Jump to content

Second Build


Recommended Posts

Hello!

i'm new to this forum, after 6 months i've build a LP for my friend.

This is my second build (first was tele). Here are a few pics of finished guitar:

67828983eq9.jpg

http://img116.imageshack.us/img116/1017/35512427dx6.jpg

http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/36/78229084pd5.jpg

http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/6929/94103263lq4.jpg

http://img212.imageshack.us/img212/6236/34433892ta6.jpg

i will put some progress pics later

Edited by Maiden69
One pic per post forum rule
Link to comment
Share on other sites

progress pics:

wood, ash body, maple neck and maple top, rosewood fingerboard

dsc00308sx6.jpg

http://img131.imageshack.us/img131/226/20ff8.jpg

top

http://img47.imageshack.us/img47/999/27vm0.jpg

fingerboard

http://img514.imageshack.us/img514/2449/36qk3.jpg

binding:

http://img104.imageshack.us/img104/5976/42tm7.jpg[

Edited by Maiden69
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, you just committed trademark infringement by putting that Gibson decal on the headstock and supplying the guitar to your friend.

i know, that+s his idea, but on the back of the head i have put my logo and number so everybody who will play this guitar will see that this is not original gibson, but replica

The binding looks pretty shoddy too, and the neck pocket's pretty slack. Though that just reflects early Gibsons anyway....

next will be better, i didn't have tools for binding (now i have router bit)

thanx for comment :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't mean the binding's shoddy, my brain was all over the place. There are some gaps in the inlay, that's what I was thinking. Everything I've pointed at though has cleaned up very well for the finished article.

Seriously though, it's one thing putting a Gibson logo on a guitar just for yourself. But seriously, by giving it to your friend you have now broken the law. If Gibson could get your personal information from this website (which I believe they could via court subpoena and going through IP addresses etc) you could end up in court. If he asks you should be smart enough to say no. Take the guitar back from him, sand off the decal, and put your own makers mark on the front. Be proud of your work for crying out loud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously though, it's one thing putting a Gibson logo on a guitar just for yourself. But seriously, by giving it to your friend you have now broken the law. If Gibson could get your personal information from this website (which I believe they could via court subpoena and going through IP addresses etc) you could end up in court. If he asks you should be smart enough to say no. Take the guitar back from him, sand off the decal, and put your own makers mark on the front. Be proud of your work for crying out loud.

I couldn't agree more. Doesn't matter if it's his idea or not you should remove that decal ASAP. Big companies like Gibson will go after the little guy for something like that to make a point on their trademarks. Don't be a victim of that. The guitar is nice but you really need to remove that decal before something bad happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Supernova9, get that Gibson logo off of there and put your brand on. BE PROUD DUDE. Let that sucker cry "The Truth" to all. Otherwise, it's all just a big lie... Like Super says, Gibson finds out, your toast.

Actually, if you ditch the "Gibson", and did "The Truth" in place of "Les Paul" in the same script on the headstock, it might actually look really cool, in a mystic kind of way. Whoa, dude... gotta roll myself another one of those :D .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, if you ditch the "Gibson", and did "The Truth" in place of "Les Paul" in the same script on the headstock, it might actually look really cool, in a mystic kind of way. Whoa, dude... gotta roll myself another one of those :D .

Dude, that's hilarious... :D

Seriously, "The Truth" would be a great brand name for a guitar!

It looks like your project turned out well. I have no experience in the trademark stuff, but I trust what the other guys say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it's a one-off for a friend rather than trying to make a living selling duplicate guitars as Gibsons I really don't think you have much to fear from the lawyers, they have more pressing matters to attend to. However, the point about putting your own mark on your work and being proud of your skill, that's well worth taking on board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think you can press legal charges unless there was an exchange of asset of some sort (either barter or cash) for the guitar. If it's a gift, any lawyer would be hard-pressed to come up with a case.

That said, I totally and completely agree that you should be proud and put your own logo-- you did a good job, dude!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice job The Truth. I wouldn't be too worried about Gibson's lawyers, they have not caught up with Slash yet. Here are Slash's Les Paul copies.

8a0o7dj.jpg

The one in the middle you can hear on Apatite For Destruction.

I do agree with the boys' suggestion though that on your next guitar it would be good to show your pride with your own logo on the front of the headstock rather than the back.

Nonetheless, your second build looks cool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...