Jump to content

Drak - The Transconfiguration Thread


Recommended Posts

Well, I have been pulling a lot of old projects out of mothballs lately.

This guitar build has a Backstory to it indeed, sorry if the first post is a bit long-winded.

It started out several years ago when I started building a few Gibson-style single-cuts.

Les Paul shaped, but 1/2-way between a LP size and a full-blown hollowbody size...

You might call it a 3/4 hollowbody, HEAVILY chambered.

They were my take on a hybrid solidbody/hollowbody as a lot of us wind up doing at some point,

experimenting with chambering and all that kind of thing.

To be honest, they all got mothballed as I took up other projects.

I started 5 of them, most got past the 1/2 way point before coming to a stop while I built other projects.

As time has passed and I finished up all of the Cow-Town Teles (my true favorite guitars) I was working on, I made a decision that I loved everything about the C-T Teles, and if I could change anything at all, it would be to gain some more access to the upper frets that the upper horn on a Tele inhibits. Everything else I absolutely love about them.

Sadly, I would have to go without my signature steerhead that I love so much, but no big deal.

Maybe I can work it in one day somehow.

So I decided a double-cut was the obvious way to go, and have now built my own template for a doublecut.

I had recently decided that I no longer wanted 5 of these 3/4 hollow things, they're a little bigger and heavier than I want, chambered tho they are. Not that I don't like them, but I don't need 5 of them.

One of them was an Alder body / Buckeye Burl front and back

(remember Major Tom? that's Buckeye Burl, and yes, I still have it B) )

I had decided to toss away the body/back, and use the cool top for one of my new doublecuts.

I was sanding the top today after pulling it back out and having a look at it, and marking out the new doublecut outline.

Afterwards, I had the idea to try and use the back as well, but it would involve a LOT of work

to remove all the Alder wood (it has been glued on)

Now anybody who knows my past knows I will toss a body at the flick of a switch if it isn't up to my spec B) .

BUT...hahaha! Marriage and a house note has changed ALL that, the disposable income I used to have is

sort of dried up, so I am more apt these days to work with what I have.

As I was looking at the newly-sanded top and mulling over using the back if I could rip it off (a LOT of work)

the idea hit me to completely morph the entire project from a singlecut to the new, smaller, lighter doublecut.

Conserve the entire thing and Make It Work somehow.

This is a completely foreign concept to me, as there is going to be some Very Weird Patching and Morphing going on, something I usually don't do, but there it is. The bodies... do not exactly line up with each other... you'll see.

Many pics to follow, and Spring is ready to be sprung here very shortly, so it should progress pretty quickly.

Follow me from the very beginning as I morph one guitar shape into another,

and how I treat the numerous problems I am going to run into and make a

Double-Franken-Morph-Cut out of this thing.

That is what will make this thread fun, because there's a lot of cool / interesting problems to sort out and work thru.

But the basic body and top/back woods are definitely worth trying to save.

...Did I just say that? :D

Pics to follow shortly, and it feels great to be building again! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And now, to hijack my own thread... :D

Here is another one that was going to be a 3/4 hollow, just pulled this out...this was going to be the back, but is now going to be a topper for another doublecut...yes, this one is wetted down for your viewing pleasure. :D

GUITAR050.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Wes.

The chambers are really why I decided to keep it, as it is such a PITA and waste of wood to remove so much wood to make one of these things from a solidbody hunk of wood, and it's basically hollowed out and ready to go for the most part.

That was the redeeming quality it had going for it and why I decided to give this a try.

This build is really not a typical build thread at all.

It's about how many obstacles I'll have to overcome and how I overcome them in detail.

My goals here are these:

1) To conserve the original wood in the most economical way and change the shape

3) Show how I deal with all the problems involved in the changeup process

4) Show ALL the warts and blemishes before fixing them and then how I fix them

6) In the end, when it's finished, that NO ONE playing it would EVER be able to tell

that this was anything but a build from scratch, all mistakes have to be covered

100% so no one would ever know.

It has to be show quality, with all warts either fixed or hidden to my satisfaction

It can't look like a botched stupid fix-er-up job, it has to qualify for my standards or it's toast.

I always want people to know I am an amateur with amateur tools,

and if I can do something, any amateur can do it if it's thought out properly.

I always figured that's why this site was here in the first place,

to show amateurs how they can make things happen with little tooling and still make it rock. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...