Jump to content

New Design


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Mockups are mockups. When instruments get taken into their final shaping, the details and finer elements of formed are then incorporated. I use CAD a hell of a lot but when it comes down to it, you can't easily substitute hand shaping and finessing with a simple computer model. Same as neck profiles, cutaways and shaping carves....seeing how light plays over curves makes a big difference....

I have enough trust in Hoogle's abilities based on his previous builds to pull some nice instruments out of this.

Go go go. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mockups are mockups. When instruments get taken into their final shaping, the details and finer elements of formed are then incorporated. I use CAD a hell of a lot but when it comes down to it, you can't easily substitute hand shaping and finessing with a simple computer model. Same as neck profiles, cutaways and shaping carves....seeing how light plays over curves makes a big difference....

I have enough trust in Hoogle's abilities based on his previous builds to pull some nice instruments out of this.

Go go go. :D

Tru dat.

I'm a believer. I built a git with a similar shape although the curves were balanced to my taste....and it came in second in GOTM to a Hoog built git. When all is said and done he makes beautiful instruments.

I really like the designs of Henri's guitars that he has shown so far. They are well balanced and flow nicely. And I've seen a number of AF's guitars on here over the years and they've all been stunning.

There's no accounting for taste, there are innumerable concepts of beauty....and ain't that a wonderful thing!

SR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've found mock-ups can be misleading as well. I've re-proportioned my Marlin shape 3 times now because the way it looks in CAD isn't always a perfect representation of how it will look in person. The first time she was too hippy. Then the one I'm working now I've decided I went too far the other direction. So now, in the newest iteration of the shape I brought the horn and upper bout in a little more again for a happy medium between the overly hippy version 1 and the too-wide upper bout version 2.

Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone's own shape is something that can't be wrong. It can be disliked, but it isn't wrong unless the person creating the design says so. I think this design is well done. With guitars having been around for so long, just coming up with something original is tough. I just finished a prototype of my own design, and working out the finer points in a design is something that one spends a lot of time on, so saying it's wrong is to assume that the individual didn't invest much time in the design. Saying you don't like it only means it's not your cup of tea.

I must admit that I like slightly wacky control layouts (not symmetric or whatever)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

for other people who dont know, we've already had this conversation. some people really like this design, as well as a couple of others iv done, whilst others (including you) really dont. as i said before, you cant please everyone. some people think paris hilton is "hot". i think she looks like shes been hit repeatedly with a shovel. and so on and so forth

The lack of symmetry is what I like about it...kind of "Chaos" in a guitar...Picasso's look weird to me though so go figure...

On another note,I think Paris is extremely hot..not for her money or fame,just because if I saw her walking down the street in a ragged pair of pants and a T shirt with a ponytail I would want her based purely on looks.I think some people hate based on perceived personality or the spoiled act...but I know that she is an attractive woman...I see no shovel marks at all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I apologize the harsh words. I could have said it more nicely. I really think these will be fine instruments. I have absolutely no doubt about that.

The upper bout is not wrong.

It could be better balanced though, and the un-continuous curves do look unintentional. But like said you have every right to do it the way you want.

And I should shut up.

Sorry about this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've found mock-ups can be misleading as well. I've re-proportioned my Marlin shape 3 times now because the way it looks in CAD isn't always a perfect representation of how it will look in person. The first time she was too hippy. Then the one I'm working now I've decided I went too far the other direction. So now, in the newest iteration of the shape I brought the horn and upper bout in a little more again for a happy medium between the overly hippy version 1 and the too-wide upper bout version 2.

Chris

Same goes for things which really need manhandling in the real world like plane totes and buns.

I apologize the harsh words. I could have said it more nicely. I really think these will be fine instruments. I have absolutely no doubt about that.

The upper bout is not wrong.

It could be better balanced though, and the un-continuous curves do look unintentional. But like said you have every right to do it the way you want.

And I should shut up.

Sorry about this.

