I have been going over this thread for about an hour now trying to make some sence of it (Ya, I know what you're thinking... Get a life!) The thing that I couldn't wrap my head around was this:
At first, I thought this was a bunch of gibberish and contradictions (no offence), but after much pondering, I think I know what you were trying to get across. This is how I interpret that (I'm gonna throw in some random numbers, just cuz that helps me explain it):
Say you have a scale length of 25 inches, and another 3 inches of string from the saddle to the body/ferrules. With a very sharp break angle on the saddle, there is a lot of friction at that point. When you strech the string (by fretting or bending, etc.) you effectively only have 25 inches of string to stretch and absorb the increased tension (ignoring the string behind the nut).
Now, if you reduce the break angle across the saddle, this will obviously lower the friction at that point. For the sake of argument, let's say it's eliminated. This effectively gives you another 3 inches of string to "absorb" the increase in tension from fretting/bending the string. In my mind, this would have the biggest impact on the strings feeling "looser".
So what Rich said about having to bend the string farther to get the same pitch (with less break angle on the saddle) makes sence, because there is more string to stretch.
So thanks Rog, for making me think!! Your explaination, as confusing as it was to me, was probably the best one!
Cam