Jump to content

Need An Amp.


Recommended Posts

marshall is just another one of those brands that counts on their name and not the product to sell units cough gibson cough

Tell that to someone with a JCM800 (non-master volume) + cab and a nice Les Paul getting amazing tone. While the newer Marshalls (and sometimes Gibsons) are definitely lacking in quality, it's hard to argue that 80s Marshall gear wasn't great quality and sounded great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I had been looking at the line 6 spider II, :D but every sound clip I heard from them sounded disgusting, at least all the distortion ones did. I was also looking at the Marshall Mg100dfx or whatever it's called. So any other suggestions? I was looking at those Genz-Benz El Diablos,, and they seemed really nice. If I did go the Carvin direction, what amp would you guys suggest? Thanks again for the help :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

take a look around in hock shops and a large variety of guitar stores and such, sometimes, you can find an older amp for a good price.

Try looking into an older Marshall, or even a Fender, they both sound great (depending on models, and the model names are evading me at the moment) and sometimes you can pick them up real cheap.

If you can find one, I highley recommend a Seymour Duncan amp, I almost bought one, but when i went back to the store with the money, it was gone, it sounded great with twin 12 inch speakers, built in overdrive, reverb and a few other little stuff, and it sounded awesome!

Curtis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tell that to someone with a JCM800 (non-master volume) + cab and a nice Les Paul getting amazing tone. While the newer Marshalls (and sometimes Gibsons) are definitely lacking in quality, it's hard to argue that 80s Marshall gear wasn't great quality and sounded great.

Yeah, they used to, thats how they get their good name, then they kind of stop caring and fall back on their name

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tell that to someone with a JCM800 (non-master volume) + cab and a nice Les Paul getting amazing tone. While the newer Marshalls (and sometimes Gibsons) are definitely lacking in quality, it's hard to argue that 80s Marshall gear wasn't great quality and sounded great.

Yeah, they used to, thats how they get their good name, then they kind of stop caring and fall back on their name

Personally, I think you're talking out of your kiester, Nitefly. Do you even own a Gibson guitar or a Marshall amp? Or did you play one for five minutes at Guitar Center? The Gibsons and Marshalls being produced today are some of the finest production electric instruments EVER produced.

Gibson and Marshall are THE biggest names in rock. Period. Are there people who build higher quality stuff? Jury's out on that one. I see a lot of people who've started out on Gibson and Marshall, moved to other makes because of endorsements or just trying to be different, and they come right back to Gibson and Marshall. A PRS is a great guitar and Mesa builds a fine amp, but they can't quite match the classic feel and tone of the Gibson/Marshall combo. Not better or worse, just different.

Do I like the JCM 900 or 2000 series? Not as much as a broken-in JTM 45 or JCM 800. But they still sound great--in some styles more than others sometimes. I love my Les Paul. Took me a while to find one that spoke to me, but I believe they are the best production instruments you can buy. I've played through PRS, Parker, and Hamer, and none of them can match my Lester in my hands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure, there are a lot of really nice Gibsons out there, but there are a lot that should never have been let past quality control when it comes to finishes and fretwork in particular. Some frighteningly bad detailing on guitars that expensive.

I won't comment on the Marshall issue, because I've got almost zero time on one. I'll stick to my Rivera, thanks ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dangle a 1964 les paul and a 2005 les paul in front of some one, see which one they go for

If there was such a thing as a 1964 Les Paul, it'd probably get bought for investment value and never played, or it'd be parted out on the 'bay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...