beltjones Posted October 14, 2018 Report Share Posted October 14, 2018 Well, there are times when a man has to admit he has a problem and submit to a higher power. Boys and girls, I'm addicted to building these things. I started builds #4 and #5 without any clear idea of where I'm heading with these designs. I had the wood, and thus I started cutting and gluing. Once again I'm doing neck-through guitars. I don't know why other than I made it work a few times already. The first is a three piece bubinga neck, with a 1" center and .75" on the sides. Next is the other part of 1" bubinga and some subtle curly maple I found for $10 at the lumber yard. There is an ugly spot on the maple but it will be cut away when I carve the neck. This is how I'm gluing these things up. Please tell me if I'm doing something stupid. I glued one board at a time, and I clamped everything to a 48" box level to keep it straight while it glues. The boards were already straight, but I didn't want to introduce any weird tensions when the glue set under clamping pressure. And the other side. And now it's all glued up. I've never had (in three builds, not 30 years or anything) a neck blank so easy to square and flatten than this one. I'm talking three minutes with a hand plane and it's perfect. I also paid about $40 on ebay for about 6 vintage gouges that I'm working on refurbishing for these two builds. I think first I'm going to build a life-size, full detail human skull out of osage orange, and then do a carved top using gouges instead of rasps or an angle grinder. Otherwise, I'm thinking of doing a 24" or 24.5" metal guitar tuned to like drop C or possibly drop A, and a 24.5" jazz guitar with a carved top and back, front and back binding, and a chambered body. The general idea is to build guitars that no one would ever buy, thus my wife won't get mad when they're never sold (even if I try). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottR Posted October 14, 2018 Report Share Posted October 14, 2018 I like the way you think. SR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistermikev Posted October 15, 2018 Report Share Posted October 15, 2018 very nice startup... will be watching. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beltjones Posted October 16, 2018 Author Report Share Posted October 16, 2018 Thanks guys. Here's a $10 piece of curly maple joined and clamped to use as a top on one of the builds. No, it's not bookmatched, but if Gibson doesn't have to bookmatch I think I can get away with it for a while as well. To that end, I need to go deep in the tools section of this site and others on band saws. I have a small one, but I want to upgrade to something that can resaw 8-ish inches. Anyone have any advice? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beltjones Posted November 29, 2018 Author Report Share Posted November 29, 2018 Ok, it's been a while since an update. I've been busy - not too busy to work on this here and there - but too busy to post and write much about what I've been up to. After gluing tops and neck blanks, I started drawing concepts for shapes on the tops. One is going to be sort of tele-inspired but not tele-ish, and the other is more straty, but more like if a strat and an SG had a baby. Here's an in-progress pic of the straty concept between bouts of drawing and erasing. I'm drawing it directly on the top because I want to make sure I have enough material for whatever I come up with. Plus, once it's all drawn out and I like it, I can use the original drawing as the cut lines for the band saw. Once I had the shapes drawn out on the tops I made tracings on paper. This is for two reasons: One, I can use these tracings to make templates for routing body pieces later on, and two, I can fold one side over to make sure that the parts are symmetrical are supposed to be symmetrical. Here are some MDF templates I made. I routed truss rod channels in the neck blanks, including access routes in the headstock. Then cut the angle on the headstock and planed it flat. Next I'll drill the hole to connect the access route with the truss rod channel and drill the tuner holes. With the tuner holes drilled prior to cutting off the back material it should mean that none of the holes will tear out. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andyjr1515 Posted November 29, 2018 Report Share Posted November 29, 2018 Nice bit of planing there Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottR Posted November 29, 2018 Report Share Posted November 29, 2018 6 hours ago, Andyjr1515 said: Nice bit of planing there It certainly is. It was well planned out as well. SR 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beltjones Posted November 29, 2018 Author Report Share Posted November 29, 2018 (edited) 9 hours ago, Andyjr1515 said: Nice bit of planing there I made a leather strop for my chisels, gouges, and plane blades. Good lord, what a difference it made in the sharpness of the tools. After sharpening and then polishing the plane blade with the strop, planing the maple and bubinga was just pure joy, even with a cheap, poorly maintained hand plane. I got so crazy with it that I stropped all of the knives in the kitchen, and of course warned my wife that it would take a lot less pressure to, say, cut up a pineapple. Now if one of the knives gets dull (from, oh I don't know, my mother in law using it to open a can of sweetened condensed milk) we feel like stone age cave people hacking at their food with shards of rock. Edited November 29, 2018 by beltjones 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistermikev Posted November 29, 2018 Report Share Posted November 29, 2018 I have some 7/8 x 7" flamed maple that I've been toying with the idea of using for a lp build at some point... but was apprehensive because it wouldn't be 'bookmatched'. I will take away some confidence on that topic by following this build. thanks for that. