Jump to content

Gibson 2013 LPJ Refinish


Recommended Posts

Hi All

I've recently kicked off a refinish mini-project for Chris P, the m/c of an open mic night that tolerates me and our old-gits-band's bassist, Pete.  At these events I, who am not the band's vocalist, sing and Pete, who is not the band's guitarist, plays lead.  I think the pub treats it as 'care in the community'....

Anyway, Chris P has been going on a while to me to have a go at refinishing his Gibson LPJ.  He likes playing it and its sound but is a bit underwhelmed by its utilitarian look:

IMG_8228.JPG

I gave all the normal 'why not sell it and get a fancier one.....you never know what the paint might be hiding....you want it binding?  That can be tricky with a set neck and could go wrong..." advice, but he wants me to have ago, whatever the result.

 

First thing I did was look at the wood as best as I could while the paint was still on:

There was one mark visible on the top - you can see it just above the neck volume in the above photo.

The back was clearly multi-section and with quite marked colour variation:

IMG_8232.JPG

 

...but the figuring on the maple top looked interesting:

IMG_8229.JPG

So - nothing for it but to strip everything off it and then see what is under the finish! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ScottR said:

I'm coming along for the ride!

Does he have a new finish in mind or will that decision be made after you've raised the hood and peeked inside?

SR

Something like this (without the flame):

Chris option 1.jpg

 

Or like this:

gibson-1958-les-paul-plain-top-reissue-vos-284245.jpg

 

As you can see, no pressure then... ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hadn't had a close look at the LPJ's before - I had always assumed the finish was like a satin-finish Studio - and was quite surprised JUST how thin this finish appeared to be:

IMG_8239.JPG 

 

Now I've been tricked before...where you take off the easy and flaky top coat off only to find a clear and impenetrable primer coat underneath.  Having stripped out all the hardware, I got the sanding block out:

IMG_8263.JPG

Could that be WOOD?  ALREADY????

It was :)      

Pretty nice grain pattern too.  The dark patch is definitely a colour variation in the wood and not a burn or dirty mark, but given the intended 'old' finish wasn't going to be a particularly bad feature.

The back is - as also suspected - quite variable in colour for the three sections.  However, again, with staining this is not likely to be a huge issue:

IMG_8265.JPG

 

Next to tackle - the binding...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, inspired by @ScottR and looking at the kind of thing owner Chris was after, I decided that it MUST be possible to make a half-decent job of binding.

The plan was to use the Stewmac Dremel guide for the bulk, and then chisels for the two areas near the neck that the guide would not be able to reach.

The Stewmac guide is....how can I put this kindly...better than nothing   ;):

IMG_8280.JPG

I've used it before and, while it WILL do the job where a conventional precision base won't, it does have to be used with care - mainly that of trying to keep the Dremel perfectly upright at all times.

This was the rout:

IMG_8278.JPG

 

The chiselling at the upper neck join was straightforward:

IMG_8289.JPG

 

The chiselling at the other side was a bit more tricky:

  • The binding has to actually go into the neck to end up flush

IMG_8293.JPG

IMG_8298.JPG

  • The guide follows the top surface and, at the lower horn, this rises then drops again.  As such, you have to level off a small hillock on the bottom shelf of the rout

I then spent a lot of time with some scrap binding ensuring that all of the routs were level and square.  Any lack of squareness leads to twists and if, for example, that happens where the binding curves back on itself, this would lead to gaps.

 

All done, I got a tube of UHU hart glue and stuck it  :D:

IMG_8312.jpg

 

...and that brings the project pretty much up to date other than to confirm that the stick has indeed stuck and initial scraping bodes well:

IMG_8316.JPG

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brave but knowing what might happen is very different to brave and eyes-closed, ears-plugged!

The top should look more like the first LP Andy. They were rarely bookmatched back in the day. Slip matched, randomly put together from different stock. That's part of the thing though. I almost asked if the Maple might be a veneer, however Gibson...."yeah". "Let's put AA Maple under that goldtop". :unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had the first bash with some stains.  Got the colour reasonably well but - to me - it looked a bit boring so I've sanded it off again to try a few other things.  From a colour point of view, I was aiming for this one:

Chris option 1.jpg

 

...and got to this first time round:

IMG_8348.JPG

The main issue is that one of the 'wood dyes' I was using turned out to be NOT what it said on the tin.  It wasn't a soak-into-the-wood dye, it was a sit-like-paint-on-top-of-the-wood stain in reality.  As such, it all but completely hid the wood grain.

So I've stripped it all off and am trying some alternatives. :D

By the way, the finished article will, of course, have cream pickup rings, etc..   I popped the original ones on because I am hopeless at envisaging the overall look of a finish without at least some token hardware in place :rolleyes:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've added the first sealer coats and am now getting much happier with the results.  

In real life the maple grain catches the light quite dramatically for a 'plain' figure and brings out the yellow tints rather than the red and orange ones.  I'm now starting to thing a bit of a gloss coat might enhance - originally I was going to go satin.  I'll ponder on that one.
 

IMG_8371cb.jpg

 

IMG_8373.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not 100% on that myself. It doesn't get that close to the examples posted Andy. I think it looks like the dye went on a little blotchily? Not sure whether that can be remedied or simply if it's fine as it is. It looks like some areas have pulled out a deep tangerine and the others a bright orange rather than the more brown-related tones of the bursts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Prostheta said:

I'm not 100% on that myself. It doesn't get that close to the examples posted Andy. I think it looks like the dye went on a little blotchily? Not sure whether that can be remedied or simply if it's fine as it is. It looks like some areas have pulled out a deep tangerine and the others a bright orange rather than the more brown-related tones of the bursts.

I know exactly what you mean, Carl - but it doesn't actually look like this :lol:

Each time I look at the photos and I think "....nah, that's not right", and then I go to redo it, go to the workshop, see it in the flesh and think, "hang on, that IS right."  

Part of the problem is that my camera has real issues with reds, oranges and ambers.  In real life, this is yellows to ambers to browns and not at all tango that it looks in the photos.  This is maybe a better shot - no direct light and a tweak on the white balance - although it still shows through as overly orange:

IMG_8375.JPG

Does that make it look a bit better? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In fact, this is much closer (I've tweaked the colour balance with the guitar in front of me to try to get close).  Even so, the patch of red in the middle of the lower bout isn't red at all - it's brown!

IMG_8375enh.jpg

Just looked again...yup, this is pretty close to what it actually looks like, for better or for worse :lol: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Prostheta said:

Is that "dirty" colour a real thing?

Not really.  In tweaking the colour for the lighter bits, it has turned the outer areas greenish, which it isn't. The outer bits are closer to the pre-tweaked shot, the lighter bits are closer to the post-tweaked version.

If I get chance, I'll layer the two in Photoshop and merge to get closer.  If I hold the guitar up to the screen with the very first example shot in the thread (which is what the owner sent me) the colours are pretty close....assuming that photo is also representative :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Orange and red have always been problematic for many people. I need to start using a grey card for the same purpose. The Hipshot bridge review I did last week was a nightmare for lighting with the white balance from a half-overcast half-sunny day changing minute to minute. Each photo had a totally different lighting fix even in RAW....

Maybe I should build a DIY softbox for product photography....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...