YDoesGodMockMeSo Posted January 18, 2004 Report Share Posted January 18, 2004 One: Two: Three: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbkim Posted January 18, 2004 Report Share Posted January 18, 2004 Will this be a 6 inline, 3+3, 4+2...? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YDoesGodMockMeSo Posted January 18, 2004 Author Report Share Posted January 18, 2004 3+3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbkim Posted January 18, 2004 Report Share Posted January 18, 2004 3+3 Ah, in that case, One. I would have picked Three if it were 6 in-line. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YDoesGodMockMeSo Posted January 18, 2004 Author Report Share Posted January 18, 2004 See One is what its supposed to be. Its that lil bit of maple that looks wierd. My neck builder got a lil over zealous with the Bubigina strip . *sigh* i dunno what i want Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lex Luthier Posted January 18, 2004 Report Share Posted January 18, 2004 Personally 3 looks too pointy, especially for a 3&3 config. I voted for 1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
feylya Posted January 18, 2004 Report Share Posted January 18, 2004 Number 1 for a 3+3 Number 2 for a 3+4 if you were doing a seven string Number 3 for a 6. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovekraft Posted January 18, 2004 Report Share Posted January 18, 2004 How 'bout using a headstock overlay? What's your top wood? There's usually enough scrap left over to overlay the headstock. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtis P Posted January 18, 2004 Report Share Posted January 18, 2004 that looks good, same head stock I am usin on my Jackson Tribute Curtis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YDoesGodMockMeSo Posted January 18, 2004 Author Report Share Posted January 18, 2004 How 'bout using a headstock overlay? What's your top wood? There's usually enough scrap left over to overlay the headstock. no top. Curtis..theres 3 slightly different variations of it. Look closely. Anyway. I've decided to just stick w/ the original. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob Posted January 19, 2004 Report Share Posted January 19, 2004 yup, number one looks like the best for 3+3 i think but, you gotta mess around with it to see what looks best, so 10 outta 10 for asking! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fidgec94 Posted January 19, 2004 Report Share Posted January 19, 2004 I voted one Design three would be good for a 3+4 setup (as mentioned by feylya), but i also agree with Lex thats its too pointy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest AlexVDL Posted January 19, 2004 Report Share Posted January 19, 2004 I would make it this way or something like it, so you have the maple on both sides Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YDoesGodMockMeSo Posted January 19, 2004 Author Report Share Posted January 19, 2004 ^... you'd think ..i woulda thought of that . Great idea. If its not too late, I'll see if I can get that. Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snork Posted January 20, 2004 Report Share Posted January 20, 2004 whatever happened to the crazy original headstock ideas.........kinda like MINE...... you guys will FLIP when you see the headstock.... its SO "unjem" like... its pretty classic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alchool Posted January 22, 2004 Report Share Posted January 22, 2004 I voted two. Three is just too pointy for a 3+3 in my opinion. And I like two better than one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StratDudeDan Posted February 6, 2004 Report Share Posted February 6, 2004 one would be good for a 3+3 two would be good for a 6 inline. three would be awesome looking with the rare 2+4. i say go with three. and that fourth that was added in red would be good for a 3+3. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
validpretense Posted February 22, 2004 Report Share Posted February 22, 2004 two would be cool with a 2+4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.