Be quiet and get some sleep Henri. :D

It took me a long time to get used to Finnish direct to-the-pointness. The only thing I would have left out is the word "wrong" though. :D

Your re-mockup takes the shape into more familiar LP/PRS territory which I think Hoogle is (quite rightly) working away from. It's very difficult to design singlecut guitars without leaning towards the proportions of Les Pauls but that is only natural since the LP design works well and is very commonplace in our consciousnesses.

Edited by Prostheta
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There might be a cultural difference like Carl pointed out Finns are direct-to-the-point...

I have a university degree in industrial design and over 13 years working experience in product, service and user interface design.

While all that alone does not make anyone a good designer it gives some understanding of form and shape. But it also it makes me understand you don't need all that to make great design.

That should also make me to think what to write and not to write what I think... Oh, and I know I can be wrong too and given good arguments I am happy to admit it.

We come from different worlds, I guess. In the design world if you get that barely noticeable nod from your colleague you know you have done a good job. Sometimes you don't get even that but it doesn't mean you have done a bad job. Because if you have you will always hear about that. And it's not "I don't like this or that". There is always argumentation too. Critique can sometimes be very harsh and we can long argument about some tiny small detail that no one would ever even notice. It is not easy to remember that not everyone can take it. I try to be more constructive with my critique and be more exact and clarify what I mean.

My design thinking is very much Scandinavian and I know very well that is not universal thinking. Anyhow the international design world shares some principles and rules that are good to know. When you know you should try the limits are break them. It is very much an advisable thing to try the limits and go away from usual patterns, i.e. the LP/PRS shape here. It is not an easy task. LP shape is designed very close to "golden ratio" which makes the shape pleasing and easy, but when you break something you easily ruin the whole thing. Like I said before you have done some very good thinking here.

This should be it for now, keep up with the good work.

/henri

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My designs were done on a sketch pad with Crayola colored pencils then painstakingly recreated in MS Paint and then again painstakingly recreated in inkscape in full size vector format and smoothed out. I think I would rather do it all by hand than learn to use a cnc. That sounds like college material to me. Good luck on the rest of this build.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its really hard to take pictures of the carve. it looks really square edged, but its all curvy i promise. the bit on the flat part that looks like a bit of torn out wood is just that. it will either be sanded out with sanding, or it can be filled if not as this ones the goldtop. its not as deep as it looks in the pics though

18.jpg

19.jpg

also, stupid me buggered up the fretboards. both of them!! so i got new ones which are just waiting for binding, then sanding, then fretting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure how you need CAD and CNC to make balanced, artistic, proportional and aesthetically pleasing guitar designs? I did just fine with CAD for years, and continue to without CNC. Don't let a lack of tools be an excuse for poor design or craftsmanship. I'm not saying you do, but your post entered that territory and I wanted to let future noobs reading this know that you can indeed build amazing guitars with minimal tools, etc. I like having more tools now a days, but I had a great time and did fine before then too.

Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure how you need CAD and CNC to make balanced, artistic, proportional and aesthetically pleasing guitar designs? I did just fine with CAD for years, and continue to without CNC. Don't let a lack of tools be an excuse for poor design or craftsmanship. I'm not saying you do, but your post entered that territory and I wanted to let future noobs reading this know that you can indeed build amazing guitars with minimal tools, etc. I like having more tools now a days, but I had a great time and did fine before then too.

Chris

Not sure whether you meant me or not, but I'll wade in anyway. :D

I never advocated CNC directly (not that I can remember) but I believe that the geometric possibilities that come from using CAD are a great complement to traditional organic drawing and hand drafting. These things are a relatively modern invention in comparison to the guitar, and they definitely haven't revamped the instrument except for perhaps in the manufacturing sector.

I think that if it is productive and a great tool, then by all means use it. Whether that be a new type of rasp, a CAD/visualisation package or whatever. I'm right in the middle of "minimal tools" right here as I type this! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...