Jump to content

12 Telecaster Whack Jobs


Drak

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm tryin' to figure out that rear control cavity on Koa Kountry...how do you get such a tight fit?

I would think that the saw blade alone would take off enough material to cause a gap but that one is barely noticeable.

A scroll saw? :D:D

Sweet guitars and fantastic pics as usual. B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the nice words.

Yes, I do use a scroll saw for that.

I don't even own a bandsaw, I use the scrollsaw for everything I need a saw to do, cutting out body blanks, cutting wood, cutting out steer heads, etc. B)

Tough little bugger that thing is.

Actually, almost all dozen Teles have the rear control cover cut out like that, just haven't posted many back pics yet.. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scroll saw!?!? How do you do that? Is it possible on your tele's because of the fact that they're chambered and at some point in the construction, you have no top on it? I'm just trying to picture how you get the saw blade inside the body like that

Yes, I cut the design out before I glue the top on, and also, there's a big ol' round chamber below the steerhead, which is cut out of the body before I glue them together. Actually, 80% of it I do with a router, I just need the scrollsaw for the tips of the horns where it's too thin to get a router bit into.

So the steerhead is really my 'opening' for the chamber below it...dig? The entire area in the upper bout is hollow. :D

Check back up in the pics, I just added the new one in, with closeups of the steerhead cutout. :D

Moooooooooooo............ :DB):D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope, I buy my necks, usually from Warmoth. I have never (and still don't really) felt the urge to build necks, so I don't. I've got wood here for building necks, but I never feel like doing anything with it.

There were 3 different necks in those pics, the yellow one, and two different amber ones.

The 2 amber ones are very similar, you'd have to see them side by side to see the slight color variance.

They're all Warmoth Triple Birds (AAA upgraded Birdseye on Birdseye )

The 2 Amber ones I bought already finished from them (they use Poly), but I really didn't like that amberish color, so then I started buying them unfinished and spraying them myself (w/ nitro lacquer), which the yellow one is. I have another one I sprayed that's also more of an orange-amber on one of my guitars that's finished and playing, so I've bought four Triple Birds from them so far.

Oddly enough, I bought all those necks about 4 years ago, and the 2 amber ones have just been sitting here since I was doing more extreme colored uhhh, 'high octane' guitars that amber just didn't go with, and here, years later, I start doing natural wood Teles and BAM! the amber necks fall right into place like they were supposed to be there the whole time...go figure... :D

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The story is this:

That control layout suits me -very- well, it took me a -long- time and a lot of tries to come up with that scheme, with the pots laid out like they are and the switch where it is, so I'm fine with all the guitars having that setup, it's the most versatile scenario, and open to many various possibilities, and I really dig it.

Pkps have not been decided yet, and that decision can come last, so that's why they are how they are, you're just not looking at a finished guitar yet. Only a few even have the bridge pkp routed as yet, since I know there -are- a few that definitely will have Tele bridges (and most likely Tele neck pkps too)

But many of them will have different neck pkps (P-90's, TV Trons, Mini-HB's, 2-SC's Strat style, etc...) and there will be some different bridge pkps as well, probably P-90's and the like.

So basically, I'm just not done yet, and leaving my options open until the last possible minute.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, my usual 'MO' these days is to use an EMG Afterburner preamp, and once the A-burner is in the picture, that opens up the game for any other EMG tone-shaping pot, like the SPC or EXG to name two, that I might want to throw in also.

So, typically it might look something like this:

Pot 1 (directly under bridge pkp) Volume Pot. The positioning of this pot anchored every other pot, this pot is exactly where I want it, and I made all the other pots fit around it. I placed this pot where my pinkie is comfortable grabbing it for volume swells. One of the reasons I make my own guitars is so they fit me like a glove and the things I like are there and the things I don't like aren't there, and the positioning of that first pot is important to me.

Also the positioning of the 5-way is exactly where I like it too.

Pot 2 (behind that) Tone Pot

Pot 3 (furthest towards back) Afterburner preamp, which is a pull and rotate to activate pot. This doesn't need to be nearby, I've found I'm happy with the A-burner always being near the back end.

Pot 4 (up front on bottom) EMG SPC Control

Pot 5 (near back, bottom) EMG EXG Control

But you could do -anything- with the holes, if I don't use an Afterburner, I can use some of the holes as openings for mini-switches w/ an appropriately sized washer, or even a 2-way Gibson toggler or two, or blender pots, or Piezo Pickup controls for a Tele with a Ghost System Piezo setup, which at least one will have.

But what I listed is my usual preference with some modifications from one guitar to another.

They were built with versatility in mind, I knew I didn't have the control scheme for all of them figured out, and this setup will work for just about anything I can dream up, and I just don't like the typical LP Gibson-looking 4-pot scheme, and if I just used 3 pots in a row, the 5-way switch where it is, looks completely stupid and out of place, but looks -perfect- with the 5 pots, since it's angle is taken from the angle between the first upper and first lower pot.

This is the only scenario where everything seemed to work right and satisy my needs and was repeatable and versatile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see...it's a great MO and better to build it that way than to trust someone latter to hit it with the drill and router. The cavity would be big enough for batteries or what ever you like...it's really appauling how poky some are...the Les paul could loose some weight anyway so why they rout it so close I don't know. Actually, If they just added a master volume to the Les Paul like Fender did with the Starcaster where you have yours, it would be a better guitar for it. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...