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ADFinlayson Posted November 29, 2018 Report Share Posted November 29, 2018 My most recent build isn’t book matched, in fact the 59s that people spend £300k on aren’t bookmatched, so I wouldn’t let it worry you, just match the flames up as best you can 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistermikev Posted November 30, 2018 Report Share Posted November 30, 2018 ADFinalLesson I hear ya. good enough for page it's probably better than good enough for me. on the other hand... if you are going to go through all the trouble to build a lp... why not shell out a few bux more to get a bookmatch. I can see it from both sides. I guess in the end I'll have to see what my wood looks like after I cut it into guitar sized pieces. thanks for the reply/encouragement! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beltjones Posted November 30, 2018 Author Report Share Posted November 30, 2018 Making progress on the neck blanks. I drilled the tuner holes and then cut off the back of the headstock and the back of the neck material. The holes turned out beautiful, with not a bit of tear out. I also wrote on the neck blank itself the depth of the truss rod route which I'll preserve somewhere on the neck blank until the neck carving is complete. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottR Posted December 1, 2018 Report Share Posted December 1, 2018 16 hours ago, beltjones said: Making progress on the neck blanks. I drilled the tuner holes and then cut off the back of the headstock and the back of the neck material. The holes turned out beautiful, with not a bit of tear out. I also wrote on the neck blank itself the depth of the truss rod route which I'll preserve somewhere on the neck blank until the neck carving is complete. I like the way you think. SR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beltjones Posted December 8, 2018 Author Report Share Posted December 8, 2018 Ok, I had some good band saw time a couple of days ago, and some good plane time today. One complicating factor is that I only had one truss rod on hand, which meant I could only glue one fretboard and work on one neck blank. The other truss rod is traveling with his twin on a slow boat from China, so I'll have it in a few weeks. (Side note: I always finish each build with close to enough parts to start another build...) As soon as the other truss rod and his brother arrives I'll glue up that fret board. In the meantime I shaped up one of the neck blanks with the hand plane. Step one, I used fret2find to print out a pattern to guide my band saw cuts. I feel like I do this in a different manner every time. I should probably just make a template from MDF for a perfect neck blank and then use that with a router. But that would deprive me of hand planing, so.... Oh yeah, I marked out and drilled locations for fretboard locating pins (re-purposed picture hanging nails) using.... (use Oprah's voice for this part) My New... DRILLLLLLLLLLL PRESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! To my friends in the EU and Aus, et al - don't act like you don't know how Oprah would say that. Anyway, so I glued the fretboard and then cut off the little nubs for the pins and hand-planed each side. This is after some planing. Oh yeah, I also drilled holes through each blank that I like to use as permanent locating pins for the body wings with mahogany dowels. I tried a half dozen different woods for the dowels, but mahogany is the best tonewood for dowels. Here's the neck blank after planing... and here it is "mocked up" with the mahogany wings. Part of the fun is totally re-doing my process, so for next steps with this one I'll work on the headstock - glueing wings, adding the veneer, and cutting out the basic shape. Then I'll use a dremel to open up the truss rod access and I'll probably use a drill bit and reamer to open the tuner holes in the veneer. