IPA or death Posted June 24, 2009 Report Posted June 24, 2009 I've been wondering whether it's a bad idea to use the "sandwich" method of body building. No, I don't mean like Subway's Jared did. I'm talking about using boards thinner than the final thickness of the body glued together. Gibson made some guitars like this at one time, the Les Paul Recording and Deluxe models for a while. Pete Townshend signature Gibson I would assume there are other companies today doing the same in a cost cutting effort without making it well known. But is there any tonal difference in a body put together in this manner than a two-piece which is at final thickness and glued together down the middle? Seems like a good way to make a cheaper body if the glue lines don't bother you. Anyone use this technique or have any warnings, etc? Quote
westhemann Posted June 24, 2009 Report Posted June 24, 2009 I have done it...it works well and the sound is great.Mine was not only split in half front to back,but it is also split side to side... All that project really proved to me is that the glue line =tone death theory is complete B.S. Quote
Drak Posted June 24, 2009 Report Posted June 24, 2009 My '73 Les Paul Custom is a Mahogany Sammy, and I tried out about 10 LP's before I bought her (23 years ago!). She was the best sounding of all the ones I tried, I instantly knew it was 'the one'. And it's a sammy, and it sound tremendous. Fantastic guitar. Still have it. And I'm building a 5-piece Sammy right now AAMOF, look up my Afterburner thread, I just posted pics where you can see the sammy lines after the final body route, and the tap tone on that thing is monster good. Like Wes said, it's BS. Now having said that, I have also seen companies who use like 8 sticks of wood all glued together. From that perspective, I think those guitars are pretty trashy, but they're trashy because the whole guitar was built like that, cheaply, and using 8 sticks of Alder is a 'cheap shot' in my opinion. So anything in good measure is usually OK, but anything taken to extremes is probably not OK. Quote
Quarter Posted June 24, 2009 Report Posted June 24, 2009 One possible downside, if you want to call it that, is that if using something like regular old Tightbond, you are introducing a bit of moisture back into center of your blank. In that case, I'd allow enough time in the build process for it to equalize. Quote
Woodenspoke Posted June 24, 2009 Report Posted June 24, 2009 Well it is certianly not a tonal downer if that is the question. Adding multiple strips in a nice pattern is not uncommon but it done for the look rather than to save cost. I personaly do not like random glue ups clear coated they look cheap. If it's painted you have several pieces to deal with as the wood breathes during sesonal changes so you could see many lines forming in the paint over time. Quote
Prostheta Posted June 24, 2009 Report Posted June 24, 2009 alembic! Les Claypool's Carl Thompson Rainbow Bass :-D Quote
Xanthus Posted June 24, 2009 Report Posted June 24, 2009 alembic! Les Claypool's Carl Thompson Rainbow Bass :-D Plywood! What, it counts, right? Quote
WezV Posted June 24, 2009 Report Posted June 24, 2009 lets start calling them composite bodies instead - it sounds fancier Quote
Prostheta Posted June 24, 2009 Report Posted June 24, 2009 Composite? How about CompoundToneSubstrate? Quote
ihocky2 Posted June 25, 2009 Report Posted June 25, 2009 Composite? How about CompoundToneSubstrate? I like that. I could even see that working as a way to sell MDF bodies. Quote
Xanthus Posted June 25, 2009 Report Posted June 25, 2009 The combined tonal spectrum of up to FIFTEEN woods! Quote
postal Posted June 26, 2009 Report Posted June 26, 2009 ... Yes... but how does titebond "sound"? Tonal spectrum of glue.... who wants to compare the sound of hide/epoxy/pva? haha! I think you can use many pieces of wood as long as the quality of the joint is good. You do want more wood than glue though, or you will be hearing the "glue" instead of the woods. Quote
stereordinary Posted June 26, 2009 Report Posted June 26, 2009 butcher bock guitar I made a body like that once: Quote
Cam Posted June 26, 2009 Report Posted June 26, 2009 what, you cut up a cutting board or something Quote
fridge Posted June 26, 2009 Report Posted June 26, 2009 The first guitar I built was a King V and it was from a cuttingboard made up of glued up squares of wood lol. The tone was however terrible!!! Quote
Workingman Posted June 26, 2009 Report Posted June 26, 2009 For a proper butcher block it would have to be made of little blocks with the end grain out. I don't think that would be very stable under string pressure though Quote
postal Posted June 28, 2009 Report Posted June 28, 2009 For a proper butcher block it would have to be made of little blocks with the end grain out. I don't think that would be very stable under string pressure though If someone likes that look, a normal 2 piece solidbody with a thin butcher block cap would probably sound fine and have plenty of strength as well. Personally, I dont like that look- but it'd be "do able". Quote
erikbojerik Posted June 29, 2009 Report Posted June 29, 2009 As far as glue/wood ratio, there are MILES of difference between even a hardwood butcher block (stripes not squares) and plywood. The N-Butcher Block (where N=number of stripes) is probably fine so long as your stripes run the entire length of the body. Endgrain-to-endgrain is the worst and weakest joint ever. But yes - painted it will eventually start to reveal witness lines that will allow you to guess how many pieces are underneath there (my black '93 MIM Strat is 5-piece). The Gibson sammys are called "pancake" bodies - I think because they are still 13" wide but just constructed from 4/4 stock instead of 8/4. I don't think they have a centerline glue joint in the mahogany, but I could be wrong. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.