Jump to content

curtisa

Forum Manager
  • Posts

    3,730
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    152

Everything posted by curtisa

  1. Cheers Scott. The carve was far easier to achieve than the one I've been doing up till now. Less time fiddling with angles = quicker result = happier camper. It might be anatomically challenged, but I reckon you'll barely be able to tell you have a guitar in your hands. I haven't put anything on the scales yet, but the body feels like it weighs about a kilo.
  2. Nah. That's such a thin coating it will disappear in no time under the ROS. Scraping each of the little fills back flush will take much longer.
  3. The world's smallest headplate? Once the epoxy has dried and is scraped back, all is revealed: Finally make a start of carving and contouring. I'm shooting for a simpler carve on the top than my usual, so I've gone for a basic curve that goes across the face of the whole body, a little like the Ibanez S. Nothing special about the rear contours, except that I can't make the belly cut too deep owing to the chambering immediately behind the carve. Last step for the evening is to start filling the voids and birdseyes in the myrtle with clear epoxy (couldn't resist spreading a little around to highlight the figure). There'll be plenty more of that to come yet as the blackheart sassafras is full of little pin holes all over.
  4. You should be able to get a good solder joint with any iron with a rating of 20W or greater. Try making the point you're trying to solder on the back of the pot closer to the corner where the sides meet the back. There's less mass to heat up there. The trick is to use the iron to heat up the part you're trying to get the solder to adhere to, rather than trying to transfer a big glob of solder from the tip of the iron to the component. Increasing the amount of surface area the tip of the iron is making contact with helps too, as it can transfer more heat more effectively. Angling the iron so that the conical side of the tip rests on the part will improve things, as will adding a tiny dash of solder between the tip and the part as it heats up. Reheating a previously-soldered blob is the same process. You'll know when things are getting hot enough as the solder will start to spread outwards across the surface of the pot case instead of forming little lumps and droplets. Once it's at this point make all your connections as quickly as possible to prevent damaging the internals of the pot.
  5. Only if you know (or suspect) that the copper-ised surfaces on scratchplate and cavities will never contact properly. In your case I reckon you'd be pretty safe - it looks like you have lots of places where there's sufficient overlap. If you're still worried about it, just extend a little flap of copper tape over the edge of one of the cavities so that it reaches one of the scratchplate screw holes. The ones near the tone pot or the 5-way switch would be good spots.
  6. Are we still talking about the UK summer? In all seriousness, that's going to be a fine-looking instrument.
  7. Another option is two blend pots feeding one volume pot each. If you want the ability to do tone control on two pickups at once without cross-feeding the other two pickups you'll have to use dual gang pots.
  8. I have the Triton. Good little unit for the money. Only real issues I have is that the table can't be tilted and there's no integral fence ( can easily be circumvented with the application of a block of wood and a couple of clamps). Buy several grades of grits for it. The 80g spindles it comes with are good for quick stock removal, but you'll want something extra to give you a finer surface finish. Also get a rubber cleaning stick too.
  9. Do you mind if we call you "Andrew," just to avoid any confusion?
  10. Thanks Tim. The cutter was a twin flute 1/8" diameter carbide endmill, feedrate 150mm/min, RPM...whatever the maximum my machine is capable of doing (supposedly 10K, but probably less once it was cutting). Outline was done first to a depth of 2.5mm, ramping into the cut along the left hand side until DOC of 0.5mm was achieved, then running around the circumference in 0.5mm DOC passes.. The ledge was done by zig-zagging around to remove the waste starting from the "open" side, DOC 0.5mm, gradually working outwards towards the edges, with each path overlapping by 1mm. Final depth of the ledge is 1mm below the top surface, so two full runs of 0.5mm DOC to get there. Holes were done with a two flute 1.5mm diameter endmill, helical interpolation at 0.5mm height intervals to a max depth of 1.5mm below the ledge. I only wanted to get the holes started in the CNC and finish them on the drill press. In hindsight I probably could have included a finishing pass to remove some of the chatter marks, but having just sprayed a coat of etch primer on it they're completely invisible now.
