Jump to content

New build - The Verdict


Recommended Posts

Back in black. I didn’t like the black ABS binding I first put on the fretboard. Bound it with birch ply and it looked fine. The problem was that the color of the ply was not the same as the color of the neck wood despite them both being birch. I was not expecting them to be exactly same but as it appears the ply has strong cold blueish color while the neck wood is reddish and warm. Didn’t go well together. So I stripped the plywood and decided I don’t hate black ABS as much anymore 😂 Pondered using cream ABS but that would have required binding the body with the same material too, I think. I may do that some other time but this body ain’t going to be bound. Have to stick with at least one decision!

ED58D4A3-5D26-4D7D-A381-58DBD17D49E6.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, henrim said:

Strung it. Looks like everything is reasonably well within tolerances. I’ll define the neck shape with the strings on and then take it apart again to finish up parts individually. 

 

 

Very nice!

 

May I ask why you shape the neck with the strings on? I'd guess it's either to feel the play of the neck while carving, or it's to do with string tension... maybe both?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Akula said:

 

Very nice!

 

May I ask why you shape the neck with the strings on? I'd guess it's either to feel the play of the neck while carving, or it's to do with string tension... maybe both?

Thanks!

Neck was shaped separately to a playable shape. I’m trying fine tune it with the strings on. Also trying to figure  out how the heel should transition into the body. Although since the instrument is for myself I guess that transition is more of an aesthetic choice since I don’t really play the higher frets that much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Decission making is hard sometimes. I’ve been through this binding thing a few times now. After all I decided to use cream binding. I took a length of 2 mm  ABS binding and milled it down to 1 mm. 

Now I’m tempted to bind the top of the body too 😂 I’m thinking it would be nice with ebonized top, cream binding and ash back. But I’ll try to talk myself out of it because I liked so much the original idea of having a birch neck combined with ebonized ash back. And the original body shaping plan would have to be changed too as I’m not sure I could bind the curves I had in my head. But I’ll think about it.

BBCFA7D7-52B6-43F8-8CC7-392322E81E52.jpeg

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, henrim said:

Decission making is hard sometimes. I’ve been through this binding thing a few times now. After all I decided to use cream binding. I took a length of 2 mm  ABS binding and milled it down to 1 mm. 

Now I’m tempted to bind the top of the body too 😂 I’m thinking it would be nice with ebonized top, cream binding and ash back. But I’ll try to talk myself out of it because I liked so much the original idea of having a birch neck combined with ebonized ash back. And the original body shaping plan would have to be changed too as I’m not sure I could bind the curves I had in my head. But I’ll think about it.

BBCFA7D7-52B6-43F8-8CC7-392322E81E52.jpeg

i freq change my mind while a build evolves... and am faced with similar questions... wondering if I am straying farther from my initial vision or moving closer to something better.

I've decided that as a rule I should never go one direction over another based only on perceived difficulty... because often times it is only more difficult in my head.  Not sure if this has served me well or not, other than the fact that I don't end up regretting not having given enough to a build.

 

some struggle with binding... and I certainly struggle with many things that others seem to find to be easy... but binding tight curves has come fairly easy for me... this headstock for instance, was a single piece of binding.  All this is just to say: I believe you can do it.

4_DSCN4632_AA.JPG.50ee0c3a9bf6c3431340be

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks! 

5 hours ago, mistermikev said:

this headstock for instance

That’s impressive work for sure! 
 

5 hours ago, mistermikev said:

All this is just to say: I believe you can do it.

The reason I’m hesitating is twofold. There is a technical side and an esthetic side. In my vision this guitar will have a carved top with concave recesses in the cutaways. I guess I could figure out a way to route (or plane) the binding channel to those areas but then I can’t really see the recesses visually working with binding. If I decide to bind the body then I don’t do the recesses but they were the first thing I had in my mind when I started with this guitar. Today’s thinking is I don’t bind this body but if I ever do a second version that will be bound. 

I consider building as a part of the design process. I deliberately don’t make 3D models of my personal projects beforehand to keep things somewhat open. Obviously I decide some fundamental things before I start building and I draw 2D to figure out sizes and measurements. But otherwise I like to see where it goes. Although I don’t know what there is to like as it makes the process always very slow and frustrating 😅

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, mistermikev said:

interesting take on a hybrid bolt/neck-thru - had not noticed that before.    

On my two single cut guitars I built parallel the other one has set-neck and the other one is bolt-on. Both constructions have their strengths so I wanted to find a middle ground in between. On my research I found some similar solutions that I had been thinking. I believe Travis Bean aluminium neck guitars/basses were the first to use this kind of construction.


image.jpeg.e6fc9bc5d18ddc26a31d7fe1ac090771.jpeg

image source: https://www.offsetguitars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=65434&start=30

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Prostheta said:

It's ambitious! Especially if you don't plan it out beforehand 😄

Yes. I thought I had planned it pretty good but there have been a few places I have had to improvise. And solutions are not what I would have done had caught the issues in the planning phase. Anyhow I consider this build as a "prototype". It's all part of the design process.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My thought processes altered maybe 4-5yrs back when I really delved into manufacturing process design. I couldn't start without a design these days! The Travis Bean idea is certainly one that I've seen before, and being aluminium the design of the neck attachment really suits the material. If you can pull it off in wood, that's a real trick. I think I now have that idea in the back of my head, where I have to design something so that I could make 10x, 100x or 1000x of something as well as I could make 1x. The real satisfaction for me is in designing the method, winding up the clockwork and letting her go 🙂 So autistic.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Prostheta I think I linked this somewhere in this thread or maybe it was in my dulcimer thread but there is at least a Canadian guitar manufacturer called Millimetric who has done similar neck construction with wooden neck.  https://www.millimetric.ca

And all in all I guess I have done this for different reasons. I wanted to make part count less and sandwich all the electric parts between neck and body. I was playing with the idea of having an interchangeable body so that everything would be mounted to the neck. But I gave up with that because I came obsessed with the idea of having the strings go through the neck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The concept of Millimetric's is interesting, however I can't help but see a lot of potential short grain through the area where the neck meets the heel. It seems even less supported than how old 70s SGs were glued in close to the neck pickup. This is one of those situations where principles absolutely must come first, and viewing their gallery it seems they have a deeper heel to fix this weak point, which sort of defeats the objective of creating greater upper fret access. Hmph.

Yours has a much superior strength in that specific point, so I would say that you shouldn't get "too inspired"! Travis Beans are an excellent example, however they don't have the fend with the issues that wood presents.

Hey, have you ever wondered if a guitarist has ever wanted to change the profile of a Travis Bean? "A bit off the profile please!". What a nightmare 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...