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beltjones Posted December 14, 2018 Author Report Share Posted December 14, 2018 I'm still waiting for that truss rod, so I've been keeping myself busy doing little things here and there. I glued wings on the headstocks to accommodate my headstock shape, and then resawed some lightly figured maple to make veneers. I drilled holes through the veneer and then used a reamer to open them up the rest of the way to eliminate any tear-out. After cutting out the rough headstock shape it was time to visit the oscillating sander to shape up the back. The back is shaped up and the sides are sanded to ~90% done. I'll do the rest by hand. And I opened up the truss rod access with the dremel. I might open up the truss rod access a little more - I need to stick an allen wrench in there to see if there's enough room. I'm looking through my list of things to do without that truss rod. I guess I'll carve volutes or something. I'm also thinking about doing a 7.25" radius on one of these. I know conventional wisdom is that 7.25" is no good because the string will fret out when bending. However, the new PRS silver sky has a 7.25" radius, and John Mayer doesn't seem to have a problem with it. Anyway, I went to the local guitar store to see if they had anything with a 7.25" radius because I've never played a guitar like that before. The guy who helped me told me that those don't exist outside of vintage instruments and Fender custom shop stuff. I said, "The new John Mayer PRS has one." He disagreed, and he even said he owns a Silver Sky and he "bends the shit out of it" and it doesn't fret out even with really low action, and that it can't possibly have a 7.25" radius. He looked it up on his phone, and of course I was right. He was super cool and shook my hand and said thanks for the info. Has anyone played a 7.25" radius guitar? Is the whole fretting out thing a myth? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottR Posted December 14, 2018 Report Share Posted December 14, 2018 My first build was roughly that...maybe 7.5". It does indeed fret out on full bends. Higher string action will cure it. SR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andyjr1515 Posted December 15, 2018 Report Share Posted December 15, 2018 18 hours ago, ScottR said: My first build was roughly that...maybe 7.5". It does indeed fret out on full bends. Higher string action will cure it. SR Yes - I agree with @ScottR Also, it depends how far you bend. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beltjones Posted March 11, 2019 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2019 My how time flies. Some updates: I put a 7.5" fretboard on a strat as a test, and I can't get it to fret out when bending. I put a lot of time into leveling the frets, but I didn't do a micro-compound radius or any fall-off toward the end of the fretboard. I like playing it so much I pulled the frets on a tele and re-radiused the fretboard down to 7.5". I started carving the tops on these two builds. Again I've been bad at documenting with pictures, but the summary is that carving wood with gouges is knuckle-cracking, headache-inducing work. I started by routing a border around the top with a rabbet bit. Then I drew lines, and carved from line to line. The other guitar looks better. I'll get pictures of it tomorrow. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistermikev Posted March 11, 2019 Report Share Posted March 11, 2019 1 hour ago, beltjones said: My how time flies. Some updates: I put a 7.5" fretboard on a strat as a test, and I can't get it to fret out when bending. I put a lot of time into leveling the frets, but I didn't do a micro-compound radius or any fall-off toward the end of the fretboard. I like playing it so much I pulled the frets on a tele and re-radiused the fretboard down to 7.5". I started carving the tops on these two builds. Again I've been bad at documenting with pictures, but the summary is that carving wood with gouges is knuckle-cracking, headache-inducing work. I started by routing a border around the top with a rabbet bit. Then I drew lines, and carved from line to line. The other guitar looks better. I'll get pictures of it tomorrow. dang, that's a sweet carve. can't believe how you went from chiseled rough to that... you and the other chisel-meisters here - I'm in awe. one of my fav necks is a 7.5 tele. it'll fret out at a 1.5 step bend but it just is such a good feeling radius - esp for country stuff. just feels fast. there is def a 7.5r tele in my (ever growing) future build list! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ADFinlayson Posted March 11, 2019 Report Share Posted March 11, 2019 Great looking carve that, kudos for pulling that off with the neck attached! It is hard work but I find it very satisfying to see it finished knowing I carved it by hand, with each one of those chips of maple representing a hammer stroke of creativity! @mistermikev the easiest way to go from rough carve go finished carve is to use a random orbital sander and 40 grit, but you can get through a fair few pads doing that. Other option is to move to a wider, shallower gouge that just removes the high spots, then thumb planes and scrapers but there are a lot of hours involved in that method. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottR Posted March 11, 2019 Report Share Posted March 11, 2019 12 hours ago, beltjones said: The other guitar looks better. I'll get pictures of it tomorrow. This one looks mighty good. Very nice job with that carve. It doesn't sound like it was quite as therapeutic for you as it is for me.... SR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.