  11. Just about ready to start carving and contouring: Doesn't look like much now, but trust me, this will work out in the end: The next real challenge is to deal with the best way of mounting the string locks on the headstock. The biggest issue is that the trussrod access is directly under the D-string lock, which doesn't leave much meat for the screw to hold on to and the screw itself is right over the top of the adjuster nut buried in the neck. Screwing directly to the headstock is obviously out of the question, so it was once more over to the CNC to come up with saome kind of adaptor plate. This was the first time I'd tried milling aluminium (or aluminum, depending on which side of the equator you prefer to reside) and it went surprisingly well. Just went slowly and kept a can of cutting spray nearby (as evidenced by the copious amounts of oily spray all over the spoil board. I don't reckon my guerilla machine shop skills are likely to scare anyone off, but for a first attempt I'm pleased with how it came out: After freeing the plate from the waste, cleaning up the edges and tapping/countersinking the holes this is the result:
  12. I'd experiment with it first before running with it. The key will be how tight you can get the cut plug to fit the drilled-out stud hole.
  13. If you can get your hands on a plug cutter it will probably give you better results, both structurally and visually. The grain direction on the dowel will be lengthways (vertical in the bridge stud), whereas the grain direction of the body surrounding it will be perpendicular to it (horizontal across the face of the bridge stud). Redrilling a new stud into the endgrain of the dowel once it's inserted will be difficult, as the bit will tend to wander more than if it was drilling into cross-grain. End grain is weaker than cross-grain, so the tension of the strings may deform the dowelled section into an oval shape again. The end grain will also take stain very differently, so it may stand out prominently against the rest of the top once finished. If you use a plug cutter you can make your own replacement from a piece of timber that where at least the grain direction matches the original, which will be stronger than plain dowel. You can also experiment with finding a close match to the original grain pattern so that the repair is as invisble as possible.
  14. That's a pretty open-ended question that I reckon would be near-impossible for anyone to answer. There's too many parameters to give you a solid direction. Not necessarily. How much it sustains could be due to all sorts of factors not goverened by the body being chambered. Scale length, string tension and gauge, through-body or top loading bridge, fit of neck to body, how loud your amp is while playing (acoustic feedback)...Again, hard to predict just by presuming that chambered instruments and certain timbers will always have a particular sonic characteristic. Sounds fair. Given that you are leaving the centre section of the body fully solid, the hollow sections are not load-bearing. The only requirement will be making the thickness of the top above the control cavity thin enough to allow the controls to poke through (as you've already pointed out). For strength, 12-15mm side thickness should be quite reasonable. There's a not-unreasonable argument made by many people that the pickups will be biggest factor in how the instrument sounds when plugged in. I suspect you may already know what the answer to this question is
  15. 3mm MDF doesn't leave a lot of "meat" for the router bearing to ride against. 6mm or thicker would be better. With a 3mm template it won't take much for the bearing to slip over the edge and start riding above it, cutting into the template. Maybe the piece the template was attached to was slightly warped and the template was cupped slightly at that point, allowing the bearing to run off the edge? The overall lack of smoothness of the cut can be due to a lot of things - dust and debris getting trapped around/on the bearing, vibration of the workpiece or router as it is worked, eccentricity in the router spindle and collet...I'd personally call the slight waviness in your cuts quite typical and would expect to have to deal with it during final sanding and shaping anyway.
