eXCeSS Posted January 19, 2006 Report Posted January 19, 2006 If a guitar has a cavity (or what looks to be a cavity) for a FR, but there is no hole in the back of the guitar for springs or anything, would there be a way to put either a FR or some other tremolo in there with out having to route a cavity, or fill the hole? Thanks Quote
Nitefly SA Posted January 19, 2006 Report Posted January 19, 2006 kahlers only require a front route Quote
Hughes Posted January 20, 2006 Report Posted January 20, 2006 i believe front rout kahlers have the springs in the baseplate or similar to that...isnt he asking if you can have a floyd rose without a back rout? if so, i say no. you could cut the block off and mount it some how and lose the trem part? Quote
Kevan Posted January 27, 2006 Report Posted January 27, 2006 There are a couple of trem designs that are front mount, or front route. The most popular are the Kahler, with the Washburn "Wonderbar" being a distant (and extinct) 2nd. Quote
thegarehanman Posted January 27, 2006 Report Posted January 27, 2006 If you're willing to drop a few dollars, try the stetsbar. I'll be buying one shortly, for my current project. Quote
soapbarstrat Posted January 27, 2006 Report Posted January 27, 2006 I don't think the washburn wonderbar required any rout, just some screw holes. It was a massive ugly thing, that was all on top of the body, kind of like those hotwheel cars where the whole engine was sitting on top of the hood of the car. LOL Quote
egdeltar Posted January 27, 2006 Report Posted January 27, 2006 Definately sounds like a kahler. Quote
Gorecki Posted January 27, 2006 Report Posted January 27, 2006 Yeah, it's been a long time but I vaguely recall my old Kahler Pro was top only surface mount. And yes the springs were contained inside the bridge itself. Does the route look something like this? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.