the telecaster kid Posted August 5, 2007 Report Posted August 5, 2007 Well, I'm going to be doing a guitar build for woodshop this year, and I want to do something unique. Has anyone seen a body design like this before? What do you think of it? Thanks. Quote
WAK Guitars Posted August 5, 2007 Report Posted August 5, 2007 You should add a picture or sketch so we know what kind of design you mean. Quote
Jonathon Posted August 5, 2007 Report Posted August 5, 2007 You can't see it, evidently. I kinda like it but it's not terribly ergonomic, and I don't really like how the body goes up the neck...but that's just me. Quote
Ben Posted August 5, 2007 Report Posted August 5, 2007 You should add a picture or sketch so we know what kind of design you mean. All photobucket photos disappeared for a bit across the forum- and when I tried to log into my account it told me the site was under maintainence. Same happened in WesV's thread Quote
thegarehanman Posted August 5, 2007 Report Posted August 5, 2007 (edited) Honestly? Based on that drawing alone, I'd say it's going to be neck heavy, difficult to play sitting down, and have frets that are so close together they can't be fretted. But that's based on a crude drawing. Do yourself a favor and draw the guitar out to scale with all of the proper neck dimensions, bridge/nut string spacing, scale length, etc. On that note, I think this body would be a good candidate for a headless setup. That would drop the weight at the headstock and add weight at the back of the body, possibly correcting any neck heaviness that would become evident when playing it on a strap. peace, russ Edited August 5, 2007 by thegarehanman Quote
WAK Guitars Posted August 5, 2007 Report Posted August 5, 2007 I can see the picture now! Cool! Yeah that would look good as a headless. But I agree, you should do a scale version. You might find some things that you want to change. Quote
the telecaster kid Posted August 5, 2007 Author Report Posted August 5, 2007 That's kindof what I was afraid of, because i really don't like headlesses. And yea, the frets would be absurdly close together, which is why, what i didnt specifty, that it's going to be baritone scale, is important. But, yeah, it could be cool as a headless. Quote
Howfar Posted August 6, 2007 Report Posted August 6, 2007 My 2 cents is worth about a half a penny but I'll throw it in.... The sketch is more than a fair start. Starting there I'd elongate the body ever so slightly - a little more egg a little less teardrop. Headless? nah- rather something rounded that mimics the curve of the cutout. Quote
the telecaster kid Posted August 7, 2007 Author Report Posted August 7, 2007 That's what I was thinking. Thanks. I'm going to draw it out full scale tomorow, that should give me an idea of whether it's feasible. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.