  16. I will readily admit that I am rubbish at freehand sharpening chisels and plane blades. Keeping the blade at a consistent angle to the stone while introducing a steady, alternating honing motion is something I've always struggled to master. Most of the time I either find myself accidentally honing the blade slightly skewed or deviating from the intended 30 degree bevel, resulting in a tool too blunt to scare any self-respecting piece of timber, let alone shave hairs off the back of my arm. So it was somewhat of a relief when I finally admitted defeat and went and bought my first honing guide to help me get my chisel sharpening back on track. For those that aren't familiar, a honing guide is a device fitted with a roller assembly that secures a chisel or plane iron in a set of jaws and allows the user to sharpen the blade on a whetstone, diamond stone or any other flat surface coated with abrasive material to achieve a consistent cutting bevel every time. An accurate and clean bevel on a chisel or plane iron is key to getting the best performance out of those tools. My first honing guide was a simple affair, featuring a clamping mechanism made up of two wide plates with a brass roller underneath. The clamping plate had a series of straight lines etched into the surface to assist with visually aligning the fitted blade so that it sat square in the clamp, and the blade was secured by tightening two thumbscrews at either side. Generally it worked quite OK for the paltry $20 I paid for it at the time, but it wasn't without its drawbacks. The clamping mechanism was made from aluminium which had a tendency to flex when the thumbscrews were tightened, which allowed narrower blades to gradually skew to one side while honing. The clamping mechanism wouldn't hold shorter blades, such as spokeshave irons at the correct angle to the stone. Aligning a blade squarely against the refence marks on the guide was only as good as your eye. And there was no inherent way to accurately set and measure the bevel angle. Enter the MK II Honing Guide made by Canadian outfit Veritas, whose long list of premium-quality tools and accessories have been high on many woodworkers' must-have lists. With a street price of around $68US, this could arguably be described as the Rolls Royce of honing guides. Straight off the shelf the Standard Mk II comes with a solid diecast zinc alloy blade clamping body with a wide brass roller, an angle setting registration jig which is also used to set the squareness of the blade being held and a set of clearly-written instructions. The standard honing guide set can also be upgraded with additional accessories that include a cambered brass roller for honing blades into a gentle curve (useful for wide plane irons) and a set of narrow tool jaws for securely holding chisels as slim as 1/8". The guide will happily accept plane irons as wide as 2 7/8" (73mm), which should easily accommodate the larger Number 7 jointer planes and beyond, and up to 15/32" (12mm) thick. Minimum recommended blade capacity is quoted as 1/2" wide, The brass roller underneath has an eccentric axle which can be rotated on a series of fixed steps, adjusting the angle of the guide by 1-2 degrees for adding a micro-bevel to the tool being sharpened. The included angle registration jig slides on to an integral dovetail on the front of the guide and includes a series of holes for positioning a sliding stop. In practice the user fits the angle registration jig to the front of the honing guide and tightens the small brass thumbscrew to hold it securely. Where the back edge of the registration jig meets the honing guide there are a series of notches which correspond to the width of the blade being sharpened which are used to ensure that the blade will be positioned exactly in the middle of the honing guide. The registration jig is clearly marked with multiple angles, and Veritas handily include a chart in the instructions giving suggested honing angles for various tools based on their intended usage. The coloured group of angles are used in conjunction with a secondary locking screw on the honing guides' body, which raises and lowers the height of the brass roller. The red high angle setting is useful for traditional wooden soled planes and spokeshaves, where the blade is typically held at a steep angle to the workpiece, whereas the yellow range is for more common mortising chisels and plane irons. The green range is included primarily for the purpose of adding a back bevel to a blade, which can be useful in certain situations where a plane iron needs its effective cutting bevel angle increased to deal with highly figured grain. In practice however there is a large degree of overlap in the angle settings between ranges and there's no reason why a particular angle range needs to be chosen over another when honing, unless the blade is particularly short and cannot be honed at a low bevel while on a high range setting. While using the guide I found it easier to select the angle I wanted at a given range while still allowing enough of the blade to project through the jaws. The sliding stop on the registration jig is positioned at the desired angle the tool is to be honed at and secured in place. The chisel or plane iron is then inserted into the jaws of the honing guide and slid forward until the tip just rests on the stop. With the tool in place the thumbscrews on the jaws can be tightened, the angle registration jig slid off to one side and the blade is ready to