Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

you chamber for two reasons. 1, reduce weight - 2, change the sound.

If you have one big route it has more impact on the sound wheras lots of little ones is primarily done for weight - although will still have some impact on the sound

Posted

It would seem that Gibson did the chambering on the BFG mainly as a weight reduction thing - so in order to not change the sound as much from what we expect from a LP, they probably should have done it Warmoth style? (but I guess that's more expensive on a large production level)

Posted

Do i see a slight gap between the tenon and the pocket? And what is with that huge route at the end of the pocket?

What effect on sound would that route have, it looks like an empty pocket?

Posted
Do i see a slight gap between the tenon and the pocket? And what is with that huge route at the end of the pocket?

What effect on sound would that route have, it looks like an empty pocket?

I dont think gibson are reknowned for their tight neck joint fits... I saw a pretty nasty looking cross section of one on here once.

And isnt the big route at the end of the pocket the p-90 route.... or did I misunderstand what you were refeting to?

Posted

gibson always leave a gap there and its not really an issue since that area wwould be an end grain glue joint anyway and its a good idea to have a way to let excess glue escape - but there is absolutely no reason for the gap to be as big as that - unless BFG stands for Big f***** Gap

Posted
Posted

The idea apparently behind Warmoth having many separate chambers is that if the same area is routed as the Gibson chambering, but the chamber is split up into many, that you get almost exactly the same weight reduction and tone, but feedback issues common on semi-hollow guitars won't be as prevalent.

One interesting thing though is that if you look at Warmoth's hollow LP bodies in particular, there aren't as many chambers on that model as their Strat bodies.

hollow_lp_routing1.jpg

(image from www.warmoth.com)

Posted

Slightly off topic, I was in the local guitar shop a while back and the guy was running through the latest stuff, etc. I forget how we got onto it, but at one point he takes a new Les Paul off the rack and shakes it and says "hear that?". I could hear a rattle sound but I said that it must be hardware, I was thinking the pickups in the rings or something. He said that it was actually debris inside the chambers. I thought this was pretty hard to believe, but he said that there had been an info note from Gibson on it. He shook several and they all did it. He said the tops went on without blowing out the wood chips. Does this make any sense?

Posted

Makes plenty of sense. Why create a job for someone to blow woodchips out of guitars when you can make more profit? Oh well, at least they didn't create some bogus excuse such as "this guitar is filled with tone flakes that will enrich your tone!"

Tone flakes, another million dollar invention.

Posted
Makes plenty of sense. Why create a job for someone to blow woodchips out of guitars when you can make more profit? Oh well, at least they didn't create some bogus excuse such as "this guitar is filled with tone flakes that will enrich your tone!"

Tone flakes, another million dollar invention.

:D

Posted
Slightly off topic, I was in the local guitar shop a while back and the guy was running through the latest stuff, etc. I forget how we got onto it, but at one point he takes a new Les Paul off the rack and shakes it and says "hear that?". I could hear a rattle sound but I said that it must be hardware, I was thinking the pickups in the rings or something. He said that it was actually debris inside the chambers. I thought this was pretty hard to believe, but he said that there had been an info note from Gibson on it. He shook several and they all did it. He said the tops went on without blowing out the wood chips. Does this make any sense?

I played a Gibson that did that today, in fact every les paul i played today played like crap for the price they charge.

Quality control is getting more norlin-like again.

Posted
Makes plenty of sense. Why create a job for someone to blow woodchips out of guitars when you can make more profit? Oh well, at least they didn't create some bogus excuse such as "this guitar is filled with tone flakes that will enrich your tone!"

Tone flakes, another million dollar invention.

What section of the cereal isle are those in? Is it by the Wheaties, or are they down with the sugar coated stuff?

"Tone Flakes, for that instant perfect tone every morning. Now available in Frosted Tone Flakes, for that extra Sweeter Tone."

Posted
With all this technology available today (not that its needed), Gibson still cant get a neck joint right...

Wow, didn't even notice that when I looked at the pic, yeah that neck pocket work is worth 2500.00 :D

Posted
gibson always leave a gap there and its not really an issue since that area wwould be an end grain glue joint anyway and its a good idea to have a way to let excess glue escape - but there is absolutely no reason for the gap to be as big as that - unless BFG stands for Big f***** Gap

+1

Posted

My first job was working in a furniture factory for a rather well respected company & the joints were purposely CNC'd loose so that we didn't need to knock them together...unfortunately we needed to use so much glue & nails that I doubt that they saved any money. I guess Gibson is under the same dillusion.

Posted
Wow, didn't even notice that when I looked at the pic, yeah that neck pocket work is worth 2500.00 :D

A BFG is only about $800. For $2500, you can get a Reissue model that has the long tenon neck joint.

On my '04 Classic, it has a weight-relieved body with the holes drilled in the mahogany, but Gibson just started the major hogging this year. I'm usually one of Gibson's biggest apologists on this board, but I really don't like it. I think they're getting lower grade mahogany that's heavy and tone-dead.

They better get their act together. The only thing keeping the PRS Singlecut from completely eating their lunch are the prices PRS is charging for 'em. They compete more with the Reissues rather than the Standards.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...