Jump to content

Converting An Rga121 To 7 String.


Recommended Posts

RGA121-9.jpg

now to fit a square peg in a round hole :D

http://www.elysian-online.com/RGA121/RGA121-10.jpg

routed out to fit, though i'm gonna wind up shimming the top side of the route a little bit. used my straight edge to properly align it to centerline.

http://www.elysian-online.com/RGA121/RGA121-11.jpg

sorry for the blurry fit, my camera's auto focus sucks. the donor neck has countersunk inserts in it, instead of screws, so it uses hex bolts, though i need to get 1 more(i lost one a LONG time ago), and i need to get some black washers to fit.

today i'll route out the pickups, and in a week i'll make my decision on bridges. it'll either be an edge pro 7, lo pro edge 7, or tonepros tune-o-matic 7 bridge, just depends on what i can find first. i'll likely go the tonepros route though, as lo pro edge 7's aren't super easy to come by, and i don't want to pay 300 from ibanezrules.

the pickups will be a d-sonic 7 for the bridge, and a new7 from an RG7620 for the neck.

Edited by ElysianGuitars
Link to comment
Share on other sites

RGA121.jpg

just routed the bridge pickup... wanted to leave the island that the stock pickup routes had, so i just routed the outer edge of my template. you can see 2 things in this pic besides that, 1 being that this finish is SUPER thin! i'm not sure why so thin, but its the thinnest Ibanez finish i've come across... just a few swipes with 220 grit can take it right off. the other is that i'm gluing my template right to the finish, gotta love titebond.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thin finishes mean less process time in the factory making mass production instruments. Way back when I used to work in a plastics company, we decided to scale down the finish of the Polaroid compacts to two passes rather than the three previously used. Purely an economical decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thin finishes mean less process time in the factory making mass production instruments. Way back when I used to work in a plastics company, we decided to scale down the finish of the Polaroid compacts to two passes rather than the three previously used. Purely an economical decision.

thats what i figured. its also not a glossy finish, it was a satin finish, which i think makes it even cheaper for them to finish, no buffing or anything. any tips on where to get thin veneers? :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ebay? Veneer is cheap as anything to buy. You could spend more and buy a nicer, thicker piece of maple perhaps, and do a 1/4" drop top and refinish the headstock whilst you're at it! :-D

its got a 1/2" maple cap already, its a carved top RGA, and i'd rather not spend all the time to plane the cap off and give it a new one when i'm turning this around to sell for profit...

just got the pups in the mail!

RGA121-14.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

heres a new progress pic, i carved the lower horn a bit. i also sanded off all the rest of the finish, it is now a nude guitar

RGA121-15.jpg

next step is to make a template and route the bridge route out to a much easier to fill rectangle. i've decided this is going to use my RG7421 bridge, with a graphtech acoustiphonic 7 string setup.

Edited by ElysianGuitars
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is an awesome project man! I've always wanted to do this to a guitar, like a cheaper rg though.. All your progress pics look very clean and professional! look forward to seeing more..

Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is an awesome project man! I've always wanted to do this to a guitar, like a cheaper rg though.. All your progress pics look very clean and professional! look forward to seeing more..

Mike

with how cheap RG7's are nowadays, its more interesting to do it to models that aren't available as 7's, imo. especially this RGA, mahogany body and 1/2" maple cap, some real quality woods in it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ebay? Veneer is cheap as anything to buy. You could spend more and buy a nicer, thicker piece of maple perhaps, and do a 1/4" drop top and refinish the headstock whilst you're at it! :-D

its got a 1/2" maple cap already, its a carved top RGA, and i'd rather not spend all the time to plane the cap off and give it a new one when i'm turning this around to sell for profit...

Ah, didn't realise it had a maple cap and I did't see it was carved....why have Ibanez popped on a non-figured 1/2" maple cap when you can't see the maple through the original finish? That beggars belief. I can't see Ibanez doing it for the purposes of tone.... :-\

I'd love to pick up an Ibanez S body and do exactly what you're doing here, except i'd probably end up making it an eight because i'm silly like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ebay? Veneer is cheap as anything to buy. You could spend more and buy a nicer, thicker piece of maple perhaps, and do a 1/4" drop top and refinish the headstock whilst you're at it! :-D

its got a 1/2" maple cap already, its a carved top RGA, and i'd rather not spend all the time to plane the cap off and give it a new one when i'm turning this around to sell for profit...

Ah, didn't realise it had a maple cap and I did't see it was carved....why have Ibanez popped on a non-figured 1/2" maple cap when you can't see the maple through the original finish? That beggars belief. I can't see Ibanez doing it for the purposes of tone.... :-\

I'd love to pick up an Ibanez S body and do exactly what you're doing here, except i'd probably end up making it an eight because i'm silly like that.

actually, the finish is semi transparent, with enough light you can see through it easily, especially the mahogany on the back. there is also another version of the RGA121 with a fully trans finish, so you can see the maple and mahogany in all its glory, i figure the darker one i got is just made the same as the trans one because its easier to make all the guitars exactly the same besides finish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Entirely plausible as a factory efficiency decision, true.

Looking back at the linked photos, I see what you mean about the finish. I don't personally think that it warrants the "prestige" tag as the other prestige instruments i've played (and own) are beautiful instruments. As it stood, that instrument was a little....lacklustre in comparison. Even the finish looked dodgy at best! Ah well, such is entropy. I'll sit here and wait for the prestige II line to be released when they pick up the ball again.

That said, the neck looked really nice. I presume you are selling it or saving it for another project? It looks ripe for a good ol' binding job being done on the headstock, fingerboard de-fretted and bound.... :-D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Entirely plausible as a factory efficiency decision, true.

Looking back at the linked photos, I see what you mean about the finish. I don't personally think that it warrants the "prestige" tag as the other prestige instruments i've played (and own) are beautiful instruments. As it stood, that instrument was a little....lacklustre in comparison. Even the finish looked dodgy at best! Ah well, such is entropy. I'll sit here and wait for the prestige II line to be released when they pick up the ball again.

That said, the neck looked really nice. I presume you are selling it or saving it for another project? It looks ripe for a good ol' binding job being done on the headstock, fingerboard de-fretted and bound.... :-D

gonna sell it... i measured it with my digital calipers, and its .715" at the first fret! :D thats so frigging thin! its .792" at the 12th, not too bad, but man, its a THIN neck. i think the neck and fretwork alone are good for the prestige logo, its got better fret work than any RG i've ever played on, its pretty great to be honest. and for 800, not a bad price for a "prestige" line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh yes, I forgot about the excellent fretwork on the Prestige instruments....silly me....

Your neck is actually *thicker* than my S1540FM, believe it or not! At the 2nd fret, it's something like 17-18mm (0.67" - 0.70") although I couldn't be more accurate without taking the strings off. I presume it's the same radius as mine. They are super necks to play on though. They make my EXPs feel like baseball bats :-\

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're using a ZR? This is the first time I've ever seen anyone retrofit a ZR7 or even just a ZR! I can tell this will be awesome though.

its gonna be a definite learning process, as i don't really have anything to go on specs wise with the ZR trem. i'm gonna head to guitar center and check out some S's, just to make sure i understand the entire setup before i even touch the body with a router.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do you guys think of the zr trems? Do they alter tone like a floyd or do they have a tone more like traditional trems? this is the only factor that would stop me from using them because I know that the tuning stability is good with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...