begin being honed. The shape of the honing guide is also more ergonomic than my old flat-plated honing guide, in that the thumbs can be more comfortably potisioned underneath the chisel without having to wrap around the clamping mechanism, which is far less fatiguing. After about 15 minutes work at various abrasive grits the primary bevel is complete. At this point the chisel can be stropped/polished to remove the last of the burr that has been created during honing process and used straight away. But the Mk II has one more trick up its sleeve. With the blade still held in place, the eccentric axle on the brass roller can be rotated around to increase the angle of the honing guide by 1-2 degrees and a micro-bevel can be honed into the blade to further refine the cutting ability. Because only the very tip of the blade needs to be worked, only a few strokes are required to finish the micro-bevel Of course, no test of a chisel's sharpness is complete without putting it to use. In this case my rubbish old Stanley 1" chisel is being put to work on the end grain of some Tasmanian Blackwood, a timber that can be notorious for its hard and easy-to-splinter nature. Shearing clean, sub-micron thickness shavings was no trouble whatsoever. Due to the shape of the jaws and low height of the guide, shorter blades are also easy to accommodate. This 2" spokeshave blade can be fitted into the guide and almost any bevel can be consistently honed onto the blade without resorting to guesswork or clumsy attachments. Pros: Solid build quality Registration jig makes setting the bevel angle and squareness easy Able to hold a variety of shorter blades, wide plane irons and chisels Primary bevel and micro bevel setting in one device Comfortable to use Cons: Pricey Narrower blades less than 1/2" wide require the additional narrow jaw set
  17. As regular readers here at ProjectGuitar.com you will have followed the first two parts of this series of write-ups regarding the machining of fret slots on a compact CNC machine; the kind of machine typically available for less than $1000 on various online vendors. Part 1 dealt with the construction of a special jig that allows the accurate positioning of the fret board blank such that precise alignment between the two milled halves can be achieved. Part 2 covered the necessary formatting of the CAD design of a fretboard created with the FretFind2D web application, such that the milling process was safely executed without damage to the fragile endmills. In this, the third and final article we will finally use the jigs and CAD/CAM files and complete the milling of a fretboard on the CNC machine. Endmill Choice Throughout this article I will be using a 0.6mm (or 0.023") diameter endmill to cut the fret slots. The width of this cutter determines the width of the slot being cut and should match the width of the tang of the fretwire being used. In practice a 0.6mm endmill will cut a slightly wider slot by perhaps a few hundredths of a millimetre, due to eccentricity and runout in the spindle. This is advantageous to us; if the 0.6mm cutter could possibly cut a slot exactly the same width as the fret wire tang it would be very difficult to seat the frets. A little bit of leeway will actually help the frets go in easily. You will recall from Part 2 that we limited the final depth of cut to only 1.5mm. It is probably quite obvious that if the fret slot is only this shallow, after radiusing the fretboard this will not leave much depth at the sides to fit the fret wire tang. There are two reasons for limiting the depth of cut on the CNC: The process of slotting the fretboard on the CNC machine is quite slow and wear on the tiny endmills is relatively high. Effectively we are only using the CNC machine to accurately start the fret slot, While it is possible to machine the whole board to the correct depth, it is recommended that cutting the final depth of the fret slot be performed using a hand fret saw with a depth stop. The final accuracy of the slotted board should not suffer from finalising the slots with a handsaw. The low-cost CNC machines may have poor eccentricity specs for the spindle. If this becomes too severe and the fret slot being milled widens too much at the full depth the risk increases of the fret wire not being securely held in place. As ironic as it may sound, it is better that we rely on the CNC as little as possible to maximise our success in this area . Finally, it is highly recommended that you purchase decent quality cutters for this work. Cheap cutters increase the risk of breaking partway through the milling process. They will also likely dull more quickly, and leave behind slots that gradually deteriorate in quality as the work progresses. The endmills I am using are 2-flute cutters made by Kyocera, and are available in bulk packs of 5 or more from several online outlets. Higher-quality endmills with three flutes are also available for a corresponding increase in price - $25 or more for each piece. Right. Enough talking. Lets get machining. Milling the Board Assuming you have a suitable fret board blank at your disposal, use some double-sided tape to secure it to the MDF jig. Position it such that it is centred on the plate as closely as possible. Good planning will dictate that your blank will be cut oversize to allow the excess to be cut off afterwards (it is cut oversize, right?). In this example I am using a piece of Tasmanian Oak. Fit the base plate to the CNC table and tighten it securely. Install