps the tuner's gear pressed firmly against the worm gear so that it's less likely for the string post to turn. Reversed, this effect is lost and the string post can more easily turn, possibly leading to tuning instability. Although that's something that might not show up until a few years of use, if ever.
So what I guess I'm getting at is that I'm pretty much indifferent at this point and I also have little better to do on a Sunday evening than post here.
On a different note, I sure do wish he'd either put the picture of the cat and mouse back up on the front page or remove my quote, because at the moment it doesn't make much sense.
peace,
russ