the jig with the attached fretboard such that the two holes nearest where the highest fret will be cut are located on the forward holes on the plate. Install some 1/8" pins or spare 1/8" shank cutters in all four corners so that the jig is held securely on the baseplate. Remove the lower-left pin and set it aside for a moment. Turn on the CNC machine and start up the motion control software. Fit a 0.6mm diameter endmill to the collet and home the axes to the extreme minimum limits of their motion, ie X and Y at lowest-left corner of the table and Z at maximum height. Jog the cutter head to just above the centre of the lower-left hole. The and X and Y co-ordinates at this location will form the reference point for the whole milling operation. With the cutter head positioned here touch off the X and Y axes only - do not touch of Z axis yet. Retract the cutter head back from the table and reposition it such that the tip of the endmill just touches the surface of the fret board blank. Do this carefully as you do not want to snap the endmill by accidentally driving it down into the workpiece. Only touch off the Z axis to this position, Re-install the lower-left pin in the jig and load up the first half of the G-code for the fret board job. As we have the fret board blank positioned at the lower end of the table we will be cutting frets 24 to 9 first. If you analyse the toolpath for each of the fret slots on the screen you will notice that each slotting operation is represented as a series of shallow zig-zag patterns gradually increasing in depth until the final depth of cut is achieved. These are the G-code slotting subroutines we created in Part 2. If all appears OK on the motion control software, start the spindle and begin the cutting program. Watch the axis motion and spindle behaviour carefully to see if anything untoward is happening such as excessive vibration or slipping of the fret board on the jig, and be ready to hit the emergency stop button on the mill. Assuming the feed rate is set to around 300mm per minute the first 16 fret slots will take around half an hour to complete. It is a good idea to keep a vacuum cleaner handy while the cutting progresses, as a fair amount of dust and miniature chips will be generated during cutting. Keeping the fret slots clear of chips will also help with minimising wear on the endmill. When the final slot has completed you should have something similar to below. Switch off the spindle, but do not close the motion control software or turn off the power to the CNC machine. We need the machine and software to retain its home and touch-off co-ordinates. Remove all four pins from the jig and slide the plate down such that the first 16 fret slots are overhanging the front of the table. Re-insert the pins in the four holes to re-secure the jig to the bedplate. In the motion control software load up the second half of the fret slotting job. This file should contain the slots for frets 8 to 1, plus the nut position. With this file loaded, turn the spindle on and run the code. The cutter head should advance to the beginning of the 8th fret slot and begin cutting. Again, keep a close eye on proceedings and be ready to hit the E-stop button if things appear to be going amiss. As the number of frets being cut has reduced by half the job should take around a quarter of an hour to complete. With the nut slot cut and the cutter retracted to a safe distance from the workpiece, switch off the spindle and remove the four pins. The final product is shown below: All that remains now is to gently prise off the board from the jig with a paint scraper or similar, and cut the sides to match the taper of the neck you are building. Further thoughts While we have only machined the slots into the fret board lank, there's no reason why you couldn't perform further machining tasks while the fret board is attached to the jig. All that is required is to create the associated toolpaths from the original CAD drawing, split the toolpaths at the same point that the fret slots were split and run the extra stages as further two-part tiles: Using a larger cutter (say 1/8" diameter) the perimeter of the fret board could be machined to give you the correct taper, and also cut off the extremities behind the nut and beyond the 24th fret. If the truss rod you are installing in the neck is the spoke wheel type (with the adjuster at the heel) the notch at the end of the fret board that is normally cut to provide access to the adjuster head can be easily included in the fret board outline. A nut ledge or nut slot could be cut in place of the zero fret slot that we cut in the above example. If your build included a zero fret and nut this could also be incorporated. Multi-scale fret boards can also be machined using the same technique as outlined in these articles. The fret slots are still defined as straight lines, and the slotting subroutines described in Part 2 will work without any modification. Pockets for fret board inlays can be milled in the same fashion. With a little manipulation in CAD/CAM it is also possible to machine precisely sized inlays from contrasting timber, plastics or non-ferrous metals to match these pockets. The fret board radius can be roughed in on the CNC machine, either by progressively running the cutter head in an arc around the Y-axis up the length of the fret board, or by running the cutter head in straight lines parallel to the centre of the fret board in a "staircase" pattern that approximates the radius.
  18. Will that be an event at the next Olympics?
  19. Headless hardware arrived last week, so I can start making some more critical cuts. These things are a work of art. The long turnaround time on them was well worth the wait. But first I need a way of locating and fitting the saddle/tuners. So it was over to the CNC to whip up a jig to create a recess for each saddle to sit into. All it consists of is a plate with a window in the middle and a bunch of locating holes down either side: A secondary plate goes over the top with a pair of pins that align with the corresponding holes underneath. The slot matches the template ring for the palm router, and when fitted with a 1/4" straight bit it creates a recess to match the base of each saddle: Rinse and repeat by moving the top plate down to the next pair of holes. Each pair of holes is 10.5mm apart on the vertical axis to match the string spacing:
  20. The original wiring quite possibly does exactly what the Seymour Duncan diagram describes. It's just that because the switch in your guitar isn't the same as the one specified in the SD diagram there's no reliable way of confirming by sight alone. All you're doing at this stage is a one-for-one replacement of the pickup wires, so as long as you re-terminate the wires to the same spots (accounting for the wire colour differences between the original pickups and the SDs), it should work the same...hopefully! Take notes and/or pictures of the original wiring before you tear into it, if only to provide yourself with a "restore point" if the SDs refuse to work properly.
  21. I have no idea how your switch works. It's not the same as the one shown in the SD diagram, so a like-for-like comparison is difficult. If you're substituting only the pickups then it's only the pickup wiring that has to be transposed. At a guess I would say that in your picture wherever you have green + white on the switch, you need to substitute red + white from the corresponding SD pickup, be it neck or bridge as appropriate. Red in your photo = black from the corresponding SD pickup. It looks like the braid from the existing pickups are soldered to ground. The SD pickups have a braid and a green wire. Both of these need to be soldered to ground to replicate the single braid connection from your existing pickups. The yellow wire in your photo looks like the output of the switch to the volume pot. The corresponding wire in the SD diagram is shown as black from the left lug of the volume pot to the lower terminal of the switch.
  22. Queries: Should the sled the router gets mounted on have some form of side-to-side travel stops to prevent the router bit being accidentally slid into the side pieces? On straight scarf cuts using a template bit it shouldn't be an issue as the bearing will keep the bit from traveling too far left or right. But as soon as you shift one of the sides backwards to introduce the angled scarf cut, the router will lean marginally to one side and the risk of running the tips of the bit into one of the side pieces increases. How do you prevent the bit from being driven into the base of the jig at the bottom of the scarf cut? Sacrificial plywood base perhaps? How does the workpiece get secured in the jig?
  23. Most guitar bodies will be thick enough to accommodate almost any pickup mounted that way. Direct mounting screws are generally shorter than through-scratchplate screws. Another way to provide some height adjustment on a direct-mounted pickup is to put some dense foam between the back of the pick and the bottom of the cavity.
  24. The wider dimension is vertical, so you'll need to find a 4mm diameter router bit to cut the channels. The channel needs to be exactly as deep as the rod so the top surface is flush. Cut them down length with a hacksaw. The CF will ruin a regular handsaw, and replacement blades for hacksaws are cheap. Round over the ends on sandpaper. Avoid the dust it generates, nasty stuff. Watch out that you don't spread the dust on any critical timber surfaces as it can be difficult to get the stains out. Glue them into the channels with epoxy. The last thing you is for them to either rattle around inside the neck, or not actually couple to the timber and offer no support whatsoever.
×
×
  • Create New...